Sign In Join 



Subaru Legacy/Outback Tire Issues

183 messages,  Last post on Oct 25, 2008 at 5:53 AM

You are in the Subaru Legacy & Outback Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Subaru Legacy, Subaru Outback, Tires, Sedan, Wagon


Messages Page 14 of 19
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
19
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#123 of 183
Re: No warranty on original tires ??? [milem] by jfl
Oct 27, 2007 (3:05 pm)
Reply

Replying to: milem (Oct 27, 2007 9:30 am)

I had a very good experience purchasing from tirerack. Great prices & efficient delivery.
 
Had the tires shipped directly to one of their "approved" mounting shops. (A friend also used and recommended this place.) This shop specializes in alignment and tires. The people were more knowledgable than any other alignment shop I've ever been to. Of course, they also charged for all that experience and knowledge. What I saved on the tires, I spent on the installation and alignment.
 
Choose your installer carefully...
 
I'll probably use tirerack again, but I'd have to think about this installer...
 
My $0.02.
 
Jim
#124 of 183
Re: No warranty on original tires ??? [jfl] by paisan
Oct 27, 2007 (6:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jfl (Oct 27, 2007 3:05 pm)

I've been touting the Sumitomo HTR+ and HTR H4s for a long while as the best bang for your buck all season tire for around $60-70 they are great in snow and wet!
 
-mike
#125 of 183
Re: No warranty on original tires ??? [paisan] by snowbelter
Oct 28, 2007 (7:47 am)
Reply

Replying to: paisan (Oct 27, 2007 6:49 pm)

The Outback calls for a 225/55/17 V rated tire and when I looked at the Sumitomo HTR+, they were only available in an "H" rating. I'm not a fan of going to a lower speed rated tire. I've read that V rated tires are less likely to fail from hitting potholes, etc than is an H rated tire.
#126 of 183
Re: No warranty on original tires ??? [snowbelter] by paisan
Oct 28, 2007 (7:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: snowbelter (Oct 28, 2007 7:47 am)

The failure rate of the speed rating has to do with heat, not potholes! Essentially the speed rating is the sustained speed you would need to go for the tires to blow out. It has nothing to do with pothole resistance.
 
Unless you plan on doing a sustained speed over 130mph, you won't run into problems. I've ran em on track, on road, and through blizzards on my SVX, no issues.
 
Also I live in NYC so I've hit potholes bigger than you can imagine.
 
-mike
#127 of 183
Re: No warranty on original tires ??? [paisan] by snowbelter
Oct 29, 2007 (3:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: paisan (Oct 28, 2007 7:12 pm)

I am well aware that the speed ratings relate to speed and heat build-up. I understand there is also a relationshion to the strength of the tire. I've read that a tire with a higher speed rating provides greater resistance to failure, in a low profile tire, which I have read is more susceptible to damage from hitting a pothole.
 
And yes, I'm also aware that there are a number of articles questioning why family cars such as Subarus come from the factory with V rated tires which are expensive, don't wear well, and may be overkill.
 
Martin
#128 of 183
Re: No warranty on original tires ??? [milem] by krzyss
Oct 29, 2007 (5:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: milem (Oct 27, 2007 9:30 am)

I also find it easy to buy tires (I think I bought 3 or 4 sets from tirerack.com in last 10 years). It is much harder to find good installer.
 
Sometimes I use tirerack price for local store to drop the price.
 
Krzys
 
PS Tell your local store that 300 tire can be had for 112 + S&H and see the price drop in an instant.
#129 of 183
Re: No warranty on original tires ??? [paisan] by krzyss
Oct 29, 2007 (5:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: paisan (Oct 28, 2007 7:12 pm)

"the speed rating is the sustained speed you would need to go for the tires to blow out. It has nothing to do with pothole resistance."
 
Yes you are right but...
 
V rated tire must be built more robust that H rated one. It might be better to survive pothole hit as a by-product of its higher speed rating.
 
BUT...
 
If you hit pothole would you rather replace blown tire or bent pieces of suspension?
 
Krzys
#130 of 183
speed rating by cptplt
Oct 29, 2007 (11:22 am)
Reply
there is no sound reason why the OB/Legacy need a H rated tire unless its the 4 turbo, the reason they have V rated is that the RE92A in the stock size comes as a v. when I got my 02 WRX, they were putting V rated RE92 tires on the base Impreza too! Subaru probably just has a contract with Bridgestone for a warehouse or two full of that particular tire! Imay not go with a T rated tire but an H is fine, lets face it, half the people using snowtires are on Qs!
#131 of 183
Re: speed rating [cptplt] by paisan
Oct 29, 2007 (5:02 pm)
Reply

Replying to: cptplt (Oct 29, 2007 11:22 am)

I am still going to disagree on the "higher rating" meaning a stronger tire. Think of it logically, if the sidewalls are stiffer they are MORE suseptable to being destroyed by a pothole, than one with a softer more pliable one. As testament, I've gotten way more bubbles in "speed rated" tires with stiffer sidewalls than in standard regular tires. Also when offroading we purposely air-down our tires, not only to give us float over mud but to allow the tires to be far more pliable when rock-crawling. I've seen a lot of offroaders blow tires running at street pressure, whereas very rarely do you damage your tires rock crawling with aired-down tires.
 
-mike

Messages Page 14 of 19
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
19
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement