Sign In Join 



Acura TL 2009 -

1532 messages,  Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 11:05 AM

You are in the Acura TL Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Acura TL, Sedan


Messages Page 139 of 154
1
...
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
...
154
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1375 of 1532
gas mileage by maxbeta
Apr 19, 2009 (6:32 pm)
Reply

Replying to: eg424 (Apr 15, 2009 9:51 pm)

Why rely on the computer and just let that be it and be disappointed? Maybe you should test the gas mileage yourself. Fill your tank, write down your starting mileage, drive your normal around town routine and when you get down to half a tank +/-, then re-fuel and note the number of gallons it took to fill up and your ending mileage. Then divide the # of miles you drove by the number of gallons.
 
Same thing when you go on an out of town trip. That will give you your highway mileage.
 
You will then know not only what your real MPG is, burt also how the computer compares.
#1376 of 1532
Re: gas mileage [maxbeta] by Chasboy
Apr 20, 2009 (6:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: maxbeta (Apr 19, 2009 6:32 pm)

You can also set your A or B trip odometer when you fill the tank initially, then use that number for your calcs.
#1377 of 1532
Re: gas mileage [Chasboy] by jpdisarro
Apr 20, 2009 (7:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: Chasboy (Apr 20, 2009 6:06 am)

I have never had the luxury of a trip computer, so I have always used one of my trip odometers for mileage calculation. It's the easiest and most accurate method.
#1378 of 1532
Re: No Remorse [eg424] by 4thaccord
Apr 20, 2009 (5:25 pm)
Reply

Replying to: eg424 (Apr 15, 2009 9:51 pm)

Well I doubt a polite person would say to your face "man, that car is hideous". I've seen similar posts from people who say "everywhere I go I see people staring at my car".. Duh. Of course they're staring, the car looks ridiculous.
#1379 of 1532
Re: No Remorse [hpmctorque] by eg424
Apr 20, 2009 (8:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: hpmctorque (Apr 18, 2009 3:09 am)

My former car is a 2004 Honda Accord Ex......... which I still have. And yes, my Acura is the FWD w. tech.
#1380 of 1532
FWD or SH-AWD? by sdcares
Apr 23, 2009 (11:11 am)
Reply
Hi folks,
 
I need some advice on which TL to get (FWD or SH-AWD).
 
Getting close to purchasing a new TL tech to replace my 2002 RSX. I live in SoCal where the AWD is not likely to be helpful due to the stable weather conditions. I do however make freq trips through the mountains (I-8 East) where occassional sleet and snow can develop in the winter months at altitude. Also the interstate itself is known for winding curves, steep grades, and high winds. My goal is safety above performance. I am a careful driver in general.
 
Does the SH-AWD features add substantially to the safety of the vehicle? or is it only a performance advantage?
#1381 of 1532
Re: FWD or SH-AWD? [sdcares] by Chasboy
Apr 23, 2009 (3:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sdcares (Apr 23, 2009 11:11 am)

SD, look at the list of options that come standard with the AWD. Much more worthwhile than the Tech IMHO. I love the handling and power of mine and the security of knowing I have a much better chance dealing with questionable weather/road conditions. Of course, weather here in the northeast is slightly different than yours.!!
#1382 of 1532
TL Appearance by cebteb
Apr 24, 2009 (12:46 pm)
Reply
I'm puzzled at all of the negative commentary regarding the styling and appearance of the 2009 Acura TL. I went to the Denver auto show the first weekend in April. Turnout on the last day was greater than I've ever seen on a last day previously. Acura had two TLs on display (FWD and AWD) and there was a continuos line of people waiting to sit in both. Obviously they weren't turned off by the TL's new styling. There were several oohs and awes from the folks looking at the TL. I know that the TL's looks impressed the wife and I. I'd say it was one of the bigger attractions at the auto show, with the biggest attraction being the Aston Martin display.
 
We also wanted to view some of the TL's principle competitors, so we checked out the Lexus ES350. Only one rather bland looking one on display and no lines. In fact, not much traffic at all in the Lexus area.
 
Wanted to see the new Nissan Maxima, but Nissan chose to skip the show, so no go. Checked out the Infinity G37 and it is quite good looking, but still (same as the prior design of the G35) too small. It is truly a compact car. Much too tight a fit for these old bones. We are looking to replace our '99 Chrysler 300M, so we are used to having some space in our sports sedan.
 
Didn't bother with any of the European competitors because I view them as over-priced and generally small and content-lacking unless you go big dollars. In addition, styling isn't the strong point for most of them. Also didn't see many American-made competitors, save the Cadillac CTS. Nice looking car with impressive performance, but again too small. Really a compact car like the Infinity G37. Wife (43 years old) bumped her head just trying to get into it. The CTS was getting a lot of show traffic though.
 
So, in conclusion, I sure didn't see any evidence that the Acura TLs styling was turning people off. Can't wait until June when financially all will be go to buy one. Need to get out and test drive a couple to decide between FWD and AWD. Really concerned about the stiff ride comments concerning the AWD model as we have had to tolerate that for 10 years with the 300M.
#1383 of 1532
Re: TL Appearance [cebteb] by Chasboy
Apr 24, 2009 (4:07 pm)
Reply

Replying to: cebteb (Apr 24, 2009 12:46 pm)

cebteb, I echo your opinion. In addition I find it strange that people who chose to share their car quest with others are told, after spending around $40,000 of their hard earned money on a car that they are excited about, that their new pride and joy looks ridiculous.
As for AWD vs FWD, having been a veteran 4x4 owner,(and operating a snowplow service for a number of years) I have strong feelings about the difference between the 2. In the northeast, snow and other types of slippery conditions are a part of life. There are some of the uninformed who think that FWD is like driving a Jeep. It ain't the case. If you are in an area like that, strongly consider the AWD. I tested both, more than once. Honestly, I didn't know about the harder ride until I read about it, and I guess I let the power of suggestion make me think the ride is harder. The car is so quiet and smooth I would describe the overall driving feel as 'stealthy".
#1384 of 1532
Re: TL Appearance [cebteb] by eg424
Apr 24, 2009 (6:23 pm)
Reply

Replying to: cebteb (Apr 24, 2009 12:46 pm)

I agree with you about all the negative comments concerning the styling. In my previous post #1372, I shared my comments about the car.
 
It is an "edgy design". As such... it is not for everyone. I will tell you that I get nothing but positive comments from friends and strangers.
 
I am sure that color combinations can impact one's opinion of the styling. For example, I did not like the car in black but thought that the red pearl looked "rich".
 
I do find that younger people especially like the looks of the car. One person, at work, said he thought the TL looked like a concept design that actually reached the streets.
 
I remember the shouts of horror when the BMW 5 Series was redesigned. I think the negative comments, about its backend, were almost universal. Fast forward to today. The 5 series is one of the most ubiquitous models seen in Southern California.

Messages Page 139 of 154
1
...
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
...
154
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement