Sign In Join 



Acura TL 2009 -

1532 messages,  Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 11:05 AM

You are in the Acura TL Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Acura TL, Sedan


Messages Page 125 of 154
1
...
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
...
154
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1236 of 1532
Re: 2009 ACURA TL FWD or SHAWD? VERDICT......... [golfrski] by ezielanski
Nov 23, 2008 (6:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: golfrski (Nov 23, 2008 5:29 am)

I couldn't agree more. I too wanted the AWD TL. But decided to sacrifice the AWD for the TECH because of price. My budget was already stretched so I couldn't do both. But I've been curious as to what others think of the AWD and if it's worth the extra $. I'm sure it sticks to the road like the 06 RL I had but the FWD version does too. Just requires a little more work. I've had the car for three weeks and I couldn't be happier. Good luck with the car and enjoy playing with the various tech functions. Unbelievable. I've had a lot of cars, (40 yrs. driving) and this is the first one in a long time I didn't want to get out of.
#1237 of 1532
Re: 2009 ACURA TL FWD or SHAWD? VERDICT......... [ezielanski] by billyperks2
Nov 24, 2008 (10:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: ezielanski (Nov 23, 2008 6:38 pm)

I dont want the AWD, I need it here in Connecticut plus the little SH-AWD badging looks real nice on the back:)
I had a terrible experience with the 03 Type S, the car was outright undriveable in the snow.
#1238 of 1532
Re: 2009 ACURA TL FWD or SHAWD? VERDICT......... [billyperks2] by bodble2
Nov 24, 2008 (11:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: billyperks2 (Nov 24, 2008 10:38 am)

"I dont want the AWD, I need it here in Connecticut..."
 
 
#1239 of 1532
Re: 2009 ACURA TL FWD or SHAWD? VERDICT......... [bodble2] by laurasdada
Nov 24, 2008 (12:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bodble2 (Nov 24, 2008 11:12 am)

I'm not sure that I agree with needing AWD in CT (I grew up there...). I do, however for the '04-'08 gen TL, believe that you do need snow shoes. I survived two Boston winters with my '05, but when I swappd the OEM Bridgestones for some Toyos, the snow-ability got a bit worse (which I didn't think was possible!) and bought dedicated snows on some snazzy alloys from Tire Rack. All is well now. In fact, will probably mount 'em on the sled next week.
 
Lifelong New Englander and skier. Having AWD would have been beneficial a few times in my driving life, but certainly not a necessity. With FWD and all-season's, I've always gotten to my destination (until the TL). I am not, of course, billyperks2 so what is right for me, may not be right for him.
 
Since, for the first time in my life I've bought and mounted snows, this has emboldened me to consider a RWD car next...
 
Oh, and speaking of the '09 TL, stylewise: In profile it's not bad. My only objection is the pronounced and superfluous front wheel arch. The front end, though, definately needs an exorcism!!
#1240 of 1532
Re: 2009 ACURA TL FWD or SHAWD? VERDICT......... [bodble2] by billyperks2
Nov 24, 2008 (1:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bodble2 (Nov 24, 2008 11:12 am)

To clarify- I need the AWD version, no more FWD with than many horses for me.
#1241 of 1532
Re: 2009 ACURA TL FWD or SHAWD? VERDICT......... [golfrski] by traumeri
Nov 24, 2008 (5:25 pm)
Reply

Replying to: golfrski (Nov 23, 2008 5:29 am)

I completely agree with you, and would argue that the front reflectors on FWD looks better than the open ducts (on light colors) than the SHAWD...giving the front elements a more cohesive look. Both Edmunds and R&T reported virtually identical 0-60 and 1/4mi #'s for FWD vs AWD, confirming my personal test drive experience.
 
There are some AWD ownders in Acurazine that claim after breaking in they were able to get ~5.6s in the 0-60 but again per Acura the AWD is at best 0.3s faster in the 0-60 and probably due to the torque-limiter clearly stated for the FWD only.
 
To me the biggest detractor for the FWD is the undersized 17" wheels.
golfrski, did you think about changing out the 17" OEM wheels for the 18" or 19"? I'm hoping the dealer has some 18" OEM from ownders opting to upgrade the 19" but not sure how much it would impact the ride.
#1242 of 1532
TL vs. CC vs. G37 by sweendogy
Nov 24, 2008 (6:14 pm)
Reply
http://blogs.edmunds.com/strategies/2008/11/sport-sedan-shootout-two-wannabes-on- e-winner.html?tid=edmunds.h..topfeatures.sportsedans.0.*
 
Looks do kill--
#1243 of 1532
Re: TL vs. CC vs. G37 [sweendogy] by bodble2
Nov 24, 2008 (10:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sweendogy (Nov 24, 2008 6:14 pm)

I wonder if the handful of people on these boards who tried to say with a straight face that the TL looks good are still sticking to their gun? This is just one big, bloated sedan with very awkward looking front and back end. Whoever buys one is buying inspite of its looks. No one will buy it for its looks, which is a complete 180 from the previous generation.
#1244 of 1532
TL vs. 328i by habitat1
Nov 25, 2008 (4:27 am)
Reply
I'm not trying to convince anyone else what to buy. But a freind of mine who had an RL coming off lease ended up with a new 2009 328i in spite of the Acura dealer doing everything he could to keep him in the family.
 
And, sorry guys, the notion that one is an "aggressive driver" and finds the FWD, automatic transmission base TL a "sporty" car?? Are you fantasizing? Perhaps you are "aggressive" in attitude, but you certainly don't appear to appreciate the finer points of handling, braking, steering and controlling your own gearshifts. I own a 2004 TL 6-speed with the sport suspension and Brembo brakes and, in spite of those benefits, it is still more than a handful when you goose it too much trying to accelerate while turning. I don't consider myself an "aggessive" driver, but I appreciate "precision" and driving my friends 328i manual was INFINITELY more satisfying than any slushbox, FWD TL.
 
So shop around. It seems that some people are attributing qualities to the TL (at least the FWD, automatic model) that are way beyond reality, at least in the "sportiness" department. If you are buying it for other reasons, fine. But call a spade a spade. And if you really do value driving dynamics, do a "real" test drive of the 328i 6-speed sport. It may have 60 less horsepower on paper, but it will run circles around a base TL and remind you what "fun to drive" means.
#1245 of 1532
Re: TL vs. 328i [habitat1] by jpdisarro
Nov 25, 2008 (7:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: habitat1 (Nov 25, 2008 4:27 am)

Can you comment on the 328 xi?
 
I live in an area where RWD is not a good option, so I am forced to look for FWD or AWD. From what I have read, the 328xi is very underpowered when saddled with the weight of the AWD system and also loses much of its nimbleness. The 335xi has enough power, but I am not interested in spending $50k on 3 series.

Messages Page 125 of 154
1
...
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
...
154
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement