Sign In Join 



Acura TL 2009 -

1532 messages,  Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 11:05 AM

You are in the Acura TL Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Acura TL, Sedan


Messages Page 123 of 154
1
...
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
...
154
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1214 of 1532
Re: Uglier in Person! [vaughn4] by bodble2
Nov 10, 2008 (3:24 pm)
Reply

Replying to: vaughn4 (Nov 10, 2008 1:29 pm)

I pretty much had the same first impression as you --- the car's bulk, the standard 17" wheels are undersized, the big schnoz of a grill, etc. However, I probably will test-drive the SH-AWD version. If the drive blows me away, AND my dealer gives me a killer deal on my trade, then maybe. If not, then I'll drive my current TL for another year, pass it down to my kids, and look seriously at a 3 or 1 series Bimmer of some form.
#1215 of 1532
alternatives by gry4
Nov 11, 2008 (3:51 am)
Reply
For the same 41K you can also look at a 2008 Mercedes 350 4-Matic or 2007 BMW 530XI each with under 15K miles. The Mercedes drove like vanilla quiet machine the the 530 presents an interesting choice. Acura has the luxury and the beak, BMW has the performance.
#1216 of 1532
Re: alternatives [gry4] by gry4
Nov 11, 2008 (8:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: gry4 (Nov 11, 2008 3:51 am)

By "TL" I mean the SH-AWD with the Tech package
#1217 of 1532
Re: 2009 Acura TL by wbarch
Nov 13, 2008 (7:32 am)
Reply
Saw the 09 TL in person recently. Have to say it might be the ugliest looking car I have ever seen. Definitely the worst looking lux type sport sedan out there. I agree with what one of the previous posters said about the design team and add they should commit hari-kari if they had any honor. Acura couldn't discount this enough to interest me.
#1219 of 1532
New Insideline Full Test with slow 0-60 #s by traumeri
Nov 14, 2008 (11:08 pm)
Reply
6.7s for both FWD and AWD despite bigger engine. Compared to 5.2s for the 335i, 5.5s for the 535i, and 5.4s for the G35. I am suprised Acura is willing to give up what seems like a substantial amount of performance prowess in the segment. Whether or not it is relevant for day-to-day driving is one thing, but it still serves as a comparison tool in a competitive segment.
 
Interesting to note also that Acura reportedly said that the 09 AWD is 0.3s faster than the outgoing Type-S, which would put the the Type-S ~7s but that seems awfully slow even for a 5AT type-S.
 
Any thoughts?
#1220 of 1532
Re: New Insideline Full Test with slow 0-60 #s [traumeri] by jpdisarro
Nov 15, 2008 (4:32 pm)
Reply

Replying to: traumeri (Nov 14, 2008 11:08 pm)

Edmunds only guessed that the AWD version will have the same acceleration due to the added weight; they did not actually test the AWD version, so their estimate could be incorrect. If the AWD version is 0.3 sec faster than the previous Type-S, it would have a 0-60 time around 6 sec.
#1221 of 1532
Extra / Spare Key by drmike29
Nov 15, 2008 (9:17 pm)
Reply
I recently purchased the 09 TL TECH (w/keyless entry & start). I had grown accustomed to carrying a spare key in my wallet for emergency use when traveling. While I'm sure that Roadside Assistance could somehow open your car door if the key fob were lost, how would you be able to 'drive away' if the keys were lost out of town?
Mike
#1222 of 1532
Re: New Insideline Full Test with slow 0-60 #s [jpdisarro] by traumeri
Nov 15, 2008 (9:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jpdisarro (Nov 15, 2008 4:32 pm)

Road & Track just did their full test of TL SHAWD and posted 6.3s but also noted that the FWD TL was only 0.1s off, thereby confirming Insideline's findings.
 
Anyway, I test drove the SHAWD today and compared to my FWD test drive a couple of months ago I did not feel any noticeable accel gains at any speed. This is not a deal-breaker but certainly disappointing. Performance-wise this places the TL at the bottom of the pack (A4 2.0T, ES350), but I was hoping the new "advanced" TL should drift toward the middle instead.....
#1223 of 1532
Re: New Insideline Full Test with slow 0-60 #s [traumeri] by bodble2
Nov 15, 2008 (10:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: traumeri (Nov 15, 2008 9:59 pm)

But I have a feeling Acura's objective with the bigger motor in the AWD model is simply to compensate for the added weight, rather than to offer a high-performance alternative. In your test drive, did you notice that AWD eliminated torque steer?

Messages Page 123 of 154
1
...
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
...
154
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement