Sign In Join 



Mazda CX-9 Navigation Features and Questions

131 messages,  Last post on Oct 09, 2009 at 8:37 AM

You are in the Mazda CX-9 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Mazda CX-9


Messages Page 9 of 14
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
...
14
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#72 of 131
trouble programming "home" in destination menu by badself
May 22, 2008 (8:44 pm)
Reply
What am I missing?
 
I've been trying to program my home address into the "home" section of the destination menu; however, it is greyed out and does not respond to my touch prompts. Only the first three sections are highlighted and operational (i.e. "address", "point of interest", and "SOS emergency".
 
The initial navigation setup was performed by the dealer, so I cannot state with certainty that the unit was activated properly, but it probably was.
 
Could somebody please point me to the solution?
#73 of 131
Re: trouble programming "home" in destination menu [badself] by howardru
May 29, 2008 (4:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: badself (May 22, 2008 8:44 pm)

Same problem. Brand new CX-9 brought home today.
 
Have you found a solution?
 
Thanks
#75 of 131
Re: trouble programming "home" in destination menu [badself] by howardru
May 30, 2008 (3:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: badself (May 22, 2008 8:44 pm)

I finally found the method to set the HOME deep down on another website for the CX-7. It's very similar to mine.
 
First, you'll want to set a regular memory point for your current home address. You'll see why later.
 
1) Hit Menu Button
2) Select Address Book
3) Select Memory Points/Home
4) Select List
5) Select Change until "Home" is shown at the title area
6) Select Home from list (it's the only item shown)
7) Map appears with "Edit Home Position" as the title
 
At this point, the Home setting stuck.
 
According to this other website you have to do the following, which was not required on mine.
 
Possibly...
You must use the joystick move the cursor to the coordinates where you want to set the Home position. If you've set the memory point for your home address, it's as easy as scrolling over to that point, aiming the crosshair to the point, and hitting Enter. Home point is now set!
#77 of 131
Re: trouble programming "home" in destination menu [howardru] by seloo
Jun 01, 2008 (1:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: howardru (May 30, 2008 3:05 am)

Just a question.
 
Does it make sense to purchase a $2000 NAV option, when you can get a good text to speech GPS for less than $200? Is the factory installation 10 times better?
#79 of 131
Re: trouble programming "home" in destination menu [seloo] by howardru
Jun 02, 2008 (2:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: seloo (Jun 01, 2008 1:12 pm)

Clearly the navigation system is inferior to any Garmin on Magellan system however, the onscrean display for music and MP3s is nice. Having this option keeps it on par with more luxury brands (as long as you don't show them the screen) and increases the re-sale value.
#80 of 131
Re: trouble programming "home" in destination menu [seloo] by kbedwards
Jun 02, 2008 (8:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: seloo (Jun 01, 2008 1:12 pm)

Does it make sense? No. Is the factory installed Nav better than a $200 GPS? Depends on how you use it. You would have to double or more that $200 to get a Garmin unit that will allow you to do routing like the Mazda's unit does. Plus built in bluetooth, plus voice recognitiont, etc.
 
Also the built in units tend to be faster...I never have to wait for a sat lock, but I do on my Garmin.
 
So no, it's not 10x better than a $200 standalone unit, and in MANY feature comparisons, it's actually worse (POI's are horrible, voice recognition is bad, not easy/clear how to upgrade to new maps, resolution of maps is awful, no 3D view for those who like it, interface plain and simple SUCKS)
     
But, it's not about functionality, it's about integration. No wires going everywhere, no worries about someone stealing your GPS, or having to remove the unit to prevent someone stealing, no extra bulk in your dashboard space. MUCH bigger screen than you get on typical separate units (this is the biggies imo). Integrated with your sound system, rear view camera, etc.
 
I weighed the two options for a while before plunking down for that option, and the reason I went for the built in is because they packaged it with the power rear door, which my wife loves (comes in very handy in several situations).
 
So it's not even really a $2,000 option, it's more like a $1000 or less one, depending on how much value is placed on the power rear door. Also includes the rear camera integration, which is priced at $500 or so. So $2,000 minus $500 for rear camera, minus let's say $500 for power rear, and you're at $1000.
 
If they had not paired the rear camera and pwr rear door with the option, I most likely would have gone the Garmin route instead. Obviously they know what they're doing wrt to marketing the options.
#81 of 131
Re: NAVI by ceric
Jun 02, 2008 (8:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: howardru (Jun 02, 2008 2:48 am)

I would say CX-9's navigation is almost 90% of what a Lexus navigation offers.
If you don't believe me go check it out yourself. What is missing (the 10%) is the integration of ultra-sound screen, TPMS, etc. The navigation GUI is a bit simplified than the Lexus one. Other than that, both navigation systems are from Denso. Lexus/Toyota has not been known for offering the best navigation system (I believe Acura's is the best among all OE navigation systems).
 
Resale values? No, people who buy used vehicles are actually scared of the fancy electronics. Do you know how much it costs to replace the MFD (multi-function display)? At least $2000, if anything goes wrong.
 
Why OE navigation. Yes, you can argue all you want about your portable being better (I got one myself, also). However, consider the following differences an OE system has but your portable does not...
(1) dead-reckoning (deduced-reckoning): OE system has inputs of steering angle and speed data from OBDII that enables it to continue projecting where you are fairly accurately in places where signal is weak or blocked (such as tunnels, among high buildings, etc.).
(2) safety: I have seen many different ways to install a portable unit. I am not really comfortable with any of them considering the danger it poses in the events of a roll-over or just emergency braking. The portable units become projectiles that could hurt occupants in the vehicles.
(3) integration: there is a cost for a better integration. An OE system integrate many aspects of the electronics much cleanly than add-ons. One needs to pay for such clean integration.
To be fair, the $2500 also includes power-liftgate, and rearview camera. The true cost of the navigation is about $1500, which also includes VOICE command, which your portable system is unlikely to have either. So, the comparison is not so straightforward, IMHO.
 
As long as one is aware of the risk, the decision is one's to make.

Messages Page 9 of 14
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
...
14
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement