Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Automotive News & Views United Automobile Workers of America (UAW)
16663 messages, Last post on Nov 08, 2009 at 9:32 PM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: dallasdude1 (Jan 24, 2009 5:13 pm) MIT. In any case, glad you read up on what Gresham's Law is. Don't you see the analogous situation in labor pricing? If we arbitrarily command (by fiat) that all workers shoud be paid the same regardless the productivity of each, the "good ones" who are worth more will exit the system, and the "bad ones" who are worth less than the command price will have an incentive to stay. In any case, gold standard or any standard is not pre-requisite for Gresham's Law. GL applies any time there is a discrepancy between command value vs. intrinsic value. The pre-1965 90% and pre-1971 40% silver coins have disappeared from the circulation, so have the pre-1982 copper pennies in recent years. Ironicly, this current monetary contraction is so severe that the pre-1982 copper penny's metal value is falling below the command value again in the last few weeks, for the first time in over a decade. |
|
|
Replying to: dallasdude1 (Jan 25, 2009 6:56 am) That is a lot of bunk. If that was the case you would not have NLRB elections were 2 or more unions compete for the same workers. I happen to be a victim of just that kind of brotherhood. I signed an IBEW card in 1970. I ended up a Teamster as they slid in and wined and dined enough telco operators to steal the election from the IBEW. I then got involved in the Teamsters and watched the Operating engineers weasel into the Teamster's territory and they both ended up losing the NLRB election. Your simplistic view of Union labor is laughable. After you are affiliated with 3 different Unions over 46 years, get back to me with your Utopian view of Union brotherhood. Why is the UAW into aircraft industry. There are several related Unions representing different aspects of the industry. It is because the UAW is like an octopus, stealing workers anywhere they can. Which Union did the UAW crush to get the black jack dealers in Las Vegas? Are we now omitting Ford? Aren't they UAW? I will include them when Ford begs for my tax dollars as the GM & Chrysler along with the UAW. Congress is not worried about the domestic auto industry. They are weighing the value of supporting the UAW. Quite frankly your 400k votes are meaningless. |
|
|
Replying to: dallasdude1 (Jan 25, 2009 6:41 am) Its called the American dream" Dallas, in case you didn't notice it's impossible to become reality, that's why it's called a DREAM. "Envy is what the corporate owned media is counting on. They seek to foster public opinion in order to bring in their agenda. If you get yourself a union and quit worrying about what others are getting, you would be ahead. " It's the total opposite. Envy is what UAW is counting on to make strikes and demand more. They'll never quit envying what others are making. If one gets into the union and quit worrying about what others make then it'll be the end of competition, the end if improvement, which will result in the end of rising quality. They'll never be ahead. I sure as hell don't want such incompetence in US.
|
|
|
Replying to: dallasdude1 (Jan 24, 2009 5:07 pm) You have been arguing that unions give workers higher wage, haven't you? Then how come they haven't saved a year's cost of living or more after decades under "UAW protection"? "Two years" is part of "a year's cost of living or more." Do I have to explain what "or more" means? Do I have to remind you that you were the one saying we only need to look at one year, when it was asked whether you were so pessimistic about UAW member's employability that they might stay unemployed for the rest of their lives.
|
|
|
that send GM and Chrysler down the pit. GM and Chrysler's own management boards are the other major reason. This latter part is where Ford is starting to get it right with. Many of you seem to think that we're blaming it all on UAW. No, as I said so many times before both the UAW and the management are responsible for their mess. Now the real problem is the taxpayers who aren't involved are forced to support them by the means of bailout. Ford still have my support as the only domestic automaker with no bailout in hand, however if the UAW, by any reason ask for government support that'll end my support as well. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: m4d_cow (Jan 25, 2009 7:00 am) The GM bankruptcy (if it comes to being) is but just, one bankruptcy, since they have the "separate entity" status to limit the liability to GM and not to the shareholders assets. Your way ahead of the game. Many UAW represented worker may be living check to check. They may file for bankruptcy and or be foreclosed upon. My thinking is that those will come in the near future and add to the already supply of foreclosures. Not to mention the unemployment rolls. If these people really saved that much, why are they still declining pay cuts when it's the only way to survive? Nothing has been proposed to the membership as I see it or to my knowledge. They have yet to vote on any proposal whatsoever. You're with UAW, while I have no clue how much you saved but making payments on 3 mortgage is no small issue. This shows that UAW workers are very generously paid. Well paid people yet at the same time most are living a life way beyond their reach. Hence when the turmoil hits them they go bankrupt right away, what happened to their savings? Everyone is not in the same boat as to assets. Then again, if you see the turmoil as an opportunity to buy a home/auto, there has never been a better time. My case is that wise investments prior to the current melt down, put me a favorable position. I'm not alone and many will and have come out to do bottom fishing. GM is twisting in the breeze, saying it won't make it through year end without help, but the Bush administration, which has been liberal with aid to anyone who can pretend to be remotely connected to the financial system, has been consistently tightfisted about helping anyone who probably didn't vote Republican, such as auto-workers and people who lost their homes (recall various Republican initiatives to scrub people who had lost their homes from voter rolls). Despite the fact that most voters would find GM workers more deserving than investment bankers (at a minimum, they could not be deemed to have created the mess they are in, or have brought down the entire economy along with them), there is an important issue not getting enough attention: the problems with bankruptcy laws. These laws will cause others (including many autoworkers) into more bankruptcies. Suppliers and even more will feel the ripple effect. Then the workers of these other companies will in turn file for bankruptcy. When do we say that GM is too big to allow to go under? I feel that this is not the time to play politics and if we do so, it would prolong the current crisis. Not to mention what would have happened if the banks were allowed to liquidate. Lets just see if this so call "orderly bankruptcy" is a possibility? Just how many companies and people does it effect? What are the effects of displacement and dislocation of companies of this size? |
|
|
In this scenario, should GM and Chrysler go under, it's to my believe that another company will emerge and salvage the best GM still got left. Naturally, with the way things go at UAW I seriously doubt any of those new owners will ever agree to the UAW wage standard. If the UAW refuse to negotiate further I dare bet those companies will set the new plants down south where unions have no power. Another possible outcome is the death of UAW. As more and more leave the UAW membership to get a job the UAW may experience a slow agonizing death. We're in deep trouble and UAW expect us to help revive the economy. Well, the UAW simply forgets that it has the power to help as well, either they forget or they simply want everyone else to make sacrifices except UAW. |
|
|
You are missing the positive ripple effect of Ch-11 bankruptcy protection: 1. The high interest debts will be written down. So the company will be much more viable. 2. If parts of the company does get liquidated, the resources and labor will be freed up for other opportunities.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: wiseman (Jan 25, 2009 7:27 am) Does the higher wage fuel this economy and that of other nations? Absolutely and therefore its a good thing. Then how come they haven't saved a year's cost of living or more after decades under "UAW protection"? How do you know they haven't? I'm UAW and have more than that saved. "Two years" is part of "a year's cost of living or more." Do I have to explain what "or more" means? Or more means that we will be in this more than two years, and if we use your logic that we walk away from our obligations, such as a mortgage, this would never ever end. You, sir, frighten me. Your outlook is that of one which would make things worse and in no time the same banking institutions would be back fro more bail-out money, since they are getting homes back at an alarming rate. So, I see your solutions as problematic at best. Do I have to remind you that you were the one saying we only need to look at one year, when it was asked whether you were so pessimistic about UAW member's employability that they might stay unemployed for the rest of their lives. After unemployment runs out, they are excluded from being counted as far as the unemployment rate is concern? Are those who are under employed, such as working for Walmart less than 40 hours, included in the unemployment rate?
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views United Automobile Workers of America (UAW)
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
