You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
United Automobile Workers of America (UAW)

16706 messages, Last post on Nov 30, 2009 at 12:18 PM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: dallasdude1 (Dec 30, 2008 9:19 am) Are you serious???? After months on this board you still don't know??? Do you even read anything here? Let's try again then: It is called "non-competitive labor cost". If car brand A costs 20K to make and sells for 21K, the company makes 1K/car. If car brand B costs 22K to make but it has to firesell it for 18K then the company loses 4K per car. If coincidentally company B overall cost of labor is 3K per car more than company A and all other costs are comparable, then that cost the labor is directly responsible for Company B loss. If removed, Company B could add $1000 to the cost of its car in refinements and improvements so it can actually charge the same or maybe more than Company A and start making money. That cost is direct link between Company B success or demise. It's not all labor's fault, as it's really the management who should make sure those costs are in line, but if the labor chooses to cover its ears and eyes in mud and use its power to simply milk the beast to its death, you cannot then shed the responsibility from them. Or perhaps you would like to blame the whole sub prime mess on the tellers at the banks? Perhaps not on tellers, but on those mortgage officers who would tell people to lie on their applications to get approved - yeah, I would. But, to be clear - I never said it was "all" their fault. If you read me, you would find out I actually put majority of blame (60%) on the management and minority (30%) on UAW with marginal participation (10%) of politicians.
|
|
|
Replying to: marsha7 (Dec 30, 2008 9:52 am) In South Carolina, it's just about ended. WISTV Now, what's going to happen if SC and other southern states go begging for bailout money? Will the northern (UAW backed) senators tell them to let BMW bail them out? With all the incentives SC gave to BMW ($150M - link), how come it has the nation's third-worst unemployment rate? |
|
|
Replying to: dallasdude1 (Dec 30, 2008 9:31 am) But why? I'm a classical liberal - just like you. |
|
|
Replying to: dallasdude1 (Dec 30, 2008 9:19 am) This sums up the problem of the UAW in a nutshell. The UAW worries only about themselves - the easiest possible work with the highest possible compensation. The UAW views the company's health as a management problem. At most non-union companies and many unionized companies, all of the employees see their part in the success of the company.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: dino001 (Dec 30, 2008 10:37 am) Unfortunately the Toyota/Honda darlings of the business schools aren't doing too well either. As the prevailing wages go in any given area, the transplants must compete with the local wages, the non union folks get a boost to their pay due to there being competing market forces out there seeking labor too. You have to be aware that the UAW has on many occasions made concessions. The two tier wage scale, the early retirements, and others to make GM more competitive. At some point management has to fess up to their transgressions. Just because your from some elite country club lineage doesn't mean you have the skills and or ability to run a major corporation. Besides, the six sigma/lean mentality has been in the Big Three for years now. The Toyota/Honda executives are bailing by the day as they see the CEO orgy going on in this nation. Perhaps not on tellers, but on those mortgage officers who would tell people to lie on their applications to get approved - yeah, I would. Some history from the past. Deregulate and they will come, supply side, Reagan Legacy. As if the S&L didn't teach us anything. This will go down in history as ENRON era. One could write an entire book on these con artist impersonating capitalist. Imagine a billion dollar stadium built by taxpayer for an egotistical owner of the Cowboys. Perhaps you would like to get one of those valet parking, fast food cook, or any of the small wage jobs. These jobs will tax the county social services, just as the Walmart jobs cost $2000 per employee in social services. Where are the savings? Its a hidden cost, just as are those super toxic dumps of years ago.
|
|
|
Replying to: dallasdude1 (Dec 30, 2008 11:07 am) I never said it's all UAW. What I I have a problem with is refusal to acknowledge any problem on part of the labor organizations. I simply protest "iIt's all the Wall Street/country club fat cat crowd to blame and Gettelfinger is practically a saint for fighting for our free Viagra prescriptions" attitudes.
|
|
|
Replying to: steve_ (Dec 30, 2008 10:41 am) I'm doing my part buying UTW (United Tobacco Workers) SC-grown tobacco products.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: tlong (Dec 30, 2008 10:55 am) That by definition is the CEO. So tell me why the CEO earns more? Then tell me why the CEO's in America earn more worldwide? Then tell me if you would like to be a rank and file union member or a CEO?
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: kernick (Dec 30, 2008 11:24 am) I've always wondered, if they don't want people smoking/dipping in certain cities. Why do those same cities allow the sale of tobacco products? Then if they got everyone to quit, how would they replace those tobacco taxes? |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: marsha7 (Dec 30, 2008 9:52 am) Funny that Japan/Germany/Korea think of America as a third world country with labor markets to be exploited. Walmart, got the message when they saw themselves in the courts. Their actions may have been tolerated in some other countries, but the legal system has them shaking here. Outsource them Walmart jobs! Its only a matter of time for the rebirth of unionism/UAW. Newton's third law of motion has just happened and come 01-20-09 your jaw is going to drop. Just remember how far and how long to the right we were. Just as soon as the masses learned to read they had to invent public relations/spin. Did big business want everyone to read? Now they have consolidated the media and have many a country bumpkin snowed. When will you see that the CEO is but a human as yourself and that these aristocrats don't have your best interests in mind. If it was as you say there would be no UAW cars on the streets and these brilliant CEO's wouldn't be begging for welfare. Maybe their stupidity comes from inbreeding within the same ole country club crowd? |
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
United Automobile Workers of America (UAW)
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle


Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats