Sign In Join 



United Automobile Workers of America (UAW)

16705 messages,  Last post on Nov 25, 2009 at 6:56 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News


Messages Page 669 of 1672
1
...
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
...
1672
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#6673 of 16705
Re: back to the topic [steve_] by gagrice
Dec 22, 2008 (9:07 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Dec 22, 2008 8:32 pm)

Here is how Gettlefinger got that last contract through. Just as I have said. The long time members stuck it to the new hires. They did not give up anything in their package. That is not being a team player. That causes nothing but dissension on the floor of the plant. When the new guy is making $14 per hour next to some lazy old dude making $30 per hour. Unions do not survive with that kind of double standard.
 
form the article:
How did he sell the concessions to his members? None of the current workers lost much of anything. They kept their pay, and their health-care benefits are still first-rate. Anyone losing a job got buyouts averaging more than $100,000, and they typically head into the pension rolls.
 
Cuts should have been across the board. That would be a Union, based on equality. There is no equality left in the UAW. It is the old guys vs the new hires. A horrible way to run a Union. Here is more on the subject including Gettlefinger blocking the GM Chrysler merger. Which is probably for the best.
 
Most industry observers believe Gettelfinger will fight to the death to keep wages where they are. But under threat of extinction and government prodding, he may well ditch the JOBS bank. Gettelfinger may even have to persuade his members to pay more for health care. When asked about it, he didn't rule it out: "I'll just have to wait and see what the government wants," he said. How about a GM-Chrysler merger? "No," he said firmly.
 
The problem is, Gettelfinger has a tough hand. If he goes on strike, "he loses the country," says Ned Hill, dean of the College of Urban Affairs at Cleveland State University. So he will have to hope the Obama Administration is lenient. "At this point, his cards are all political," Hill says.

 
I think he has already lost the country. I don't know anyone in CA that feels sorry for the UAW. They are more concerned about the lost jobs here in our state and the fact that CA is near bankruptcy. That will make the automakers going out of business insignificant.
#6674 of 16705
Re: Interesting Article... [jimbres] by jwalls
Dec 22, 2008 (9:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jimbres (Dec 22, 2008 8:09 pm)

Well said
#6677 of 16705
Re: Fail... [gagrice] by tlong
Dec 22, 2008 (10:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Dec 22, 2008 5:51 pm)

Nice Spin job. Maybe CNN will hire you
 
Well let's wait and see what the next 3 months bring. Will GM's market share increase, remain constant, or decrease? I predict it will decrease, but we have gas getting cheap so perhaps the worship of SUVs and Trucks will rise again and all will be good with the D3....until gas goes up again.
#6678 of 16705
Re: we can give to anyone but americans [dave8697] by tlong
Dec 22, 2008 (10:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dave8697 (Dec 22, 2008 6:22 pm)

My contention is that the differences in quality are not life changing.
 
So I'm sure you have an 18" TV at home as your primary set? After all, a big screen HDTV is not life changing.
 
However most people don't buy for life changing. They buy for desirable.
#6679 of 16705
Re: Interesting Article... [dave8697] by tlong
Dec 22, 2008 (10:56 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dave8697 (Dec 22, 2008 6:59 pm)

One day some will wake up and realize that the poor quality you claim US autos to have can't actually be found and that the above list is strongly contributed to when we buy keep sending money, we often have to borrow, to Japan.
  
The excellent US products already exist. When people get sick of the list above, the game will change. Just go on with your US bashing without ever stating a single fact to back it up.

 
You stated that we only need to increase percentages by a few points and it has much more effect than wage cuts for the UAW.
I stated that is easy to say and hard to do. What are the game changers?
 
You proceeded to list a bunch of economic problems and then rant about my supposed bashing of which there was none in my post.
 
So I'll ask again - how do you propose the market share increases by a few percentage points for the D3? What are the PRODUCTS that are going to be the game changers to do that?
 
You're ranting a lot but have not answered my question.
#6680 of 16705
Re: Fail... [gagrice] by tlong
Dec 22, 2008 (10:58 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Dec 22, 2008 7:21 pm)

All your ramblings over the last several postings have absolutely no bearing on the UAW or the bailout. So like I said before no one here has convinced me that the UAW is interested in saving the domestic automakers. So why should the rest of US?
 
I keep waiting for the UAW strike where they are protesting that they are not allowed to make a high enough quality vehicle, the parts don't fit right, and they don't want their names on poor vehicles.
 
Instead they kick the sick dog (GM) when it's down and looking like it may still be gasping for air.
#6681 of 16705
UAW & Manufacturers by netranger4
Dec 23, 2008 (3:00 am)
Reply
Although the UAW can be blamed for a portion of the problems which resulted in the necessity for a goverment bailout. The manufacturers ability, or lack of, to manage their companies plays an equally large part in the current situation.
 
The unwillingness to acknowledge any fault, and deflecting blame effortlessly by these supposedly capable executives on any target other than their ineptitude is beyond comprehension. Watching the body English of 2 of the Big 3 leaders and the UAW president during the Senate hearings revealed far more than their spoken words.
 
The ego punctures affected some more than others. Nothing is more painful than than finding that you aren't as clever, wise, proactive or dynamic as your self-created image indicates, then having to listen to that being televised all over the world. Ouch!
 
Guess what? The 'circumstances beyond our control' excuse just don't play well any more.
#6682 of 16705
Re: we can give to anyone but americans [tlong] by circlew
Dec 23, 2008 (4:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: tlong (Dec 22, 2008 10:51 pm)

Look at their market value. Market share has to go lower to survive.
 
Regards,
OW

Messages Page 669 of 1672
1
...
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
...
1672
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement