Sign In Join 



United Automobile Workers of America (UAW)

16706 messages,  Last post on Nov 30, 2009 at 12:18 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News


Messages Page 625 of 1672
1
...
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
...
1672
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#6232 of 16706
Re: [dallasdude1] by jimbres
Dec 12, 2008 (7:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dallasdude1 (Dec 12, 2008 7:05 pm)

So why was the reason to enact the Sherman Anti Trust Act? To imprison Eugene Debs? Is this the Darwinism of capitalism?
 
You've lost me, my friend. Are you PWI'ing again? My previous post was a response to points that you had made about the New Deal - specifically about how New Deal programs had purportedly pulled the economy out of the Depression. But the Sherman Act was passed in 1890, more than 40 years earlier, & is thus unrelated to the earlier discussion. If there's a point buried in this post, I'm afraid that I don't see it.
#6233 of 16706
Remember PATCO by dallasdude1
Dec 12, 2008 (7:29 pm)
Reply
The "financial" bailout will end up in the trillions. The potential Big3 bailout should be 40 billion or so. If we are willing to toss 1,000,000,000,000+ to wall street you would think that 40,000,000,000 would be small potatoes. Why is the average american more concerned with the money that would be used for salaries of blue collar folks then they are the 25x amount at least that will be spent on the lazy, greedy wall street morons who could care less about them?
 
It looks like the UAW is making a stand. They are tired of making all the concessions while the management fat cats who have managed the company poorly get rich. Seems like a reasonable position to me. Let the management fat cats take cuts to their salary/benefits in order to save the company.
 
Alternatively, maybe the UAW president has been in touch with some politicians who have assured him a bailout is coming so he comes out firing in order to take the initiative. Negotiating 101.
 
I'm so tired of all this non sense about the autoworkers making Joe the plumber money. Say is isn't so Joe?
#6234 of 16706
Re: NO DEAL! [tlong] by chikoo
Dec 12, 2008 (7:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tlong (Dec 12, 2008 3:30 pm)

>I doubt the UAW likes the idea of performance-based bonuses.
 
Even I would oppose it if the company I was working for is a private organization. The owners can cook the books in whatever fashion they like and the labor has to suffer.
 
But in a publicly held company where the CEO is also paid performance bonus, all the employees should be given a bonus on the same standard. By the way, the fortune 500 company my wife works for, and one which has not made a loss yet, but still sold off the corporate jets as the markets deteriorated, has performance based bonus across all employees, which is based upon how much profit the company made. She can get anywhere from 5 to 10%. This time around she is looking at 2% at the most.
#6235 of 16706
cooter by marsha7
Dec 12, 2008 (7:29 pm)
Reply
"Huntsville may be a more "upscale" city, whereas Detroit is, well, um, a city. It's a given that taxes are more in Mi."...
 
cooter, I do seem to like your quotes and have a blast responding to them...even if I don't make any sense...
 
Detroit is a slum, plain and simple...it was like that when I went there in 1980 and even worse when I left in 1990...stupid damn mayors all screamed racism, when they only had to look in the mirror to understand why working people of ALL races were deserting the town like a tornado just struck...lousy management and some of the highest taxes around...a mere $60K home had taxes around $2-3K, and what you got for your money was affirmative action of the worst incompetent people available...
 
The best way to see Detroit is in your rear view mirror...I defy ANYONE to find anything good to say about the City of Detroit, and rocky doesn't count...
#6236 of 16706
One of the by marsha7
Dec 12, 2008 (7:36 pm)
Reply
other reasons that WWII got us out of the Depression is the one reason no one likes to say, but truth is truth...
 
The war removed hundreds of thousands, maybe millions of (mostly) men from the US job market and sent them overseas to fight, and many of them were simply killed and permanently removed from possible job rolls...the war took our citizens in the prime of their lives and sent them out of the country...those that remained were working on the war effort...by the time the survivors came back in 1945, I am quite sure that the available pool of workers was much smaller than it was from 1935-1941...that is another way to alter employment, have a large portion of the workers simply killed as casualties of war...cruel thinking???...yes, but that does not change the fact that many potential job takers were permanently removed from the job rolls thanks to D-Day and other battles of WWII...
 
They shall, however, ALWAYS be remembered as heroes who gave the ultmate sacrifice, but they were removed from the employment rolls nonetheless...
#6237 of 16706
Re: I copied my post from another topic [marsha7] by chikoo
Dec 12, 2008 (7:39 pm)
Reply

Replying to: marsha7 (Dec 12, 2008 7:08 pm)

>Then there really only WILL be 2 people who will buy Big 3...lemko and rockylee...
 
U forgot dallasdude1. I believe he is associated with the GM plant in Arlington. Maybe not.
#6238 of 16706
jimbres by marsha7
Dec 12, 2008 (7:41 pm)
Reply
The reason to bring up the Sherman Anti-Trust Act is because he likes Teddy Roosevelt, the much better Roosevelt IMO...
 
"Walk softly and carry a big stick"...you may quote me on that as marsha7...oh no, it's Joe Biden!!!...I'm caught plagiarizing again...
#6239 of 16706
Re: [jimbres] by dallasdude1
Dec 12, 2008 (7:43 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jimbres (Dec 12, 2008 7:28 pm)

Your argument is that capitalism left alone will never ever go wrong and that the markets will correct themselves. We have a history of this not being so. You have to have money to fuel the economy. Fiscal and monetary policy are govt's tools. Unfortunately they are sometimes used as political tools. After the dot com bust we began another lowering process, rather than letting the economy go into mild recession. Bush wanted to be both a good times and war times president. You are about left with govt spending as the only means to fuel this economy as interest rates are nearing zero. Sherman was passed to bust up the greedy monopoly seeking crooks/industrialist. You have no idea what these fools did to the workers. Consumerism was food, shelter, and clothing. Unions changed that. They had no intention of making model A's or T's for the masses. The UAW created the great middle class and consumerism we enjoy today. Even non union workers enjoy the prevailing wage, overtime, weekends, holidays, and much more. To compete for the best labor out there they must offer as good or better.
#6240 of 16706
Re: NO DEAL! [chikoo] by dallasdude1
Dec 12, 2008 (7:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: chikoo (Dec 12, 2008 7:29 pm)

I doubt the UAW likes the idea of performance-based bonuses.
 
You lost me. Is that good or bad performance or both?
#6241 of 16706
Re: NO DEAL! [dallasdude1] by chikoo
Dec 12, 2008 (7:52 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dallasdude1 (Dec 12, 2008 7:47 pm)

>I doubt the UAW likes the idea of performance-based bonuses.
  
>You lost me. Is that good or bad performance or both?
 
r u even serious? For a knowledgeable guy like you, this question is quite unexpected. Of course it is both. Bad performance? No Bonus + No salary raise.
Good performance? Salary Raise + Bonus.

Messages Page 625 of 1672
1
...
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
...
1672
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement