Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Automotive News & Views United Automobile Workers of America (UAW)
16705 messages, Last post on Nov 25, 2009 at 6:56 PM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: dallasdude1 (Dec 06, 2008 10:01 am) The pharmaceutical industry has run up an $800 million tab for lobbying Congress and backing political candidates over the past seven years, making it the "goliath" of American lobbying groups. The tab breaks down to $675 million in lobbying, $87 million in campaign donations to federal candidates and political parties and $10 million for advocacy groups, according to the Center for Public Integrity http://www.fiercebiotech.com/story/pharma-industry-emerges-as-nation-s-biggest-l- obbyist/2005-07-07
|
|
|
Replying to: dallasdude1 (Dec 06, 2008 10:01 am) Update The Vette man pegged it with pharmaceuticals lobbyist. |
|
|
Replying to: dallasdude1 (Dec 06, 2008 9:56 am) Were they all legal and union tradesmen?
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: jimbres (Dec 06, 2008 9:43 am) Only if they are compensated if they make money and fined if they take foolish risks. I'm of the opinion that there are few good money managers out there. Most of these folks who can't make it in the sciences/engineering, change majors. 70% of the schools student bodies are in the business schools. You have no earthly idea of the scams being currently perpetrated on Wall Street right at the present. They buy shorting on a stock, they create a rumor, sell the shorting as the rumor mill factors in the rumor into the price, and they aggressively buy the stock. A spokesman comes out to dis-spell the rumor, mean while they have made money on shorting, and then again on the stock as the rumor is factored out of the price. Special 10% bonds for their filthy rich friends. Special deals for brokerage houses best customers. I could go on. But the point is that they would find/create a way to pocket social security money. Capital punishment is the only deterrent for these white collar criminals. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Dec 06, 2008 10:23 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: dallasdude1 (Dec 06, 2008 10:51 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: dallasdude1 (Dec 06, 2008 10:51 am) Since you put it that way I would say they were all Non union.  I will not defend the building practices in CA. They are atrocious. It would make both my Uncles and step dad roll over in their graves. A few independent small contractors build using good materials and practices. Most homes I have looked at do not have a straight wall in them. Not much residential Union work was used here in CA if any. |
|
|
Replying to: steve_ (Dec 06, 2008 10:57 am) I did not hear Gettlefinger offer any immediate help with the problems. All in the future. If GM is dead this month it would seem that the UAW would give immediate concessions to keep their head above water.
|
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Dec 06, 2008 11:07 am) It wouldn't take too many busloads of unemployed line workers to create havoc with a bunch of suppliers and it won't take too many GM buses to block the gates to the parking lots of Mercedes and Nissan. Dump the Big 3 on the curb and you may find that the social unrest isn't limited to Michigan. |
|
|
|
|
My years as an elected official of the UAW were misguided in that management went beyond what a reasonable person could expect. With good intension's I expected to have an adversarial relationship with the perceived wicked management. However, even if they said NO, they really meant that I needed to make a rational and sane case for my request. In doing so they showed concern and addressed issues in a timely manner. Many times dealing with issues that went beyond the workplace. So I don't understand the evil management myth. Its either the history of decades ago or just a lack of communication. If anything I see a need to address performance issues within the union membership. They understood that folks just have issues from home which sometime in their work history make them less than the best employee possible. They went above and beyond to be fair and offer many programs to deal with these issues. Divorce isn't the companies concern, but can effect the performance of an employee. Health issues, attendance, disrespect for others, doing the right thing, and all types of unacceptable behavior are taken into consideration and just discipline issued. They are running a business and have to expect that their employees add value to the business. I learned from them and respect their fairness. My professionalism and skills with people are much better since. Add to that the negotiating abilities and all was not a waste of time. However, it wasn't my forte. Never did they belittle me on any shortcomings. I have full confidence in management/labor relations and feel they are doing a fine job considering all they have to deal with. As a whole we all make our contribution to make the company one of the best places to work. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views United Automobile Workers of America (UAW)
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
