Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Automotive News & Views United Automobile Workers of America (UAW)
16705 messages, Last post on Nov 25, 2009 at 6:56 PM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: dallasdude1 (Dec 01, 2008 6:25 pm) I've owned several, and so have my friends. And our collective experience does not support your opinion. dallasdude: Second we do know that Cuba has kept all those old Amreican cars running all these years. Somehow, I doubt that Cuba, with its tropical climate, has had to apply salt to the roads because of snow and ice too many times over the past 50+ years. Also note that most of those American cars you see have been so heavily patched and modified to keep them running that they really bear little resemblance to their original state. Some of those cars don't even have their original drivetrains anymore. dallasdude: Regarding Honda CVT reliability, check out the Dept. of Energy long term testing of hybrids: Actually, considering that this is new technology, the record is hardly awful. Looking over the results, I note that the two 2006 Civics went for 147,000 and 153,000 with no transmission problems. The two 2005 Accord Hybrids went for 154,000 and 151,000 miles with no transmission problems. Two of the 2003 Civics had transmission problems at about 95,000 miles, The Insights also had transmission problems around that point, too. The logical conclusion is that Honda had transmission trouble with the early models, but it appears as though Honda has corrected said transmission troubles for the new models. The CVT transmission appears to be troublesome, which is hardly unique to Honda. Ask people who have had the misfortune of owning a Saturn Vue with the CVT...and that one didn't even feature a hybrid drivetrain.
|
|
|
Replying to: dallasdude1 (Dec 01, 2008 6:33 pm) You keep trying to suggest that because Bush was friends with Ken Lay, that he was responsible for Enron's collapse, and that Enron executives got away with fraud. This is false. Bush did not run Enron. He bears no responsibility for what happened. Second, Enron executives - including Ken Lay - were prosecuted and convicted during the Bush presidency. If you think that the president has no influence over who is and isn't prosecuted by federal attorneys, you are kidding yourself. Incidentally, the interview that you linked to noted that Lay was friends with Ann Richards, the Democratic governor of Texas, and he supported her bid for governor. Sooo...does this mean that she is responsible for what happened at Enron? I agree with you on one thing - you should stick to discussing the UAW. 
|
|
|
|
|
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081202/united_auto_workers_meeting.html - Local United Auto Workers leaders from across the U.S. will hold an emergency meeting in Detroit on Wednesday to discuss concessions the union could make to help auto companies get government loans. UAW leaders called the meeting Monday night in an e-mail, obtained by The Associated Press, to local union presidents and bargaining chairmen. Among the subjects to be discussed at the meeting will be the possibility of restructuring the union-administered health care fund so that the automakers can delay payments to the multibillion-dollar fund, according to a person familiar with the matter. The union leaders will also discuss potentially eliminating the jobs bank, in which laid-off workers keep receiving most of their pay. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the ...
|
|
|
Replying to: grbeck (Dec 02, 2008 8:54 am) I doubt that very many places in Cuba are more than 50 miles from the ocean and I suspect they have a lot of muddy roads there. There are a lot of good looking old cars there still in daily use. And a lot must look like this one. The UAW "deplores the limits on the freedom of the Cuban people -- including restrictions on workers who seek free trade unions." link
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: steve_ (Dec 02, 2008 9:38 am) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: imidazol97 (Dec 02, 2008 9:36 am) I hope there's enough time for all of them to drive to Detroit for the meeting. I wouldn't want a congressperson to be upset by finding out they flew in an, gasp, _airplane_. Especially if the plane were a small charter or jet owned by the Unions... Hmmm. Can someone check the FAA site to see if they're flying any Union owned jets around for this meeting? 
|
|
|
Replying to: imidazol97 (Dec 02, 2008 9:44 am) |
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Dec 02, 2008 8:25 am) |
|
|
Replying to: andre1969 (Dec 02, 2008 8:38 am) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views United Automobile Workers of America (UAW)
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
