Sign In Join 



United Automobile Workers of America (UAW)

16701 messages,  Last post on Nov 20, 2009 at 3:39 AM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News


Messages Page 565 of 1671
1
...
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
...
1671
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#5640 of 16701
Re: I'm Confused ROGELIOV [gagrice] by tlong
Nov 30, 2008 (11:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Nov 30, 2008 6:26 pm)

I want a bailout too!
 
Count me in! I've lost a lot of my retirement investments and I deserve to be made whole! Otherwise I'd have to work for years longer and we must take care of our retirees!
#5641 of 16701
Re: I'm Confused ROGELIOV [gagrice] by tlong
Nov 30, 2008 (11:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Nov 30, 2008 8:35 pm)

Just what does a story about a 3rd rate electronics junk store chain have to do with the mess the UAW has created for the Big 3?
 
And he told me I changed my subject on the creation of the middle class by the UAW!
#5642 of 16701
Re: DD, Out of touch on so many issues [gagrice] by tlong
Nov 30, 2008 (11:52 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Nov 30, 2008 8:50 pm)

If you made the claim that the UAW workers were the most overpaid in America, I would also agree.
 
Gettlefinger today said that the union costs are "now competitive". So I ask why the bailout is needed, and why the D3 can't make a competitive small car if their costs are so competitive?
#5643 of 16701
Re: DD, Out of touch on so many issues [tlong] by kipk
Dec 01, 2008 (4:13 am)
Reply

Replying to: tlong (Nov 30, 2008 11:52 pm)

At the senate hearings, GM said their over seas operations are strong and profitable.
 
If that be true, why can't they bring some of those profits here to see them through the crisis? Why can't they bring those "winning" vehicles here to sell and get back on track while tooling up to build them here?
 
I recently drove a rental Aveo sedan. Didn't care for the roller skate exterior treatment or the tiny wheels/tires but the rest of the vehicle was ok.
 
Pleasantly surprised at the way it drove. Except for its outward appearance, I wouldn't have a problem using it as a short distance commuter, or scoot around town vehicle. Actually kind of fun to "Zip" around locally, especially at the shopping malls and dealing with parking spaces. But there are Asian vehicles such as the Fit, Yaris, Scion, Versa, as well as offerings from South Korea in the same price range, that are already established.
 
It would need to be priced really low to get them on the road. Perception is that if we see a lot of something on the road, it must be good enough to consider buying. Perception is reality.
 
Ford seems to be on the right track with the new Focus and more expensive Fusion.
 
Kip
#5644 of 16701
Re: I'm Confused ROGELIOV [nvbanker] by circlew
Dec 01, 2008 (4:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: nvbanker (Nov 30, 2008 7:40 pm)

But I wouldn't take a chance to make a statement that I am committed personally to make sure my company becomes solvent. No pain, no gain, so to speak.
 
It's not like any of them is on life support personally. At least until the company makes money, they should sacrifice. Better than getting fired!
 
I agree that the C.E.O. must make a good salary but when the company does not perform for years? Come on now. You would fire him if it was YOUR company, no?
 
Regards,
OW
#5645 of 16701
Re: I'm Confused ROGELIOV [erikwi] by lemko
Dec 01, 2008 (6:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: erikwi (Nov 30, 2008 6:20 pm)

A paid-off house, car, etc? Wow! That would be fantastic! Other than those things, it takes very little money to support me. In a year's time I'd have massive savings. Just got to get rid of that other costly luxury that lives with me.
#5646 of 16701
Re: I'm Confused ROGELIOV [circlew] by lemko
Dec 01, 2008 (6:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: circlew (Dec 01, 2008 4:29 am)

Heck, I'd pull an Iacocca and work for $1 a year until the company once again became profitable. What these guys are paid for one year will easily last me the rest of my life and then some - unless I was super-stupid with my money. Didn't Waggoner get something like $22 million?
#5647 of 16701
Re: I'm Confused ROGELIOV [lemko] by gagrice
Dec 01, 2008 (6:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: lemko (Dec 01, 2008 6:21 am)

Didn't Waggoner get something like $22 million?
 
It was way more than he was worth, if you look at the net profit at GM. It could also be why he keeps signing onto UAW contracts that are not good for the bottom line. If Congress signs onto a bailout without getting rid of all the Job banks it will be criminal. A company paying those that retired after a long career is a good thing. Paying people to sit and not work is poor management. They also need to raise the age that you can start collecting retirement. Lastly take all control from the Union on modernization of the factories. They NEVER should have had a say in how a company operates. All goes back to worthless management.
#5648 of 16701
UAW agreement by imidazol97
Dec 01, 2008 (6:45 am)
Reply
Something was said somewhere that the UAW and GM had agreed to changes in pay and benefits that would allow a lower labor cost by the end of 2009?
 
Does someone actually know more about that agreement in a way they can explain if and how it remedies some of the perceptions I and others have?
#5649 of 16701
Re: the myth [lemko] by xrunner2
Dec 01, 2008 (8:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: lemko (Nov 28, 2008 8:36 pm)

Now, if my boss is a greedy idiot who will take advantage of me, disrespect me, and pay me poorly, I will take every chance I can to slack off and thwart his efforts at every turn.
 
Best bet is to quit asap while performing at 100 percent. In large companies, one can seek a transfer to another position/department with a new boss if pay is ok and overall company philosophy toward workers is good.
 
Are UAW workers treated poorly or disrespected or are they paid poorly?
 
Some years back, there was some kind of union contract that required that rail companies keep on an extra person in the locomotive to do nothing after the need for the associated position was eliminated by technology.

Messages Page 565 of 1671
1
...
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
...
1671
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement