You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
United Automobile Workers of America (UAW)

16738 messages, Last post on Dec 03, 2009 at 10:07 AM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
TBird-SC and the Turbo Coupe from the late 80's. A few years from 1989 through the 1990s I would rent those T-Birds from Hertz the 3 weeks I was off from my schedule in Alaska. I cruised all over the country in them. The small engine version would get 30 MPG out on the highway. I stopped using Hertz when they quit building that model. Three weeks in an ugly Taurus and I swore off on Ford and Hertz for good. I would rent the recent version of Mustang if they were not so high priced rentals. Ford built some horrible Thunderbirds from 1958 till about 1989. The new one in the early 21st century is nothing to write home about. None of which you can blame on the UAW, good or bad. |
|
People find this discussion expecting to read about the UAW. We have 100's of other discussions to discuss Future Vehicles or All Things Porsche or Classic Cars.
|
|
|
|
So does anyone have anything to say about the Saturn project. The Tennessee experiment in which labor(UAW) and management would partner up to beat out the Japanese car companies. They started out with a worthwhile goal, but the end result questions if eastern ideology can ever transition into the western culture.
|
|
|
|
Cadillac wanting to entice younger people (YUPPIES) tried the Catera as its bridge to this new market. Built in Germany by Opel, a GM division. High end Bosch parts, Recaro seats, Bose sound system, and basically bastardized as most euro cars are (sharing common parts from common brands). In any case this failed here in America to make any dent in the young urban professional euro market. Given that most German companies are union represented as is Opel in Germany. The car has been redone today CTS (Catera Touring Sedan) and can't keep up with demand in these trying times. Then its a UAW built car from Michigan. What went wrong with its initial offering? It should also be noted that the Catera is now the Opel Omega and a big hit in Europe.
|
|
|
Replying to: dallasdude1 (Nov 22, 2008 9:26 am) The original Catera handled well but was underpowered relative to its weight (it was something of a porker, as I recall), suffered from bland styling & was sold only with an automatic. I was surprised at the time (late 90s) that Cadillac's 1st shot at this market missed so badly. You refer to this market segment as new, but yuppies had been identified as a separate market way back in the mid 80s - more than 10 years earlier. By the late 80s, jokes about "yuppies in their BMWs" were standard comic fare. Given that Cadillac was so many years late to this party, you'd think that their entry would have shown a much clearer understanding of what yuppies wanted in their cars. Understand that I'm not a reflexive Cadillac basher. The 1st-gen (2003-07) CTS was vastly better than the Catera, & the current CTS is easily the best Cadillac in 50 years, & one that I'll seriously consider as a replacement for my BMW. It's just too bad, though, that it takes GM so long to bring genuinely compelling cars to market. IMO, that's the biggest single reason why the company is in trouble today. |
|
|
|
|
Back when the UAW/unions were strong, CEO's weren't compensated what they are today. I recall, if memory serves me right, that the GM CEO was making $400,000 a year. That was more than the president was making. As PATCO and other unions were weakened, CEO/board of director pay has gotten out of hand. I have no problem with the risk taker and or someone with special talents being compensated well. The entrepreneur making absurd sums is just fine. However, to pay these folks who aren't even our brightest for mismanaging is just not right. Most of this countries finest and brightest go into engineering, science, medicine, and other fields which create innovation. Higher education weeds out the best and brightest. Many college freshmen change majors when they can't overcome a class or classes which are required for the sciences. I would venture to guess the less than 10% have the ability to complete the science/engineering/medical requirements. I'm also aware that all these engineers coming out of India are not even close to the product American universities and colleges produce. Business schools are fine and dandy. If there is anything hard in their discipline, it might be the option of sitting in on the CPA exam. Most opt for the many other specialties. So why on earth would we allow these folks who took the low road in getting a degree to operate a large corporation? Economic axioms of banks/insurance concerns being a sure thing have to be rewritten as these fools have proven us wrong. The chore of removing postulates from text books is at hand. This talent pool is not exactly the best and brightest of what higher education has to offer. Village idiots put in charge of corporations is just not wise. The union made me do it, the sun was in my eyes, I ate paint chips, I wasn't breast fed/nursed or other lame excuses should not be accepted. Its been my experience that if I put my mind to anything, I can get it done. Trained in the scientific disciplines, but interested in other fields has given me the ability to invest well and make money is a safe manner in the financial markets. Rewarded for both risk and talents/abilities has more than rewarded me with, something I consider rather simplistic, a higher standard of living. In fact I made, what I consider reasonable, second income advising others up until this last year. This leaves me wondering if those CEO's will be able to manage their compensation/wealth, because of the very fact that they did a poor job managing the corporations they operated. If they do it the same manner, they might well be in front or behind you in the unemployment line.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
United Automobile Workers of America (UAW)
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle


Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats