You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
United Automobile Workers of America (UAW)

16726 messages, Last post on Dec 02, 2009 at 10:01 AM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
|
|---|---|
|
all I'm saying is a prudent UAW worker should be thinking about re-training. Now. Maybe start taking some action toward re-training. Your "facts" don't hide the fact that you avoid: not enough people want GM, Ford and Chrysler products. Should the U.S. be involved in throwing hard-earned tax monies away? Poor planning and management has equalled big-time trouble and throwing a very expensive Band-Aid at this while a lot of peope in all trades and industries are also losing their jobs isn't making good common sense to me.
|
|
|
Replying to: rockylee (Nov 17, 2008 3:40 pm) Not sure what you mean by modest. I can tell you after 37 years in the Teamsters my retirement is not even close to the guys in the IBEW or Operating Engineers. Plus I did not get any health care or dental. That would have equaled about $950 per month. So if your dad gets Health care he is ahead of me there. Then when you take into consideration the fact that I was remote the last 25 years that should be worth something. I would imagine your dad was home most nights. Where I was in a 10 X10 cubicle for half the nights of those 25 years. Again anyone wanting to go remote there are plenty of jobs for those with skills. One of my friends retired at 57 or 6 years younger than I did with twice the monthly pension I get. He was a mechanic on the pipeline and put in a lot of 12 week shifts 12-16 hours per day. Is your dad old enough to retire? If not he should be looking for a job to supplement his pension until SS kicks in.
|
|
|
Replying to: iluvmysephia1 (Nov 17, 2008 6:23 pm) Computers? Maybe if he wants to work in Bangladore. Health Care? Good call, but if everybody is unemployed, underemployed, or uninsured, how is he going to get paid? Trades? All the tradesmen are having a tough time due to the housing crunch. Heck, even the illegal immigrants who did such work are going back over the border. Law Enforcement and Prisons would be a good choice, but if the tax base is decimated, who's going to pay for all those police and correctional officers?
|
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Nov 17, 2008 6:38 pm) I assume most of ya'll seen the video I posted. If the Big 3 fail this country is done !!! What's good for Big 3 is good for America. If we can give a bunch of money to sleazy Wallstreet executives to spend on spa resorts or on a worthless war in Iraq, that had nothing to do with 9/11 we can sure in the hell bailout the Big 3. It's a loan and once we fix trade and currency manipulation GM, like many struggling domestic manufacturers will be better off. I would love nothing better than to not only see General Motors, build the future green vehicles but also get involved in building other forms of transportation i.e. bullet trains, jet airplanes, etc..... If the tax payers want to guarantee GM, success give them contracts to build some of these green technologies here in the U.S. -Rocky
|
|
|
Replying to: imidazol97 (Nov 17, 2008 5:36 pm) -Rocky |
|
|
Replying to: cooterbfd (Nov 17, 2008 5:50 pm) Correct and it's with Fidelity !!! -Rocky |
|
|
Replying to: iluvmysephia1 (Nov 17, 2008 6:23 pm) Well that's not true either because GM, still sells by quite a large margin more automobiles than Toyota, here in the U.S. last time I checked !!! Should the U.S. be involved in throwing hard-earned tax monies away? Invest $25 billion now or lose $160 Billion in 3 years thus the choice is yours !!! Poor planning and management has equalled big-time trouble and throwing a very expensive Band-Aid at this while a lot of peope in all trades and industries are also losing their jobs isn't making good common sense to me. I would throw more than $25 billion at the problem. I would give the Big 3 a $100 Billion Dollars and with that money with government oversight I would award them contracts to build locomotives, military equipment, etc..... -Rocky |
|
|
Replying to: lemko (Nov 17, 2008 7:20 pm) -Rocky |
|
|
Replying to: imidazol97 (Nov 17, 2008 5:36 pm) |
|
|
Seems the Democrats do not want to use the money allocated in the Energy bill to bail out the Big 3. Bush has said he did not want to spend all the money in the bailout. He will leave over half for Obama to decide. Obama makes the decision which voters he will pay back. GM folding will be forgotten in a year. Except for the suckers with their cars that were supposed to be covered by warranty. NO ONE IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD BUY A GM VEHICLE NOW. Ford will probably come out stronger as will Toyota and the other transplants. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
United Automobile Workers of America (UAW)
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle


Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats