Sign In Join 



United Automobile Workers of America (UAW)

16705 messages,  Last post on Nov 25, 2009 at 6:56 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News


Messages Page 1557 of 1671
1
...
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1560
...
1671
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#15556 of 16705
Re: REality is hitting home where it counts... [cooterbfd] by wesleyg
Jun 25, 2009 (3:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: cooterbfd (Jun 24, 2009 1:17 pm)

Your computations are correct. What got me worked up is the thought that I've read lately on many news forums that the taxpayers are sick of paying for government employees rich pensions while they themselves have none.
 
For most politicians, I'll bet thats true, but for run of the mill grunt government retirees, theres no golden benefits. I shouldnt have spouted off about the UAW, since I dont know the facts.
#15557 of 16705
Re: REality is hitting home where it counts... [imidazol97] by wesleyg
Jun 25, 2009 (4:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: imidazol97 (Jun 24, 2009 7:39 am)

As I recall, you also live in Ohio. Your neighbor, if its any consolation, could not collect anything on SS since he is a member of one the five State retirement systems. I'd probably still trade pensions with him, sounds like he gets paid a bundle.
#15558 of 16705
Re: REality is hitting home where it counts... [wesleyg] by imidazol97
Jun 25, 2009 (4:23 am)
Reply

Replying to: wesleyg (Jun 25, 2009 4:06 am)

The person in my post was someone in Illinois because I quoted someone else.
 
SS penalizes those who worked two jobs because they must be double-dipping in the retirements. How SS misses most abuse of the systems but it made legislators feel better two decades ago to cut back SS payouts if someone had another retirement--cut, not eliminated if I understand correctly.
 
But UAW people collect both and I assume they are not penalized by having a high payout from UAW in retirement when it's added to the SS along with the full healthcare and everything care they used to enjoy.
#15559 of 16705
Re: REality is hitting home where it counts... [imidazol97] by dieselone
Jun 25, 2009 (5:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: imidazol97 (Jun 24, 2009 7:35 am)

They also pay into their retirement plan and I have little idea of how Illinois' is set up for professional educators. I assume they pay into SS and also pay into a teachers' retirement system plan and the school district pays into the same retirement plan on their behalf.
 
And the school system is supported by property taxes and is partially why a $400k house in Illinois can have $10k/yr in property taxes depending on the area. My house probably lost $50k in value last year, yet my property tax assessment still went up almost $1k/yr. Sales taxes went up 1% and now the state wants to increase income tax from 3% to 5%. It's getting a bit excessive IMO.
#15560 of 16705
Re: REality is hitting home where it counts... [imidazol97] by gagrice
Jun 25, 2009 (5:18 am)
Reply

Replying to: imidazol97 (Jun 25, 2009 4:23 am)

But UAW people collect both and I assume they are not penalized by having a high payout from UAW in retirement when it's added to the SS along with the full healthcare and everything care they used to enjoy.
 
Actually I believe the GM Pension fund does take back some of the retirement when a retiree takes SS. The reason being, that GM paid half of the SS premium during the employment. It is a negotiated part of the retirement. The real problem was and is, that GM agreed to an open ended health care plan for the life of the retiree and spouse. When they signed the contract it may have cost GM $200 per month for the gold plated health care plan. Now it is probably more like $800 per month or even more. Our Teamster plan was barely copper plated and costing our company $1200 per month. Even at $1200 per month our plan is in financial difficulty because the cost of services are escalating.
#15561 of 16705
Re: REality is hitting home where it counts... [michaell] by srs_49
Jun 25, 2009 (5:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: michaell (Jun 24, 2009 9:29 am)

My wife works for a school district here in Colorado, and they base your pension off of the three highest earning years. I think it's 50% of that amount after 20 years, then an additional 2% for each year afterwards, up to a maximum of something like 75-80%.
 
It's something like that here in Maryland also. The problem with it, from a funding standpoint, is that it's based on the average of your highest 3 years salary. As you said, up to 80% of that highest average, which a pretty darn good deal no matter how you slice it. Way over what most workers in private industry can expect.
 
Federal workers in the old system had it just as good. I'll repeat my story again about our friend who retired from the feds after 40 years. After a couple of years of COLA's, he's bringing home more now in retirement than he made while he was working. Courtesy of the US taxpayers.
#15562 of 16705
Re: REality is hitting home where it counts... [gagrice] by dieselone
Jun 25, 2009 (5:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jun 25, 2009 5:18 am)

When they signed the contract it may have cost GM $200 per month for the gold plated health care plan. Now it is probably more like $800 per month or even more. Our Teamster plan was barely copper plated and costing our company $1200 per month. Even at $1200 per month our plan is in financial difficulty because the cost of services are escalating.
 
No doubt increasing healthcare costs are creating real problems. My wife's employer just changed the formula for healthcare in retirement and she missed by being two years to young. Oh well, at least we have another 25+ years to plan for it.
#15563 of 16705
Re: REality is hitting home where it counts... [lokki] by srs_49
Jun 25, 2009 (5:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: lokki (Jun 24, 2009 11:21 am)

And my company changed to cash balance plan 5 years ago for similar reasons. Though, I really think it was to limit their pension liability.
 
The way they transitioned to the cash balance plan really hit older workers hard. In my case, at 65 I will be bringing home around $400/month less under the new plan than I would have under the old defined benefit plan. This is because there's an accrued interest that's part of the cash balance plan, and, for older workers (those over, say, age 55), there's just not enough time for the compounding effects of the interest to offset the loss from the defined benefit plan, had it continued.
#15564 of 16705
Re: REality is hitting home where it counts... [andre1969] by srs_49
Jun 25, 2009 (5:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Jun 24, 2009 11:26 am)

Buy a burger
#15565 of 16705
Re: REality is hitting home where it counts... [cooterbfd] by srs_49
Jun 25, 2009 (5:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: cooterbfd (Jun 24, 2009 2:37 pm)

Yes, that's the way I would interpret that also.

Messages Page 1557 of 1671
1
...
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1560
...
1671
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement