Sign In Join 



2008 Minivans - READ ONLY

1261 messages,  Last post on Feb 27, 2008 at 7:47 AM

You are in the Vans & Minivans Forum. Your Host is Karens

What is this discussion about? Toyota Sienna, Honda Odyssey, Chrysler Town and Country, Dodge Caravan, Hyundai Entourage, Mazda MAZDA5, Kia Sedona, Car Comparisons, Car Buying, Van


Messages Page 15 of 127
1
...
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
...
127
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#140 of 1261
quality by bobw3
Sep 04, 2007 (8:14 am)
I wonder why then does the Odyssey & Sienna consistently beat the T&C in just about every car magazine, article, or quality survey out there? It's good that some folks have good long-term luck with their Chrysler product, but if that were the case with a majority of buyers, then you'd think that the T&C quality ratings would exceed those of the Odyssey & Sienna for the past decade.
 
But it's true that if you can't find an Odyssey or Sienna in your price range with the options you want, then the T&C may be what you want to get.
 
And please don't respond with any conspiracy theories.
#141 of 1261
Depreciation by ateixeira
Sep 04, 2007 (9:58 am)
Lots to talk about here.
 
I agree that numbers stated at a % of the MSRP are pretty much useless, unless you paid MSRP.
 
So steep discounts and 0% financing can help offset some (not all) of the steeper depreciation. In another thread I offered up some no-haggle pricing, new vs. used, same dealerships, and Honda and Toyota still had the edge, even factoring in the steep discounts.
 
Still, there is the opportunity cost to figure. Depends on what you would do the money.
 
Also, the 2008 Dodges may do better, now that they're new and improved.
 
Note the lifetime powertrain warranty will not help resale, as it is *not* transferable. That might actually erode residuals because it encourages people to buy instead of used.
 
Edmunds 0-60 for that Ody is unusually slow, their last one was quicker. The champ in acceleration will still be the Sienna, though, with 266hp. Edmunds has not tested one with the new 3.5l engine, so it's hard to understand why they excluded it from this test.
 
I'll check out a Dodge when I get a chance, though I bought my van back in May so it's too late for me this time around.
#142 of 1261
Re: quality [bobw3] by marine2
Sep 04, 2007 (8:50 pm)

Replying to: bobw3 (Sep 04, 2007 8:14 am)

I think it's because for years Honda and Toyota made nice looking and fairly reliable minivans and cars that had the things Americans wanted on their vehicles. But while they still do. I think Chrysler has more than caught up. Now Honda and Toyota might still have some small advantages over the new 2008 Dodge/Chrysler minivans, I think Chrysler has them beat in offering the American consummer anything he could want in a minivan, no matter what your looking for, except seating for eight. I think Chrysler's minivan not only measures up, they have a lot more than the competition.
 
Besides having all the safety features Honda has, it has a lot they don't. Things like power saver, that turns off your lights after about 20 min. in case you left them on. Only van with self leveling shocks, two DVD's, that can play two different movies at the same time, or video on one and games on the other. It can also be fed up to the front dash monitor, when the van is stopped. Television, A 20 gig hard drive for storing music or pictures. Only van to offer a intergrated child boster seat. A 506 watt 7.1 surround system, with a minivan first, subwoofer. Only van to offer a six speed transmission. A intergrated drop down survellance mirror to see what the kids are doing in the back. Only van to offer stow-n-go or Swivel And Go seats and table. Only van to offer automatic rear seat, with one touch stowing. You can get a firmer ride with the Dodge, or a softer ride in the Chrysler. That doesn't even include all the other stuff it has. There is a model for what every family needs or wants. Plus only company to offer a life time warranty on engine and drive train. I think it more than measures up.
#143 of 1261
Re: quality [marine2] by rv65
Sep 04, 2007 (11:49 pm)

Replying to: marine2 (Sep 04, 2007 8:50 pm)

Odyssey has a subwoofer in the touring.
#144 of 1261
Re: quality [marine2] by davethewave1
Sep 05, 2007 (4:31 am)

Replying to: marine2 (Sep 04, 2007 8:50 pm)

As already mentioned Ody has the sub. Honda and Toyota have the integrated conversation mirror. Toyota has the power rear fold down seat.
 
I've had a hard time convincing my wife to take a look at the new T&C. I might have to go by my self and check it out, we are very close to buying.
#145 of 1261
Re: quality [davethewave1] by marine2
Sep 05, 2007 (5:47 am)

Replying to: davethewave1 (Sep 05, 2007 4:31 am)

If your going to buy one, you'd be crazy not to check them all out. I think you'll find out, Chrysler vans have a heck of a lot to offer minivan buyers. That halo lighting is really cool looking at night. The only real advantage Honda and Toyota now have on Chrysler is resale value. That is mostly because there are so many more Chrysler minivans sold and their bland interior. If your planning on keeping your van more than 2-3 years, resale value won't make much difference. Although with their new interior, I don't think that will be as much a factor as it was on the old ones. People are not going to look inside and automatically disregard this minivan because of it's bland gray interior, as many did on the older vans. As a matter of fact,, I hear Chrysler not only has the front seats heated, but also the middle seats.
#146 of 1261
Re: quality [marine2] by ateixeira
Sep 05, 2007 (8:25 am)

Replying to: marine2 (Sep 04, 2007 8:50 pm)

You make several good points, but I made a similar point in the Sedona/Entourage threads and I'll make it again here.
 
You're focusing on the toppings. More of them, specifically.
 
Honda and Toyota sell better ice cream.
 
Dodge offers jimmies, syrup, whipped cream, jelly beans, gummy bears, granola, and all sort of chopped up candy bars on top of their vanilla ice cream. That's fine if you like toppings.
 
But then they still use pushrod engines and hard plastics straight from the low-buck Caliber on the dash. They get the options right but miss on some of the basics.
 
In the ice cream analogy, they use generic ice cream underneath all those toppings.
 
Honda and Toyota use Breyer's vanilla.
 
The lesson to be learned here? I'm hungry for lunch!
 
Any how, $39,305 and it's still a pushrod engine.
#147 of 1261
Re: quality [ateixeira] by davethewave1
Sep 05, 2007 (9:41 am)

Replying to: ateixeira (Sep 05, 2007 8:25 am)

Nice
#148 of 1261
Re: quality [ateixeira] by dennisctc
Sep 05, 2007 (9:48 am)

Replying to: ateixeira (Sep 05, 2007 8:25 am)

Talk to automotive engineers, and there are many benefits to a pushrod engine besides lower mfg cost, they also provide more torque at lower RPMs, similar MPG and easier to repair. Just look at the "pushrod" Corvette and Z06 engines, hardly Cosco bucket icecream!
#149 of 1261
Re: quality [ateixeira] by bobw3
Sep 05, 2007 (9:51 am)

Replying to: ateixeira (Sep 05, 2007 8:25 am)

I agree with you. I'm more interested in the engine, handling, proven quality, reliability, etc than with a lot of toppings!

Messages Page 15 of 127
1
...
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
...
127
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement