Sign In Join 



2008 Minivans - READ ONLY

1261 messages,  Last post on Feb 27, 2008 at 7:47 AM

You are in the Vans & Minivans Forum. Your Host is Karens

What is this discussion about? Toyota Sienna, Honda Odyssey, Chrysler Town and Country, Dodge Caravan, Hyundai Entourage, Mazda MAZDA5, Kia Sedona, Car Comparisons, Car Buying, Van


Messages Page 111 of 127
1
...
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
...
127
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1098 of 1261
Re: quality vs reliability [bobw3] by bobber1
Feb 06, 2008 (7:20 pm)

Replying to: bobw3 (Feb 06, 2008 4:03 pm)

You have to be kidding. You'd rather have your vehicle in the shop getting worked on twice a year compared to one?
 
I say skip both the VW and Chrysler and buy a Toyota or Honda. You'll get a more reliable vehicle with the better "feeling" switches and finish you seem to like
#1099 of 1261
Re: quality vs reliability [bobber1] by bobw3
Feb 07, 2008 (7:26 am)

Replying to: bobber1 (Feb 06, 2008 7:20 pm)

But neither the Sienna nor Odyssey may offer all of the features you want. Sometimes I think people place too much emphasis on reliability. In general Honda & Toyota are more reliable (however their models lately haven't been too reliable according to CR), but reliability is only ONE factor to look at when buying a car. I know die-hard Volvo owners who love their car even if they need to bring it into "their mechanic" at least 2-3 times/year for something. But that doesn't bother them in the least. Volvos are as solid as a little tank driving around and that's more important to them then reliablity statistics.
 
I'm not saying everyone thinks that way, but to me the Chrysler minivans have more features than the Odyssey/Sienna, such as underfoot storage coolers, swivel seats w/table, individual DVD screens, lifetime powertrain warranty, and so for families with kids who take a lot of road trips, these things may be more valuable than a statistic that indicates that the Odyssey or Sienna is more reliable.
 
Could be the same when the VW comes out, especially for folks who just want to drive something different than their neighbor's Odyssey/Sienna
#1100 of 1261
Re: quality vs reliability [bobw3] by ateixeira
Feb 07, 2008 (10:29 am)

Replying to: bobw3 (Feb 07, 2008 7:26 am)

In general Honda & Toyota are more reliable (however their models lately haven't been too reliable according to CR),
 
Note that the Sienna is not among the models with recent problems.
 
In the context of this thread, i.e. the Sienna being their only minivan, CR has rated Toyota vans as reliable all along, consistently, and still do.
 
The fact that 6 speed transmission and Tundra V8 are problematic have had no effect whatsoever on the Sienna, of course, since it never got those.
 
Actually, that CR rated some other Toyotas poorly sort of contradicts the claims of bias that some people make.
 
Any how, just wanted to point that out. Sienna is still CR's most reliable van, has been for years now.
#1101 of 1261
Re: quality vs reliability [bobw3] by ateixeira
Feb 07, 2008 (10:33 am)

Replying to: bobw3 (Feb 07, 2008 7:26 am)

reliability is only ONE factor to look at when buying a car
 
Now to address the 2nd half of your sentence.
 
Indeed, reliability is one factor, but the Sienna still excels in many other ways:
 
* most HP, quickest acceleration
* most fuel efficient (despite being quickest, wow!)
* only AWD option
* only true 8 seater
* most cases of beer in the cargo area in any position!
 
That last one won me over.
 
I didn't choose the Sienna because of its reliability scores. But I'll take that, too.
#1102 of 1261
Re: quality vs reliability [ateixeira] by bobw3
Feb 07, 2008 (2:59 pm)

Replying to: ateixeira (Feb 07, 2008 10:33 am)

It's good that the Sienna had the features you wanted. But if you had a car full of kids, then some of the features in the new Town & Country may be more usefull than AWD or more HP.
#1103 of 1261
Re:better feeling switches? [bobber1] by hansienna
Feb 07, 2008 (3:23 pm)

Replying to: bobber1 (Feb 06, 2008 7:20 pm)

I liked the controls and switches of my 2002 T&C LX MUCH more than the "one knob does everything" of my 2006 Sienna LE but I do agree that Chrysler minivans now have too much cheap looking and cheap feeling plastic in the interior.
 
The Sienna LE interior is much more attractive than the T&C LX or T&C Touring.
#1104 of 1261
Re:better feeling switches? [hansienna] by hause7
Feb 07, 2008 (4:47 pm)

Replying to: hansienna (Feb 07, 2008 3:23 pm)

That i can agree on with you Hanssienna...the new Town&country and caravan has the ugliest/cheapest interior out of all the minivans. The Sienna Le we looked at was actually quite nice for the price. We got an offer of $23,242 for a Black Le with Extra value package 2, 16" alloys, and Wiper de-icer/daytime lights. We are very tempted to take the deal. we would miss our nice Limited touches but oh well.
#1105 of 1261
Re: quality vs reliability [bobw3] by ateixeira
Feb 08, 2008 (10:57 am)

Replying to: bobw3 (Feb 07, 2008 2:59 pm)

some of the features in the new Town & Country may be more usefull
 
Well, I bought my van in May, before the new models were even available for sale.
 
I have since checked out the Town & Country at the DC Auto Show, and some of the interior materials disappointed me. The "leather" seats look like vinyl, and the material is shiny, plus the plastics aren't up to par, IMHO.
 
The swiveling seats are cool, but they're still too low to the ground and when they face the rear there isn't enough leg room for either row. They should move the 3rd row back - a lot. Like a whole foot back.
 
I like the idea of the 2 DVD screens, but we got a 12" aftermarket screen so those screens now seem tiny to us.
 
The MyGig is cool, but the Sienna is WMA/MP3 capable, so 6 CDs fit more songs than I have in my song library. No gain for me.
 
That plus we already have a Garmin GPS, which works fine. Just upgraded to a 200 widescreen for $199. Can't beat that for value.
 
I don't think for the $25 grand that I spent I'd get many of the features you have in mind. Even adding in the huge DVD screen and my GPS we spent just a hair over $26k.
#1106 of 1261
CR is biased by lavrishevo
Feb 15, 2008 (7:14 pm)
Toyota does make a great van but they are not without problems. Consider the huge issue with door welds failing just after warranty. Honda also has very troubling transmissions problems. Just look at the Honda thread and see for yourself. I've come to the conclusion that CR is more biased then I previously thought. I own a Kia Sedona, an 06 and CR recently dropped their "recommended" rating for the Sedona based off of what I do not know. The problems with Kia's new design year have been very minor but look at some of Honda's major tranny design flaws and Toyota's weld's failing CR does not mention this at all and still recommended them like no tomorrow. CR is biased.
#1107 of 1261
Re: CR is biased [lavrishevo] by dennisctc
Feb 15, 2008 (7:39 pm)

Replying to: lavrishevo (Feb 15, 2008 7:14 pm)

I've come to the conclusion that CR is more biased then I previously thought
 
No, REALLY???? Next you'll be saying the way they calculate resale value is flawed i.e...using MSRP not actual sale price, and not factoring in larger rebates on vehicles! Or maybe they lay out their magazine in a biased fashion i.e...mostly pics of imports on the cover and lead of articles!!! I've never heard of such slander!!

Messages Page 111 of 127
1
...
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
...
127
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement