Sign In Join 



2008 Minivans - READ ONLY

1261 messages,  Last post on Feb 27, 2008 at 7:47 AM

You are in the Vans & Minivans Forum. Your Host is Karens

What is this discussion about? Toyota Sienna, Honda Odyssey, Chrysler Town and Country, Dodge Caravan, Hyundai Entourage, Mazda MAZDA5, Kia Sedona, Car Comparisons, Car Buying, Van


Messages Page 111 of 127
1
...
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
...
127
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1092 of 1261
Re: Which one? [artgpo] by dennisctc
Feb 06, 2008 (2:49 pm)

Replying to: artgpo (Feb 06, 2008 2:31 pm)

legitimate complaints from other dissatisfied owners? Your way or the highway?
 
Ohhh there's plenty of "legitimate complaints" to go around here....horror tales from Toyota, Honda and Chrysler owners. If one went by the comments on this board "Which One" would be thinking of just taking mass transit. Seeing that "Which One" hadn't driven other makes and just had a misperception, they owe it to themselves to SHOP, COMPARE and make an INFORMED decision. That would be my way not the highway.
 
I see plenty of people on here badmouthing a make because of a bad experience and it will forever cloud their thinking, they'll take it to their graves, whining and moaning... I've owned awesome domestics and crappy imports, but I looked at all minivans a few years back before deciding on my totally trouble free Grand Caravan.
#1093 of 1261
Re: Which one? [dennisctc] by hansienna
Feb 06, 2008 (3:28 pm)

Replying to: dennisctc (Feb 06, 2008 2:55 am)

The "perception" of poor reliability of Chrysler minivans is due to trash talk by "NOT Recommended for purchase" Consumer Reports and their un-scientific predicted reliability crap.
 
All Chrysler minivan owners but one ( including Dodge and Plymouth minivans) are completely satisfied. That person got an ABUSED, used Plymouth Voyager.
 
I loved my 2002 Chrysler T&C LX that our daughter is now driving.
#1094 of 1261
Re: Which one? [dennisctc] by artgpo
Feb 06, 2008 (3:34 pm)

Replying to: dennisctc (Feb 06, 2008 2:49 pm)

Your opinion is no more important than someone with a bad experience who would never buy that particular brand again. It seems to me that certain judgments are made by certain people here about the credibility of the poster. I have owned at least six different brands of minivans including two from GM, one each from Ford and Chrysler plus a VW, Nissan and a Honda yet when I post a negative comment I am shot down usually with you in the vanguard.
#1095 of 1261
Re: Which one? [artgpo] by dennisctc
Feb 06, 2008 (3:48 pm)

Replying to: artgpo (Feb 06, 2008 3:34 pm)

when I post a negative comment I am shot down usually with you in the vanguard.
 
Jeez, how did I shoot you down? Are you taking my "whining and moaning" personally - if you are, that's your problem, not mine. I don't let my experiences color every future buying decision from here to enternity.....that's the difference between my opinion and someone with a bad experience who harps on it constantly. If for some reason you feel i'm referring specifically to you - get over it!!!
#1096 of 1261
Gentlemen? by KarenS HOST
Feb 06, 2008 (3:58 pm)
It's about minivans, not each other. Please refrain from making it personal.
#1097 of 1261
quality vs reliability by bobw3
Feb 06, 2008 (4:03 pm)
The quality I'm talking about where VW excels is internal controls, switches, materials, etc, and this is where Chrysler and their hard plastics fail. Again, some people would rather drive a vehicle that feels of greater interior quality (and better driving dynamics), then drive a vehicle with an interior that looks and feels cheap and drives like a school bus (even if it is quiet). So maybe they have to take it in to the shop twice a year for repairs as compared to a Chrysler that you only have to take in once a year for repairs, but they're more satisfied with their vehicle the other 363 days of the year.
#1098 of 1261
Re: quality vs reliability [bobw3] by bobber1
Feb 06, 2008 (7:20 pm)

Replying to: bobw3 (Feb 06, 2008 4:03 pm)

You have to be kidding. You'd rather have your vehicle in the shop getting worked on twice a year compared to one?
 
I say skip both the VW and Chrysler and buy a Toyota or Honda. You'll get a more reliable vehicle with the better "feeling" switches and finish you seem to like
#1099 of 1261
Re: quality vs reliability [bobber1] by bobw3
Feb 07, 2008 (7:26 am)

Replying to: bobber1 (Feb 06, 2008 7:20 pm)

But neither the Sienna nor Odyssey may offer all of the features you want. Sometimes I think people place too much emphasis on reliability. In general Honda & Toyota are more reliable (however their models lately haven't been too reliable according to CR), but reliability is only ONE factor to look at when buying a car. I know die-hard Volvo owners who love their car even if they need to bring it into "their mechanic" at least 2-3 times/year for something. But that doesn't bother them in the least. Volvos are as solid as a little tank driving around and that's more important to them then reliablity statistics.
 
I'm not saying everyone thinks that way, but to me the Chrysler minivans have more features than the Odyssey/Sienna, such as underfoot storage coolers, swivel seats w/table, individual DVD screens, lifetime powertrain warranty, and so for families with kids who take a lot of road trips, these things may be more valuable than a statistic that indicates that the Odyssey or Sienna is more reliable.
 
Could be the same when the VW comes out, especially for folks who just want to drive something different than their neighbor's Odyssey/Sienna
#1100 of 1261
Re: quality vs reliability [bobw3] by ateixeira
Feb 07, 2008 (10:29 am)

Replying to: bobw3 (Feb 07, 2008 7:26 am)

In general Honda & Toyota are more reliable (however their models lately haven't been too reliable according to CR),
 
Note that the Sienna is not among the models with recent problems.
 
In the context of this thread, i.e. the Sienna being their only minivan, CR has rated Toyota vans as reliable all along, consistently, and still do.
 
The fact that 6 speed transmission and Tundra V8 are problematic have had no effect whatsoever on the Sienna, of course, since it never got those.
 
Actually, that CR rated some other Toyotas poorly sort of contradicts the claims of bias that some people make.
 
Any how, just wanted to point that out. Sienna is still CR's most reliable van, has been for years now.
#1101 of 1261
Re: quality vs reliability [bobw3] by ateixeira
Feb 07, 2008 (10:33 am)

Replying to: bobw3 (Feb 07, 2008 7:26 am)

reliability is only ONE factor to look at when buying a car
 
Now to address the 2nd half of your sentence.
 
Indeed, reliability is one factor, but the Sienna still excels in many other ways:
 
* most HP, quickest acceleration
* most fuel efficient (despite being quickest, wow!)
* only AWD option
* only true 8 seater
* most cases of beer in the cargo area in any position!
 
That last one won me over.
 
I didn't choose the Sienna because of its reliability scores. But I'll take that, too.

Messages Page 111 of 127
1
...
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
...
127
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement