Article Comments - 2008 F-450 Super Duty Full Test

146 messages, Last post on Oct 26, 2009 at 7:20 AM

You are in the Ford F-Series Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Ford F-450 Super Duty, Truck

Article comments for Full Test: 2008 Ford F-450 Super Duty - For those hauling heavy loads — whether it's an extended horse trailer, a part-time home for recreation in remote areas or even a pair of hobby cars — your steed has arrived. (more)

Outline

Messages Page 3 of 15: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; ...; 15; Prev; Next; Last

#17 of 146 08 Not so great!~ by 08mistake Jul 20, 2007 (5:26 pm)
">link title
#18 of 146 08 Not so great!~ by 08mistake Jul 20, 2007 (5:43 pm)
Wish I could attach my Dino testing report for my truck. Ford claims this truck has 350 hp and 650 ft-lbs of torque. Well this is not the case with my truck the best it could do was 155 hp 3150RPM and 271 ft-lbs torque. If this cannot be fixed, i think this is pretty good grounds for false representation of the vehicle. Replies to this message: losman54 (Aug 16, 2007 6:30 pm)
#19 of 146 Re: My new f-450 [floorz] by 08mistake Jul 20, 2007 (6:02 pm)
Replying to: floorz (May 07, 2007 9:11 am) This truck does suck fuel....not to mention no power power to pull a 32ft fifth wheel. No help from the Ford dealer or Ford Engineers as of yet! I take it back in on Monday....will be interesting to see what they come up with. How ever they do know that I will be taking it back to the dino to see what improvement they have or haven't made on Hp and torque. Fuel is about 9.9mpg at best!
#20 of 146 Re: Gas Mileage - 2008 Super Duty [luken] by 08mistake Jul 26, 2007 (5:18 pm)
Replying to: luken (May 14, 2007 10:35 am) Any improvement with fuel economy? Still working on the issues with our truck. It has been at the dealership all week. I will keep you posted as to any improvements when it comes back. Replies to this message: floorz (Jul 27, 2007 6:27 am) charlie890 (Oct 25, 2008 7:45 am) seamule (Apr 23, 2008 6:11 pm)
#21 of 146 Re: Gas Mileage - 2008 Super Duty [08mistake] by floorz Jul 27, 2007 (6:27 am)
Replying to: 08mistake (Jul 26, 2007 5:18 pm) I have about 8000mi on my f450 and have noticed only a slight increase in fuel economey. On a recent trip keeping speeds under 75mph the best I could do was about 9mpg. around town I get about 9.9. Towing my boat still gets about 5 to 6mpg. I still love this truck but come on ford, what's up with this mileage? I would love to be able to put a chip on it to increase mileage but we know ford's stance on that one. Keep us posted on what your dealer comes up with. Replies to this message: charlie890 (Oct 25, 2008 7:45 am)
#22 of 146 What Rear end do you have? the 4.88 LS? by mschmal Jul 29, 2007 (6:18 am)
Check your window sticker. Most of the F-450s are shipping with the 4.88 LS rear end as it is standard. This is a commercial truck ratio and offers towing power beyond any other factory pickup's wildest dreams. AND it sacrafices fuel econ to get it. If you do have a 4.88, you might want to get a price on swapping in a 4.10. Mark. Replies to this message: floorz (Jul 30, 2007 4:32 am)
#23 of 146 Re: What Rear end do you have? the 4.88 LS? [mschmal] by floorz Jul 30, 2007 (4:32 am)
Replying to: mschmal (Jul 29, 2007 6:18 am) Mark, I have the 4.88. Before I spent money on a new rear end I would want to see some true mileage figures with the 4.1 axle. Do you know of any? As I stated in an earlier post, I tow a 14,000lb boat. The 4.88 axle is the only way to get the tow package on this truck, brakes etc. jb
#24 of 146 Thoughts on towing. by mschmal Jul 30, 2007 (10:40 am)
If you are considering an F-450 with available 5th wheel towing of 24,000 pounds and a GCWR of 33,000 pounds!!! You need to understand that you buying a COMMERCIAL vehicle. This is a truck for peeps who cannot meet their towing needs with a lesser truck. An F-350 Diesel DRW 4x4 Crew Cab offers 17,700 pounds of Fifth wheel towing with the TowBoss 4.3 LS rear and 15,200 pounds of fifth wheel towing with the 4.1 rear. Granted it is recommended that you do not exceed 85% of a truck's GCWR on a regular basis; however, if you purchased an F-450 to tow 14,000 pounds of boat a couple of times per year then I can't help but wonder if you would think it a good idea to take a bazooka rabbit hunting. Replies to this message: floorz (Jul 30, 2007 2:49 pm)
#25 of 146 Re: Thoughts on towing. [mschmal] by floorz Jul 30, 2007 (2:49 pm)
Replying to: mschmal (Jul 30, 2007 10:40 am) Just out of curosity, how did you come to the conclusion that I only tow my boat a couple of times a year? Also, towing a boat trailer has nothing to do with fifth wheel towing. Thanks for the hunting advice though.... Who are you and why are you so defensive about the poor fuel economey of this truck? Do you own one or just offer sarcastic advice???
#26 of 146 Not quite. by mschmal Jul 31, 2007 (10:23 am)
People are comparing the Fuel Econ of the F-450 to other pickups that they owned or drove. That is unfair. The F-450 is a commercial vehicle. Why don't you ask a guy with a dump body or a cube van what kind of fuel econ he is getting because those are more comparable trucks. My post was for people in general who may be looking to buy a truck. It is very easy to get the idea that you need an F-450 from some sales man looking for a fat commission. However, a real sales person will work with you to match the truck you buy to your needs. If you only conventional tow, and don't fifth wheel tow, you really don't need a F-450 at all as the F-450 only gives you 1,000 more pounds of conventional towing vs the F-350 DRW. That extra 1,000 pounds is from having the 4.88 super tall rear end. If you purchased a F-450 because the F-350 was not enough truck to meet your towing needs then I feel you have no right to complain. F-450 is the only factory built pickup in its class. Your other choice would be nothing. If the F-350 is enough truck to meet your needs but you purchased the F-450 anyway then why are you mad at Ford? Mark Replies to this message: losman54 (Aug 15, 2007 6:34 am) mnjtrans (Aug 27, 2007 1:09 pm) mschmal (Aug 28, 2007 3:18 pm) losman54 (Aug 29, 2007 2:33 pm)