You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Saturn Aura
Midsize Sedans 2.0

13336 messages, Last post on Dec 05, 2009 at 4:32 PM
You are in the Saturn Aura Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: deltheking (Oct 19, 2009 7:47 am) This is defintely your opinion and certainly not any kind of consensus that I've read. I think the vast majority of owners and professional reviewers would disagree with your assessment and is probably the reason, as you say, "it is so popular and is selling well." I tend to agree with you on the Sonata though. From what I've seen of the Korean market model, if they don't change it a lot or eliminate some of the bells and whistles, it will be a much bigger contender than it already is when they start selling it here.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: m6user (Oct 19, 2009 7:35 am) The Taurus is the same car that Ford tried to market as the "500" which was a full size sedan. Ford used the "500" on cars back in the 60's with the Galaxy and Fairlane names. For some reason Ford sales of the "500" were really bad. Marketing decided that it was just the name that turned off buyers so they renamed the "500" the Taurus, because the Taurus models sold well. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: acdii (Oct 19, 2009 4:50 am) You do have the ability to start in any gear wit the Ford don't you? |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: deltheking (Oct 19, 2009 7:47 am) car in the midsize class that I can think of maybe the Mazda6, 2010 or 2011 may see others follow suite another change f/ Hyundai is in the works. According to auto industry stats I have seen and read about, show slump in sales for all the car makers midsize sedans, except 1, their sales actually jumped up 15% f/2009. Which prompted them to hire more people to step up production in Alabama. I didn't hear about that company getting a hand out of our tax money to stay afloat. The company I bought all my vehicles from since early sixties must not take very good care of their business. They got a big chunk of the tax money bail out and still have serious financial problems. Since 1995 I stopped buying their cars they have dropped 2 of their car lines completely (the kind I bought) and 2 more that has been put on the discontinue or get rid of list. So my conclusion is, if they don't want them I deffintly don't want them either!! Imagine if you have one of those and the dealership closes you got it from and the nearest one is kind of far away who will work on it if needed especially under warranty. Well I have been there with that deal and sorry but not again. I will stick with growing carmakers that put their customers wants on top of their list, and really want to stay in business. I am not that crazy about buying from a foreign company, but at least the 1 I just bought is engineered and built here in our USA and their job looks secure for the near future not like what is going on with some suppose to be BIG DOG companies here. Thanks Hyundai for stepping up your game.
|
|
|
Replying to: m6user (Oct 19, 2009 9:03 am) I talked with a friend at church yesterday who is looking to buy a new car for the first time in many years. She was thinking of an Altima. I asked her what else she had tried. Drove the Malibu--didn't like it. Drove the Sonata--was OK except the Altima's driver's seat was more comfortable. Doesn't want a Camry--period. Thinks the Accord is nice but overpriced. She has not looked at the Fusion yet. I recommended she do that before jumping for the Altima, as she will do a lot of highway driving and wants a big trunk, and the Fusion does very well in both categories, plus it should cost less than the Altima (although I am seeing some good deals on closeout 2009 Altimas right now). Also I recommended she look at certified used cars e.g. Altima and Fusion, to save some money. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: imidazol97 (Oct 19, 2009 5:21 am) powerful drivetrain, good MPG f/ that generation. Only problem I had with that set up and car was Mass air sensor and fuel pump in tank, had the same problem with all three, I almost forgot a lot of alternator trouble. Kind of miss the bigger car and the carmaker, but if they don't want them I don't either. Best GM engine IMO was the old 283, 327 and 350 4 bolt main but they did burn a lot of gas! Using an old famous closing; "GOOD DAY" |
|
|
Replying to: phaetondriver (Oct 19, 2009 9:34 am) About the only thing that didn't change was the base 3.5L drivetrain.
|
|
|
Replying to: akirby (Oct 19, 2009 10:35 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: backy (Oct 19, 2009 11:59 am) |
|
|
Replying to: stephen987 (Oct 18, 2009 6:41 pm) It's slightly better, and mostly due to better brakes and tires than anything else. The upgraded suspension option on the top end Buicks and the Cadillacs made them actually better cars by far to drive than the competition(European makes aside, of course, but then again 10-30K more money kind of SHOULD be better...). It's like comparing the Lucerne CXS versus the competition it's vastly, no WORLDS better than the non CXS mode(stabilitrak/magnetic suspension/V8/etc). It handles great for its size, has tons of torque, and is a beautiful car that reminds you of what Mercedes was making in their mid to late 90s S class. Which is high praise indeed if GM can equal Mercedes older models in ten years time, give or take. That they decided to update it and make it the basis for the new LaCrosse is a good thing. Just PLEASE get/try to top end suspension and engine version. It's well worth the time to find one. BTW, the LaCrosse CXS with the suspension upgrade is about 30K if you haggle and after rebates/etc. It's nearly the same car to drive as the CTS for less money(and dare I say, nicer interior and exterior as well) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Saturn Aura
Midsize Sedans 2.0
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2011 Hyundai Sonata
2010 Toyota Camry
2010 Honda Accord
2010 Nissan Altima
2010 Volkswagen Passat
2010 Mazda MAZDA6
2010 Ford Fusion
2010 Chevrolet Malibu
2009 Saturn Aura



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats