Sign In Join 



Midsize Sedans 2.0

13224 messages,  Last post on Nov 25, 2009 at 4:39 PM

You are in the Subaru Legacy & Outback Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Sonata, Toyota Camry, Honda Accord, Nissan Altima, Volkswagen Passat, Mazda MAZDA6, Ford Fusion, Chevrolet Malibu, Saturn Aura, Car Comparisons, Sedan


Messages Page 1309 of 1324
1
...
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
...
1324
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#13072 of 13224
Re: Suzuki Kizashi [explorerx4] by backy
Oct 17, 2009 (7:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: explorerx4 (Oct 17, 2009 6:28 pm)

These days one at least one of those "porky" mid-sized sedans can hit 147 mph - with 235 hp. According to the Scottsdale police, anyway. Since the maximum speed limit in my area of the country is less than half that, I think that provides more than enough cushion for whatever maneuvers I might need to make.
#13073 of 13224
Re: Suzuki Kizashi [backy] by explorerx4
Oct 17, 2009 (8:00 pm)
Reply

Replying to: backy (Oct 17, 2009 7:48 pm)

don't be coy. which one?
inquiring minds want to know.
#13074 of 13224
Re: Suzuki Kizashi [explorerx4] by thegraduate
Oct 17, 2009 (8:01 pm)
Reply

Replying to: explorerx4 (Oct 17, 2009 8:00 pm)

Hyundai Sonata, with the 3.3L.
 
Car and Driver or Motor Trend ran a story on it months (if not a year plus) ago.
#13075 of 13224
Re: Suzuki Kizashi [backy] by elroy5
Oct 17, 2009 (9:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: backy (Oct 17, 2009 4:29 pm)

I don't see anyone expecting 24 airbags yet. To me, that's the equivalent of expecting more horsepower in a mid-sized family sedan than in a V8 supercar from not long ago.
 
1992 is long ago, as far as midsize sedans go. The 92 Accord didn't even offer a V6 engine, but it was much smaller and lighter than the Accord of today. Some people want every safety item they can possibly get, and some want all the power they can get. My 03 Accord has 100 more horse power than my 92 did, but imo it needs that power to move the extra size and weight. The 03, even with the V6 engine, gets the same mileage as the 92 around town, and better mileage on the highway. I call that progress.
 
Where does this power competition end?
 
It will never end. I would not buy a certain car, just because it has 10 more hp than another, but I will take what ever I can get, in the car I want. There are 4 cylinder versions and hybrids, for those of you who don't want the extra power. I'll take 300hp or even 400hp, if I can get it for my price range.
#13076 of 13224
Re: Suzuki Kizashi [backy] by 8babies1dog
Oct 18, 2009 (9:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: backy (Oct 17, 2009 7:48 pm)

Just to add a little about the "porky" Sonata it was a 2006 model and a rental car
according to article on MSN news. Have 2009 SE V6 since July 2009 now have 10,000k+ miles (travel a lot) 2000k mile trip ave over 31MPG did see 36.1 on trip
computer, under controlled driving 47MPH 1300RPM f/ 30+ miles. I also have
a Mazda 2.5Lv6-166HP no trip com. best ever calculated about 28MPG O.K. but
not good enough f/ HP to MPG ratio, compared to 3.3Lv6-249HP. This some of my
research done before purchasing Sonata. For general info purposes. All these were
listed in midsize sedan comparison rated by EPA standards, compiled from sites
like Edmunds, car&driver, Motor trend, kbb, jd power etc. Check it out interesting!
All also 2009 new V6 w/ Auto trans.
 
Acura TL 3.5-280HP 0-60 6.7 17-25 EPA mpg total interior volume 111.3 wt 3708
Aura 3.6-252 0-60 7.3 17-26EPA mpg interior volume 113cuft wt 3613
Cadillac CTS 3.6-263 0-60 6.4 17-26EPa mpg interior volume 112 3874
Altima 3.5-270 0-60 6.0 19-26Epa mpg interior volume 116 wt 3355
Malibu 3.6-252 0-60 6.6 17-26EPA mpg interior volume 112.8 wt 3436
Accord 3.5-271 0-60 5.9 19-29EPA mpg interior volume 115 wt 3600
Mazda6 3.7-272 0-60 6.4 17-25EPA mpg interior volume 118.9 wt 3547
Camrey 3.5-268 0-60 6.2 19-28EPA mpg interior volume 116.4 wt 3483
Fushion 3.0-221 0-60 8.5 18-25EPA mpg interior volume 116.2 wt 3325
Sonata 3.3-249 0-60 6.7 19-29EPA mpg interior volume 121.8 wt 3549
 
Interior volume is calculated total passenger & cargo. The new road test was done
on the Sonata SE V6 mainly because the prior 0-60 was done before the midseason upgrade on 2009 edition, done by independand test group f/ Car&drivers
request. I did not try mine 0-60 nor did I try to go 147 miles per hour I will take their
word for it. We did not by this thing to race or thinking in any kind of way it is some
kind of sports car never saw Hyundai addvertise it as such, they modified the SE to
have little sportier look and feel and in my opinion thats what I got, just that! I have had sport type cars before in my younger days, way to expensive to buy and use,
gas guzzlers. Thanks for your valuable time and happy driving or car hunting which
ever comes first. OH by the way my wife and I luv everything about this car, this is
my 22nd car purchase since early sixties and so for is the best. What a warranty.
Old days you got 12 month 12K miles, at least Hyundai believes it,s the best.
#13077 of 13224
Re: Suzuki Kizashi [acdii] by m6user
Oct 18, 2009 (9:30 am)
Reply

Replying to: acdii (Oct 17, 2009 7:06 pm)

I don't know how many family midsize sedan buyers are measuring their own 0-60 times. I enjoy some power but it's been many, many years since I timed my cars 0-60 or whatever. I rely on the professional reviewers to give those stats and then I compare them relatively.
 
I was talking about the EPA hwy mpg ratings. Not what one person can get. I think most people can get 2-4 better mpg than the EPA ratings on a pure hwy trip. I believe the Fusion Sport is rated 27 mpg hwy by the EPA. Like I said, a V6 with reasonable hp that is EPA rated at 30-32 would be very nice IMO.
#13078 of 13224
Re: Suzuki Kizashi [8babies1dog] by mickeyrom
Oct 18, 2009 (10:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: 8babies1dog (Oct 18, 2009 9:19 am)

"porky" Sonata? What the hell does that mean.I leased a 2006 Sonata and thought it was a very nice car.
As far as MPG goes...my 2006.5 Optima has averaged over 30MPG for 34,000 miles.Sometimes more and sometimes less,but overall OVER 30.AC on included.I do drive at posted limits.
#13079 of 13224
Re: Suzuki Kizashi [acdii] by phaetondriver
Oct 18, 2009 (11:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: acdii (Oct 17, 2009 7:06 pm)

I wonder why you have a problem hooking up with the goodyears? My 07 Aura XR with LS2's has provided me several runs 0-60 in 6 .0 and 6.1 sec. I turn off the T/C, do a burn out to warm the tires and turn T/C back on. Without it I can't get the tires to stop spinning for the first 60 feet or so.
Not sure what the Fusion weighs but is can't be much more than the Aura.Try my method and see if you can't get your times down to the 6's at least.
#13080 of 13224
Re: Suzuki Kizashi [mickeyrom] by m6user
Oct 18, 2009 (11:17 am)
Reply

Replying to: mickeyrom (Oct 18, 2009 10:32 am)

Don't get excited. The reference was to Backy's comment about heavy midsize cars a couple of posts back. Also, I know the post was hard to read because of syntax/grammar but he was actually complementing the 2009 Sonata V6 SE which he owns. He also stated that he got better hwy mpg than you do with your Optima!
#13081 of 13224
Re: Suzuki Kizashi [elroy5] by mz6greyghost
Oct 18, 2009 (1:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: elroy5 (Oct 17, 2009 9:59 pm)

1992 is long ago, as far as midsize sedans go. The 92 Accord didn't even offer a V6 engine, but it was much smaller and lighter than the Accord of today. Some people want every safety item they can possibly get, and some want all the power they can get. My 03 Accord has 100 more horse power than my 92 did, but imo it needs that power to move the extra size and weight. The 03, even with the V6 engine, gets the same mileage as the 92 around town, and better mileage on the highway. I call that progress.
 
+1
 
It will never end. I would not buy a certain car, just because it has 10 more hp than another, but I will take what ever I can get, in the car I want. There are 4 cylinder versions and hybrids, for those of you who don't want the extra power. I'll take 300hp or even 400hp, if I can get it for my price range.
 
+2
 
You may not see the sense in a high-HP V6 for a midsize sedan. But for those that do, they'll take more power in a package that suits them. In the end, that's all that matters.
 
I stand by my comment about the HP for the GM V6. If (and that's a big IF) Suzuki gives a slight bump to the HP (say 260-265), maintains the smaller proportions, AND keeps the weight down, they might have another new owner come next summer. I'll still take one out for a test-drive or two, but I've witnessed the V6 firsthand on both the Aura and Malibu, and IMO it doesn't help to make a sale compared to the Honda, Mazda, or Ford V6.

Messages Page 1309 of 1324
1
...
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
...
1324
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement