Sign In Join 



Midsize Sedans 2.0

13361 messages,  Last post on Dec 08, 2009 at 4:13 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Sonata, Toyota Camry, Honda Accord, Nissan Altima, Volkswagen Passat, Mazda MAZDA6, Ford Fusion, Chevrolet Malibu, Saturn Aura, Car Comparisons, Sedan


Messages Page 1337 of 1337
1
...
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#13352 of 13361
GM's hot new entry, the reborn Regal... by kdhspyder
Dec 08, 2009 (1:59 pm)
Reply
...is due here next Fall. But from the recently announced specs how is this new entry going to compete in this category with a 188hp 2.4L SIDI engine that is supposed to get 30mph Highway?
 
To me this vehicle would have be be drop dead gorgeous, Lexus/BMW quality inside and out and handle like it was on rails otherwise it will be killed by just about every other midsizer on the road including GM's own Malibu.
 
Why? The rest of the industry has V6's with 250+ hp and fuel economy ratings in the 30 mpg range. The Sonata is dropping its V6's in favor of offering better fuel economy approaching 40 mpg. This sounds so 1995-ish on GM's part. Do they think that Buick buyers are stupid? How would this launch go if gas spikes up over $3.50 next summer?
#13353 of 13361
Re: Accord vs. 2011 Sonata [jeffyscott] by kdhspyder
Dec 08, 2009 (2:01 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jeffyscott (Dec 08, 2009 12:14 pm)

The current 2.5L Camry gets a real world 37-39 mpg at moderate highway cruising speeds of ~65 mph. I agree that every vehicle now can exceed the very conservative EPA numbers.
#13354 of 13361
mpg by benjaminh
Dec 08, 2009 (2:09 pm)
Reply
Hmmm....I guess so. My 08 Accord is rated at 31 hwy, and 30-31 is about what I get--but that's at 75 mpg, ac on, 4 passengers, + luggage.
#13355 of 13361
Re: mpg [benjaminh] by kdhspyder
Dec 08, 2009 (2:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: benjaminh (Dec 08, 2009 2:09 pm)

Yep that's a lot of weight, draw on the engine and above 70 mph drag is a much bigger factor. That's what the new EPA values are supposed to represent, typical or even worst-case scenarios.
#13356 of 13361
Re: GM's hot new entry, the reborn Regal... [kdhspyder] by m6user
Dec 08, 2009 (2:20 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kdhspyder (Dec 08, 2009 1:59 pm)

The rest of the industry has V6's with 250+ hp and fuel economy ratings in the 30 mpg range
 
Not to be picky but can you name one V6 w/250+ hp that is rated at 30mpg or better by the EPA? I'm not talking real world cause that can be all over the map but actual rated by EPA at 30 or better.
 
I totally agree about the Buick. GM had better start matching up w/ the competition with Buick or it's going to be history. You gotta have something special if you're going to try to market yourself as a semi premium brand like they are trying to do with the LaCrosse especially when you've got a negative perception to live down.
#13357 of 13361
Re: GM's hot new entry, the reborn Regal... [kdhspyder] by explorerx4
Dec 08, 2009 (2:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kdhspyder (Dec 08, 2009 1:59 pm)

i don't know what the actual ratings will be (or real world mileage), but a 4 will probably get a noticeably higher city rating than a 6.
#13358 of 13361
Re: GM's hot new entry, the reborn Regal... [m6user] by kdhspyder
Dec 08, 2009 (3:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: m6user (Dec 08, 2009 2:20 pm)

Note the wording...
 
The rest of the industry has V6's with 250+ hp and fuel economy ratings in the 30 mpg range
I didn't say 30 mpg min.
 
But just to mention two in that range..
 
Camry V6, 268 hp and 28 mpg
Avalon, 268 hp and 28 mpg
#13359 of 13361
Re: mpg [kdhspyder] by jeffyscott
Dec 08, 2009 (3:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kdhspyder (Dec 08, 2009 2:11 pm)

My eyeballs see about 10% drop in mpg for every 5 mph increase at freeway speeds here: http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/driveHabits.shtml
 
So going 70 instead of 75 could mean ~34 mpg instead of 30-31.
#13360 of 13361
Re: GM's hot new entry, the reborn Regal... [kdhspyder] by explorerx4
Dec 08, 2009 (3:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kdhspyder (Dec 08, 2009 3:09 pm)

so why are you trying to be obtuse?
it just makes it seem like you are trying to confuse things.
#13361 of 13361
Re: Accord vs. 2011 Sonata [benjaminh] by backy
Dec 08, 2009 (4:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: benjaminh (Dec 08, 2009 3:28 am)

Have you driven the Fusion? Personally I prefer its blend of ride and handling over the Accord. I think the current-gen Accord has lost some of its handling crispness from past generations, albeit is smoother without the "feel every pebble" ride from pre-2008. But the Fusion is smoother still yet with sharp handling, at least as good as the current Accord's IMO.
 
As for manual transmissions... we'll have to see if the 6-speed in the new Sonata is as good as the 5-speed in the Accord. The last Hyundai I had with a stick was a 2001 Elantra, and its shift feel was "OK" but didn't have the Honda crispness. I'll bet though that MT Sonatas will be a very small percentage of the 2011 units, especially with the 6AT with paddle shifters available.

Messages Page 1337 of 1337
1
...
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement