Sign In Join 



Midsize Sedans 2.0

13222 messages,  Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 7:26 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Sonata, Toyota Camry, Honda Accord, Nissan Altima, Volkswagen Passat, Mazda MAZDA6, Ford Fusion, Chevrolet Malibu, Saturn Aura, Car Comparisons, Sedan


Messages Page 952 of 1323
1
...
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
...
1323
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#9506 of 13222
Re: Malibu Vs Accord Vs Camry vs Sonata [lilengineerboy] by captain2
May 01, 2008 (5:47 am)
Reply

Replying to: lilengineerboy (Apr 30, 2008 2:15 pm)

huh? Premium is NOT required for either the VQ or the 2GR either. It is that contrast specifically with engines like this that accentuate what a V6 (in this example) SHOULD BE. Ford would do well to take some pointers from the GM 3.6 in the Malibu or even the 3.3 in the Sonata, and forget about trying to compete with the other two!
#9507 of 13222
Re: Malibu Vs Accord Vs Camry vs Sonata [captain2] by mz6greyghost
May 01, 2008 (6:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: captain2 (May 01, 2008 5:42 am)

It is not just me that has seemingly written the 'new' DT off, reference that Taurus test in the February CR I referenced.
 
Of course, since CR (a magazine that tests toasters and fabric softeners) is such an "authority" on cars. Right...
 
This thread was seemingly started by conversations about this 'great new Mazda' 3.7, which I regard as still a DT and still a Ford engine. I only wish that the Speed6 hadn't been so short lived.
 
...And I only wished you weren't so short-sighted.
 
The "great new Mazda 3.7L" seem to have some merit, since it's included in the CX-9, winner of the North American Truck of the Year. Motor Trend picked it as it's SUV of the Year, saying the 3.7L "behaves in a silky, refined matter, accentuated by a sporty growl from the dual exhaust"(Motor Trend, December 2007). Car and Driver named it one of the 5-Best Trucks. I've seen nothing but praise for the CX-9, and the 3.7L is part of the reason.
 
Go ahead and put down the DT based on your limited experience with the 3.0L, but I've always gone on the phrase "Don't knock it until you've tried it." I've personally driven the CX-9 with the new 3.7L, and it's a HUGE step up from the 3.0L in my Mazda6, both in power and smoothness, and it'll make an excellent engine in the upcoming 6.
#9508 of 13222
Re: Malibu Vs Accord Vs Camry vs Sonata [mz6greyghost] by captain2
May 01, 2008 (6:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: mz6greyghost (May 01, 2008 6:21 am)

I've personally driven the CX-9 with the new 3.7L, and it's a HUGE step up from the 3.0L in my Mazda6, both in power and smoothness,
 
50 or 60 HP will do that, won't it, even in a heavier vehicle like the CX - making it unnecessary perhaps to wring every last bit of available power our of it as you did out of the 3.0. I 'm sorry but the the 3.0 at 5000 rpm is anything but 'fun' and I read the same sort of thing about the 3.5 and likewise have experienced it in the similar Edge - and I'm not nearly the only one - even if you don't like what an organization like CR has to say. It does lead one to the inescapable conclusion that there is whole lot more of the 3.0 in the 3.5 (and possibly the 3.7) than Ford or Mazda would have us believe.
 I would suggest to you that the CX9 win in TOY has more to do with what the vehicle does unrelated to what happens to be under the hood - as is a tradition of sorts with Mazda products. Mazda, in particular, has always made a specific type of vehicle (call it 'zoom-zoom if you must) and done it well.
#9509 of 13222
Re: Malibu Vs Accord Vs Camry vs Sonata [captain2] by aviboy97
May 01, 2008 (6:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: captain2 (May 01, 2008 5:42 am)

I only wish that the Speed6 hadn't been so short lived.
 
+1000!
 
The Speed6 is a total marketing blunder by Mazda. That car is a prime example of how not to market a car.
 
autoblog.com reported that a new Mazda6 MPS (Mazdaspeed in Japan and North America) is on the way with a 2.5L turbo and 280hp and AWD. I highly doubt it will make it over here. With the Mazda6 V6 putting down 270hp, I really don't see many people making the jump to the Mazdaspeed. Personally, I really think a new Mazdaspeed6 would need at least 300hp to be a success here in NA.
#9510 of 13222
Re: Malibu Vs Accord Vs Camry vs Sonata [aviboy97] by captain2
May 01, 2008 (7:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: aviboy97 (May 01, 2008 6:59 am)

whether you like boosting the bejeepers out of something to get that kind of power or not, the Speed6 at least was a car with the 'right stuff'. It was awfully expensive I guess and would otherwise leave the other V6 engined cars in this group in the dust. An ATed Duratech 3.7 270hp as a Mazdaspeed anything is a contradiction in terms.
#9511 of 13222
Re: 09 Sonata on Hyundaiusa.com [maxamillion1] by backy
May 01, 2008 (7:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: maxamillion1 (Apr 30, 2008 11:05 pm)

The weird thing is, the 2009 Sonata SE I4 is priced higher than the Limited but doesn't have anywhere close to the equipment level of the Limited. Now that there's no stick on the SE, and the price has gone WAY up (nearly $3000 more than the 2008 SE I4 w/stick, although the 2009 has the 5AT), I wonder how many of those SEs they will sell?
 
Edit: Just noticed there's an error on hyundaiusa.com. The Compare Trims page says the I4 is standard on the SE and V6 is optional. But other pages, including Build Your Own, are clear that the V6 is standard on the SE. That would explain why the SE costs more than the Limited I4.
#9512 of 13222
Re: Malibu Vs Accord Vs Camry vs Sonata [aviboy97] by ccd1
May 01, 2008 (8:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: aviboy97 (May 01, 2008 6:59 am)

And that would bring the MS6 in head to head competition with the STI and EVO
#9513 of 13222
Re: Malibu Vs Accord Vs Camry vs Sonata [oldcem] by kdshapiro
May 01, 2008 (8:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: oldcem (Apr 30, 2008 7:08 pm)

272 6650 232 ft·lb 2750-4250 . Don't think the Duratech is quite in the same league.
#9514 of 13222
Re: Malibu Vs Accord Vs Camry vs Sonata [kdshapiro] by aviboy97
May 01, 2008 (9:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: kdshapiro (May 01, 2008 8:42 am)

Where did you get those power numbers for the DT37? Also, which application was it for?
 
Numbers I have seen, and probably not supposed to see, was 270hp and 268tq for the 3.7 in the Mazda6.
#9515 of 13222
Re: Malibu Vs Accord Vs Camry vs Sonata [captain2] by aviboy97
May 01, 2008 (9:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: captain2 (May 01, 2008 7:21 am)

An ATed Duratech 3.7 270hp as a Mazdaspeed anything is a contradiction in terms.
 
You got that right....

Messages Page 952 of 1323
1
...
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
...
1323
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement