Sign In Join 



Midsize Sedans 2.0

13330 messages,  Last post on Dec 03, 2009 at 1:25 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Sonata, Toyota Camry, Honda Accord, Nissan Altima, Volkswagen Passat, Mazda MAZDA6, Ford Fusion, Chevrolet Malibu, Saturn Aura, Car Comparisons, Sedan


Messages Page 878 of 1334
1
...
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
...
1334
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#8765 of 13330
Re: Hyundai more expensive than Camry and Malibu [elroy5] by backy
Feb 08, 2008 (9:27 pm)
Reply

Replying to: elroy5 (Feb 08, 2008 8:31 pm)

According to price data at Edmunds.com, the blog entry is in error. The list price of the base 2009 Sonata, the GLS 5MT, is $18,795 including destination charge. The list price of the base 2009 Camry, the CE 5MT, is $19,380. However, if you want ESC, which is standard on the Sonata, that's an additional $650 on the Camry, so the price difference becomes $1235. So the Sonata is not more expensive than the Camry.
 
As for the Malibu, the least-expensive Malibu is $19,995 including destination. It has a 4AT but no ESC (or body side moldings for that matter, they are $150 extra). The least expensive Sonata with an AT (5AT with Shifttronic) is $19,995--the same as the base Malibu w/o ESC. The least expensive Malibu with ESC is $21,280.
 
Don't believe everything you read in a blog.
#8766 of 13330
got to have it factor joke by choe13
Feb 09, 2008 (12:47 am)
Reply
Honestly the got it factor is a joke plain and simple. I rather have excellent safety capabilities criteria which is alot more important in this type vehicle = family mid size.
 
If i could make up a ridiculous criteria it would be "ugly factor" which then the accord would accumulate pts in minuses. It is one ugly car inside and out.
#8767 of 13330
Re: got to have it factor joke [choe13] by lilengineerboy
Feb 09, 2008 (6:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: choe13 (Feb 09, 2008 12:47 am)

You also have to remember that no one on this forum represents a "typical" buyer if simply because they are users of this forum. They are more educated with respect to automotive technologies, and certainly more motivated to push an agenda (thats not bad, people here talk about what they like).
I would thing consumers who are willing to buy a sport oriented magazine dedicated to cars would also be in that category. I definitely agree that its silly. I could see like MSN doing something like that or some other online type thing, but not a true car magazine, nor an anticar magazine like CR.
#8768 of 13330
Re: got to have it factor joke [lilengineerboy] by elroy5
Feb 09, 2008 (7:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: lilengineerboy (Feb 09, 2008 6:12 am)

CR reports on what cars people buy, and why. When some people saw the new 08 Accord, they thought, "I gotta have it". Just because you are not one of these people, doesn't mean they don't exist.
#8769 of 13330
Re: Accord not the ugly duckling anymore? [kdshapiro] by aviboy97
Feb 09, 2008 (10:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: kdshapiro (Feb 07, 2008 4:19 pm)

People in Fairfield are in BMW and MB terriority
 
I see way too many BMW's and MB's. Not to mention every other lux vehicle made. However, there are a lot of people that don't need the lux name, so they buy the blue collar equivalent. That was mainly what I was referring to.
#8770 of 13330
Re: got to have it factor joke [elroy5] by choe13
Feb 09, 2008 (10:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: elroy5 (Feb 09, 2008 7:04 am)

naw what is offensive is that car and driver actually act like some cars are got to have and others are plain old potato. Its tiring that they think they are the gods of the car auto magazine industry when they are really not. A website like edmunds does a far better job in evaluating cars fairly with the right criterias for different classes and have a staff who are mostly made up of average joes but know their cars. (smart buyers)
 
Car and driver should have been smarter and maybe instead of labeling it got to have it factor, label it like intangibles factor or nothing at all.
 
The last point i want to make about this argument is that the sonata was not once criticized in their article except the fact it has more body roll then they preferred yet it is a quiet car. And that was pretty much it. Even the altima and accord got critized more it seemed with either being a little too sporty and not quiet enough, complex interior design etc. Its just funny that on the article about the car you have nothing bad to say about it calling it quiet and smooth(But to expect no body roll ), great value, overall competent etc yet its still placed 4th. Next time they should make up their minds and if it is quiet quit complaining it has some body roll because you can't have a car in this class which has both amazing handling and quietness.
 
just my 2 cents
#8771 of 13330
Re: got to have it factor joke [elroy5] by lilengineerboy
Feb 09, 2008 (10:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: elroy5 (Feb 09, 2008 7:04 am)

CR reports on what cars people buy, and why.
 
No, CR reports on how vehicles match up with their selected criteria. They actually don't appear to care at all about what people actually buy, nor why. If they went off what everyone else did, that would make them not so independent, no?
The closest thing they have is "would you buy that car again," which still seems like a relatively worthless criteria. My life situation changes considerably between vehicles (or even over the last year or so) and its unlikely I would buy either car I have again; one due to availability, and one due to its blah.
 
When some people saw the new 08 Accord, they thought, "I gotta have it". Just because you are not one of these people, doesn't mean they don't exist.
 
And I have no problem with that, but C&D doesn't know if or how many exist either. If it is their way of saying "among our testers, this was their favorite" then that would make sense.
#8772 of 13330
Re: got to have it factor joke [choe13] by backy
Feb 09, 2008 (12:00 pm)
Reply

Replying to: choe13 (Feb 09, 2008 10:31 am)

Based on C/D's criteria, too much body roll for their taste plus slower acceleration in the 1/4 mile plus the subjective factors like "gotta have it", were enough to put the Sonata 4th in the scoring. But as we've been reminded by other posters here, the raw scores don't tell the whole story. As you noted, the comments from C/D's editors were very positive about the Sonata, except for having too much body roll for their taste and a wish for the structure to be as stiff as the Accord's and Altima's, two newer designs. So when you look at the overall picture, and how the Sonata scored just 2 points overall (or about 1%) behind one of C/D's 10Best, the Malibu (and beat it on Vehicle and Powertrain), and tied another C/D 10Best, the Accord, on Vehicle and got nipped on Powertrain only because of being 0.4 seconds slower in the 1/4 mile test, I think it was a very impressive showing for a refresh of a car that debuted in late 2004 (in the home market), up against newer designs from Honda, Nissan, and Chevy.
#8773 of 13330
Re: Accord not the ugly duckling anymore? [kdshapiro] by bhmr59
Feb 09, 2008 (12:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kdshapiro (Feb 07, 2008 4:19 pm)

Obviously you do not live in Fairfield County, or you are in lower Farifield County...that's where the big bucks are.
 
Most of Fairfield County residents aren't rich. Housing costs are very high. Gasoline at the lowest place in my area just dropped to $3.19, although 15 miles away it's 10 cents cheaper. My gas heat bill issued 2/6/08, 32 day period, 921 degree days, 274 CCF of usage (we have programmable thermostats with the heat at 62 to 65 almost all time time, one 264 sq ft room on it's own heating zone is at 70 for 5 hours) was $414. Electric bill, 30 days, 563Kwh = $126.
 
Yeah, in our town there's BMWs, some MBs, a lot of new(er) SUVs. Most of those BMWs & MBs are purchased to impress and most of them are not bought new.
 
Some people prefer a new reliable car and others will buy a few year old name badge. I guess I don't live in the right part of Fairfield County and certainly don't have a high enough income to have hired help, never mind buying a car for that hired help.
#8774 of 13330
Re: Accord not the ugly duckling anymore? [bhmr59] by kdshapiro
Feb 09, 2008 (12:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bhmr59 (Feb 09, 2008 12:03 pm)

My bad, I confused your part of town with Greenwich. My point still stands though.

Messages Page 878 of 1334
1
...
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
...
1334
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement