Sign In Join 



Midsize Sedans 2.0

13340 messages,  Last post on Dec 06, 2009 at 10:12 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Sonata, Toyota Camry, Honda Accord, Nissan Altima, Volkswagen Passat, Mazda MAZDA6, Ford Fusion, Chevrolet Malibu, Saturn Aura, Car Comparisons, Sedan


Messages Page 680 of 1335
1
...
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
...
1335
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#6788 of 13340
Re: What so special about these "top rated" cars? [elroy5] by pengwin
Oct 27, 2007 (6:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: elroy5 (Oct 27, 2007 5:57 pm)

Ditto. Too many designs, competing for the same midsize buyer. Since Chevy is the most popular brand, Saturn, Pontiac, and Buick would have to go. At least two of those three. And isn't the Saab 9-3 competing for the same customers too? Way too much spent on one size platform, IMO.
 
better yet, combine Saab and Cadillac and form one brand, Caddy could learn a lot from Saab. Like how to install a decent turbocharger.
#6789 of 13340
Re: What so special about these "top rated" cars? [pengwin] by backy
Oct 27, 2007 (8:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pengwin (Oct 27, 2007 5:43 pm)

Yes, when cost cutting affects quality, that's none too good. It's a tough mission to cut costs without affecting quality. There's some ways to cut costs while improving quality, but when those are used up...
 
If you can get a 2008 Passat 2.0T for $22k and like the car, why not just go ahead and get one? You said you were concerned about reliability (wrt the Korean cars). Have you taken a look at the reliability record of the 2.0T? For example, CR won't even recommend it because of poor reliability.
 
On the 2008 Accord, good luck getting anything more than an LX-P AT for $22k right now, until the new-design hoopla wears off. Have you seen the lease ads for the Accord lately? A few months ago they were $199/month for either an LX or SE-V6 (2007 models). Now they're $259/month for an LX, with about the same money down.
 
I haven't seen a hard plastic steering wheel for a long time--maybe not since my mom's 1980 Omega. That wheel was not only hard, but shiny, with faux wood trim. Cars today (the cars in this class at least) either have padded plastic or leather-covered wheels.
 
Re profit and quality: Toyota is a very profitable company. But you used the Camry as an example of slipping quality. If any company could afford to put a few more bucks into quality interiors, it would be Toyota. But it's not a priority for them. Why? Because look how many people buy the Camry with its interior with ill-fitting seams--an interior that was compared unfavorably to the less expensive Optima's in C/D's last mid-sized car comparo. As long as so many people flock into Toyota dealerships to buy cars like the Camry in huge numbers, why should Toyota put their profits into improving interiors? Maybe when more car buyers take notice and start looking elsewhere, as you have done, Toyota will do something about it.
#6790 of 13340
Re: What so special about these "top rated" cars? [pengwin] by pmerk28
Oct 27, 2007 (8:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pengwin (Oct 27, 2007 5:43 pm)

Pengwin: the fit/finish and quality of materials used in the interiors of cars has nose dived the past 2 years with few exceptions. I leased a 2000 Toyota Solara SLE with leather and owned a 2005 Camry XLE with leather. Both of these cars had thick padded dashes, soft touch materials throughout and impeccable fit/finish. I currently own a 2005 Sienna and the the interior is very good. I leased a 2003 Mercury Mountaineer with leather and the interior quality was very good. I have a 1991 Camry and the interior is padded everywhere, same thing with a 1988 Accord I once owned.
 
The following is a list of cars whose quality of interior materials and or fit/finish is worse than the previous generation. This is based on my either have test driven them/ sitting in them at auto shows or reading reviews on them ( and seeing photos online or in magazines):
 
2008 Accord
2007 and up Camry
2007 BMW 5 Series
2006 and up VW Passat
2008 Mercedes Benz C Class
2008 Ford Focus
2008 Toyota Highlander
Current Generation Toyota Corolla
Almost all Dodges/Chryslers have terrible interior quality
 
Only Nissan seems to have gotten better across the board.
#6791 of 13340
Re: What so special about these "top rated" cars? [pmerk28] by backy
Oct 27, 2007 (8:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pmerk28 (Oct 27, 2007 8:29 pm)

You didn't mention some other brands, e.g. Mazda (IMO the Mazda6's interior is superior to that of the last 626), GM (improving, comparing the latest cars e.g. Aura and Malibu to those of a few years ago), Hyundai/Kia (interiors of current Sonata and Optima are much better than those of the previous generation cars). So it seems some brands with a reputation for quality interiors are slipping, and some of those who needed to improve are improving. Maybe soon we'll have reached a level of similar quality across all but high-priced luxury cars.
#6792 of 13340
Re: What so special about these "top rated" cars? [backy] by pmerk28
Oct 27, 2007 (8:55 pm)
Reply

Replying to: backy (Oct 27, 2007 8:36 pm)

Backy: GM has nowhere to go but up but it is true the Caddy CTS is stunning inside and the Buick Enclave is gorgeous. The new Malibu interior was too cheap looking and feeling. I was dissapointed. The Mazda CX-9 is stunning inside. You are right about Hyundai as well.
 
Having owned a 2005 Camry, the minute I sat in the 2007 at the dealership I could tell in 5 seconds they cheapened it all over the place. The salesguy claimed Lexus complained that the top line Camry was stealing ES sales. Whatever the reason it still boggles my mind how people run to Toyota to A)trade in their current Camry for the new one and B)pay practically MSRP for it without noticing or caring about all the cheapness inside.
 
The Ford Fusion and Nissan Altima use better material inside than the new Camry.
#6793 of 13340
Is bigger...bloated? by zzzoom6
Oct 27, 2007 (10:15 pm)
Reply
The northwest has many endearing qualities, but sunny fall weekends are few and far between. So with the sun out and many trees' leaves dressed in fall colors, I thought it would be well worth driving through the Columbia River Gorge with it's amazing waterfalls and scenic views connected with miles of twisty roads and loads of elevation changes. Unfortunately though, much of the old Historic Columbia River Highway is very narrow with the some sections having just a dividing line on one side and barely the width of midsize car away is a concrete wall.
 
When going around a series of 20mph curves it occurred to me that I was lucky to have a car that had very precise steering and one that wasn't too wide. Having a large car or SUV would have made the drive not the joy that it was in the Mazda6 but instead an effort at accident avoidance. I know the trend is set that cars in this class will continue to get bigger in width and length and often in weight, but I can't help but think that maybe some cars are moving past what is necessary or needed to a size that is bloated and just an effort to achieve bragging rights.
#6794 of 13340
Re: What so special about these "top rated" cars? [pmerk28] by venus537
Oct 27, 2007 (10:53 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pmerk28 (Oct 27, 2007 8:29 pm)

"Only Nissan seems to have gotten better across the board."
 
Perhaps, but only because they had a lot of room for improvement.
 
When it comes to interior fit and finish it still comes down to VW, then Honda and then the rest.
 
I got to say it cracks me up when I read that someone's 1988 Accord interior is better in some way then today's Accord. I've owned Accords from that period and their interiors were top notch for the day but by today's standards they're pretty dreadful. I can guarantee you that after a 4 hour trip your back is going to feel much better in a 2008 Accord then a 1998 Accord.
 
One area where all the car manufacturers seem to be cutting cost is the protective moldings on the side of the car.
 
At least Audi seems to be keeping to their expected standards.
#6795 of 13340
Re: Most Wanted Re: the meaning of zoom-zoom [robertsmx] by jeffyscott
Oct 28, 2007 (7:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: robertsmx (Oct 24, 2007 12:22 pm)

I have seen several people complain about Camry being favored by CR as they recommend even the new model by default. That doesn’t seem to be an issue with Focus being recommended when it first came out.
 
I think this has been clarified by others already. The Focus had the highest score in their testing, this has nothing to do with reliability. On the pricing I was talking about the actual net transaction prices, not artificial figures like MSRP. By your own numbers Fit is comparably priced to Focus, since the rebate exceeds to $2000 price differential that you came up with. so far the Fusion has not required large incentives, but still selling prices are, I think, closer to the civic than to the Accord. Will the lower prices for comparable cars mean that Ford can still not afford to invest as much in upgrading the Fusion as Toyota and Honda can for the Accord and Camry???
 
BTW, you mentioned somewhere not subscribing to CR, I don't either, my library provides free online access (available from home with my library card number) to CR as well as hundreds of other magazines. In the case of CR there is a 3 month embargo. Check your library website, if my library that serves a population of only about 20,000 provides this access, I'm sure many others do also.
#6796 of 13340
Re: Most Wanted Re: the meaning of zoom-zoom [jeffyscott] by mickeyrom
Oct 28, 2007 (7:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: jeffyscott (Oct 28, 2007 7:02 am)

Ford can still not afford to invest as much in upgrading the Fusion
 
I have read that there will be a hybrid Fusion in 2008,but I seriously doubt that anyone will be able to find one at a dealer showroom.
#6797 of 13340
Re: Is bigger...bloated? [zzzoom6] by robertsmx
Oct 28, 2007 (7:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: zzzoom6 (Oct 27, 2007 10:15 pm)

Many sports cars are wider than one would thing they need to be. Corvette is 72.6", that might be comparable to many full size cars. And the new Nissan GT-R is supposed to be 2" wider! Thats SUV territory. Somehow I feel that carving those roads won't be bigger issue in those cars.
 
Its not the size, rather how cars drive. Some big cars drive small, and some small cars feel bigger than they are. This goes beyond spec sheet.

Messages Page 680 of 1335
1
...
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
...
1335
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement