Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Midsize Sedans 2.0
13143 messages, Last post on Nov 10, 2009 at 6:29 PM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: moparbad (Oct 25, 2007 8:25 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: robertsmx (Oct 25, 2007 9:03 am) You can find CR at your local library and see how it rates cars and reports on predicted reliability (no, it's not just on the Camry)--no subscription to CR is needed.
|
|
|
Replying to: robertsmx (Oct 25, 2007 9:04 am) Using the Civic which is now 1985 Accord sized as an example then yes they sell, and yes they are used by families. What size do you believe is required for "family" use? For the purpose of this discussion, using a family of four as a standard. Midsize car such as Malibu or Camry? Are they too small for four North Americans? 
|
|
|
Replying to: moparbad (Oct 25, 2007 10:17 am) Fit is somewhere between the first Accord (about half foot shorter) and first generation Civic (about half foot longer). Civic is about the size of an Accord from 25 years ago. If you think these two sizes are sufficient for American family sedan duties, then you need to look around. Accord outsells Civic and Fit combined. Is there an automaker that you know would gladly dismiss one of its midsizers and make a living by selling subcompact to compact cars for family vehicle duties? IMO, a car with good room for four, and decent cargo room makes for a good family car. It doesn't need to be as big as Taurus. And it cannot be Civic-sized either. Cars like Mazda6 are borderline acceptable. Take an average, and you just might find solid offerings from all automakers.
|
|
|
Replying to: backy (Oct 25, 2007 9:13 am) |
|
|
Replying to: robertsmx (Oct 25, 2007 11:27 am) The only way to stop this trend is for us American to stop getting fatter and fatter.
|
|
|
Replying to: robertsmx (Oct 25, 2007 11:28 am) It sounded like all new Toyota models were given the benefit of the doubt in the past, not just the Camry. I would assume Honda gets the same treatment but can't confirm that.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: akirby (Oct 25, 2007 12:21 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: akirby (Oct 25, 2007 12:21 pm) Honda does for the most part. They recommend almost every new vehicle they put out. When the RDX came out, it was recommended ASAP. |
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Oct 25, 2007 12:22 pm) Maybe because the 2nd gen Odyssey's were totally inconsistent, and had the faulty transmission bug. I don't know if the 3rd gen's have been much better. However, an Odyssey is still better then most van's. |
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2011 Hyundai Sonata
2010 Toyota Camry
2010 Honda Accord
2010 Nissan Altima
2010 Volkswagen Passat
2010 Mazda MAZDA6
2010 Ford Fusion
2010 Chevrolet Malibu
2009 Saturn Aura
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
