Sign In Join 



Midsize Sedans 2.0

13224 messages,  Last post on Nov 25, 2009 at 4:39 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Sonata, Toyota Camry, Honda Accord, Nissan Altima, Volkswagen Passat, Mazda MAZDA6, Ford Fusion, Chevrolet Malibu, Saturn Aura, Car Comparisons, Sedan


Messages Page 671 of 1323
1
...
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
...
1323
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#6700 of 13224
Re: Best Midsize Car [moparbad] by robertsmx
Oct 24, 2007 (11:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: moparbad (Oct 24, 2007 11:11 am)

I stand corrected. Some of the links to dependability won't respond so I clicked on "rankings by segment" and selected midsize, but didn't realize it was talking IQS.
 
Speaking of Buick, I think it benefits from the segment it caters to. I would also be interested to see average age of the buyers taking the surveys as well as miles driven to draw proper conclusions from any of these surveys. I have known folks who drive 5K miles or less/year. I drive that distance in two months.
#6701 of 13224
Re: Most Wanted Re: the meaning of zoom-zoom [imidazol97] by robertsmx
Oct 24, 2007 (11:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: imidazol97 (Oct 24, 2007 11:49 am)

Yeah, while "defending" a car that I can't see myself buying.
#6702 of 13224
Re: Most Wanted Re: the meaning of zoom-zoom [jeffyscott] by robertsmx
Oct 24, 2007 (12:22 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jeffyscott (Oct 24, 2007 11:12 am)

I mentioned Focus after Civic, and neither was to talk about size but to discuss approach automakers take. Obviously, you missed the point completely.
 
But in the process, you did mention something that relates to the topic. I have seen several people complain about Camry being favored by CR as they recommend even the new model by default. That doesn’t seem to be an issue with Focus being recommended when it first came out. So I say, let recommendation be what it is. CR has as much a crystal ball as did Ms Cleo.
 
We could discuss pricing elsewhere, but since you brought it up, Focus is really priced above Fit and comparable to Civic. Equip base with ABS, automatic transmission, and you’re into $16.5K mark (Fit is about $2K cheaper). But market isn’t willing to pay the price for it, and incentives/rebates are almost warranted. Could have been better, if Ford actually took care of its business properly when it was launched (which was quite a splash, actually). If they didn’t learn from it, Fusion’s future won’t be any different. As of now, it does look promising.
#6703 of 13224
Re: Most Wanted Re: the meaning of zoom-zoom [aviboy97] by robertsmx
Oct 24, 2007 (12:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: aviboy97 (Oct 24, 2007 11:31 am)

While I quoted JD power and do look at CR ratings, I only take them for what they are. New buyers may not buy into Camry's reputation based on that, but for repeat buyers (or buyers with history based on experiencence from friends and family) those numbers don't tell the story.
 
I started with a used 1982 Supra-Celica. It held up well, virtually guaranteeing my next purchased to be a Toyota. I bought used 1988 Corolla GT-S coupe. It held up extremely well, sold at 138K miles and was still running around 168K miles with the guy who bought from me. And it was not only reliable, it was also a fun car to drive and a lot more stable at speed than the sedan.
 
This led to yet another used Toyota, 1992 Camry which I had until I decided to go Honda. Major reason for my switch was my driving experience, not ownership experience. The ownership experience led to me picking a Honda over VW (Passat), however. From one brand with reputation to another. Since then, I've been a Honda guy, not just based on reputation of the company but based in experience.
 
This is how companies begin to garner respect, build a customer base, and repeat buyers. My cars over last ten years:
1998 Accord (current, 183K miles)
1999 Prelude (sold for Civic)
2000 Civic (replaced by TL)
2006 TL (current, 30K miles)
 
Under consideration (to replace the Accord if there is a need):
2008/2009 Accord
2009 Fit
 
It doesn't matter what JD Power or CR put on the survey. Those are simply fun numbers for me to look at. I don't put greater value on them over my ownership experience.
#6705 of 13224
Re: Most Wanted Re: the meaning of zoom-zoom [robertsmx] by aviboy97
Oct 24, 2007 (1:05 pm)
Reply

Replying to: robertsmx (Oct 24, 2007 12:31 pm)

It doesn't matter what JD Power or CR put on the survey. Those are simply fun numbers for me to look at. I don't put greater value on them over my ownership experience
 
That is the way I think of it too.
#6706 of 13224
Re: JD Powers study and data [georgia400] by moparbad
Oct 24, 2007 (1:28 pm)
Reply

JD Power ratings are such a weak way to assess a car.
 
What is a better source of reliability information than JD Power?
 
Consumer Reports only survey's subscribers and is certainly not preferred to JD Power.
#6707 of 13224
Re: JD Powers study and data [moparbad] by kdshapiro
Oct 24, 2007 (1:42 pm)
Reply

Replying to: moparbad (Oct 24, 2007 1:28 pm)

"What is a better source of reliability information than JD Power?"
 
While I'm sure the JD Power bible is the final purchase arbiter of a car decision for posters in the glass house, I've actually to meet anybody in real life who consulted with JD Power before buying a vehicle. What people do in this glass house vs the real world are two different things.
#6708 of 13224
Re: JD Powers study and data [moparbad] by aviboy97
Oct 24, 2007 (1:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: moparbad (Oct 24, 2007 1:28 pm)

Consumer Reports only survey's subscribers and is certainly not preferred to JD Power.
 
I have found long term reliability ratings from CR to be more accurate. JD only goes three years out, and are a random surveys. I have never received a JD survey.
#6709 of 13224
Re: JD Powers study and data [moparbad] by robertsmx
Oct 24, 2007 (1:57 pm)
Reply

Replying to: moparbad (Oct 24, 2007 1:28 pm)

CR or JD Powers' usability goes only as far as TV commercials, and hold as much value as NHTSA's safety star rating (which don't hold much meaning until one actually digs deeper into the claims).
 
For that matter, if you look at dependability survey, Mercury Sable has 5/5 overall dependability rating but its virtual twin has only 3/5. Why does this happen? You can see something similar in compact car segment too. Cavalier and Sunfire were virtual twins, yet the Chevrolet is deemed more dependable.

Messages Page 671 of 1323
1
...
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
...
1323
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement