Sign In Join 



Midsize Sedans 2.0

13232 messages,  Last post on Nov 26, 2009 at 10:26 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Sonata, Toyota Camry, Honda Accord, Nissan Altima, Volkswagen Passat, Mazda MAZDA6, Ford Fusion, Chevrolet Malibu, Saturn Aura, Car Comparisons, Sedan


Messages Page 6 of 1324
1
...
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
1324
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#51 of 13232
Re: 2008 Mazda6 [elroy5] by bhmr59
Apr 15, 2007 (7:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: elroy5 (Apr 15, 2007 7:03 pm)

I remember that you are very big on Honda and down on the Sonata. Have you driven an '07 Sonata? It seems to have everything you want in a car and more.
 
If you haven't tried it, you might be very pleasantly surprized. My brother got a new Sonata the end of Feb. He was amazed at the stability control and traction control on two different snowy days. He wasn't sure what was happening, at first, just that the car did what he was intending it to do.
#52 of 13232
Re: 2008 Mazda6 [bhmr59] by elroy5
Apr 15, 2007 (7:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bhmr59 (Apr 15, 2007 7:11 pm)

No, I have not driven a Sonata. I have driven Camrys, and from what I've heard the Sonata is patterned after the Camry, and has many of the same dynamics. I have driven a new Optima (don't know how similar they are), and was not impressed with the driver's seat (or much else). It reminded me of the thinly padded seat in my old Nissan Sentra work car. Honda has a reputation that I trust. I could spend my $$$ on it, knowing I would be satisfied. Hyundai is something I would be taking a chance on, and I am not a risk taker. As far as the snow thing, in south Louisiana we may get snow once every 20 years (I am 44 years old, and have seen snow here twice, and maybe an inch or two).
#53 of 13232
... by plekto
Apr 15, 2007 (10:40 pm)
Reply
Of course the Buick LaCrosse qualifies. It certainly isn't a luxury car, and GM placed it as the replacement for the Regal. Cost-wise, it's right where the Accord and others are as well.
 
Small car? No. Large? Not really. Luxury? Nope. Sporty? Gotta be kidding. That basically leaves 20-30K family sedan, which is what this group seems to be about.
#54 of 13232
Re: 2008 Mazda6 [backy] by punkr77
Apr 15, 2007 (11:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: backy (Apr 14, 2007 7:43 pm)

One thing that drops the Maxima off my shopping list (but won't matter to 95% of buyers) is no manual tranny option. The Altima can be had with a manual.
#55 of 13232
Re: 2008 Mazda6 [punkr77] by backy
Apr 16, 2007 (4:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: punkr77 (Apr 15, 2007 11:17 pm)

Good point. Another way Nissan differentiates between the Altima and Maxima.
#56 of 13232
Re: 2008 Mazda6 [elroy5] by lilengineerboy
Apr 16, 2007 (5:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: elroy5 (Apr 15, 2007 4:42 pm)

Elroy,
Autocross is typically a "course" configured with a bunch of traffic cones in a parking lot. Emphasis is much more on driver skill and car control than overall top speed, as cars rarely get above 2nd gear.
HPDE stands for high performance driving event, which used to be called "hot lapping days" at local road courses. In California, this means Willow Springs (and 'Streets), Buttonwillow, Laguna Seca, Sears Point, etc.
The Contour with slightly upgraded brakes and R-compound tires was amazingly competitive in its class. Incidentally, the early 90s Accords do well in autocross type events, especially with a warmed over suspension.
Anything off road will have a very different suspension, there might be some confusion between rally-cross (auto-cross in the mud) or true rally stage races and the on-pavement events.
That said, stock road going versions of the WRX/STI and EVO (the Subie and Mitsu) are very popular at these events beginning in the late 90s when the Civic and Sentra started to lose their sport compact following.
Like I said earlier, if BMW can have the ride/handling balance they had in 1992/3, why can't other automakers figure out how to do that now?
#57 of 13232
Re: 2008 Mazda6 [lilengineerboy] by jeffyscott
Apr 16, 2007 (6:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: lilengineerboy (Apr 16, 2007 5:49 am)

Like I said earlier, if BMW can have the ride/handling balance they had in 1992/3, why can't other automakers figure out how to do that now?
 
Their job is not to figure that out. Their job is to build cars that consumers want to buy. When the top 3 selling vehicles (in 2006) are F-150, Siverado, and Camry and the top 8 include another truck, Corolla, and Impala...this does not lead one to believe that consumers are looking for BMW-like vehicles, does it?
#58 of 13232
Re: 2008 Mazda6 [jeffyscott] by lilengineerboy
Apr 16, 2007 (6:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: jeffyscott (Apr 16, 2007 6:26 am)

Their job is to build cars that consumers want to buy.
 
This is an interesting use of the word "want." I think their task is to make vehicles people feel they "need." I don't want a new CamCord particularly, I want something fun to drive that can go around corners well and doesn't physically beat me up on the freeway. I need a car with 4 doors, 5 seatbelts, and 3 pedals (well, okay the 3 pedals is a want, but I won't buy an auto).
 
Also, I would argue that their job isn't to make cars people want, rather their job, especially to their shareholders, is to be profitable. BMW seems to be able to do that with a very low volume.
#59 of 13232
Re: 2008 Mazda6 [lilengineerboy] by jeffyscott
Apr 16, 2007 (7:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: lilengineerboy (Apr 16, 2007 6:54 am)

I guess I have to be more careful about closing those loopholes . Let me put it this way...their job is to build cars that people will buy at a price that generates a profit.
 
Is BMW low volume in Europe?
 
Toyota seems to be very profitable at high volume and has the biggest selling mid-size car, despite the fact that you (or I) will not buy one.
#60 of 13232
Re: 2008 Mazda6 [jeffyscott] by thegraduate
Apr 16, 2007 (8:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: jeffyscott (Apr 16, 2007 7:51 am)

Toyota seems to be very profitable at high volume and has the biggest selling mid-size car, despite the fact that you (or I) will not buy one.
 
This is likely due to the fact that Toyota doesn't try to sell "clearance rack" vehicles, which many automakers have been guilty of, less so recently. They build (arguably maybe, lately) high-quality cars for the most part, and don't have to sell them at major discounts. People like high-quality, and apparently are willing to pay a little more for it. I imagine when Honda comes out with is new Accord, prices will be right back at sticker (as opposed to right now where people are getting real steals of $1,000-$1,500 below invoice since the current Accord is in its last few months of life). Honda also builds high(er) quality vehicles than much of its competition, and people are willing to pay more for it (and when the higher sale price outweighs the higher build price due to better quality, more profit is had).

Messages Page 6 of 1324
1
...
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
1324
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement