Sign In Join 



Midsize Sedans 2.0

13336 messages,  Last post on Dec 05, 2009 at 4:32 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Sonata, Toyota Camry, Honda Accord, Nissan Altima, Volkswagen Passat, Mazda MAZDA6, Ford Fusion, Chevrolet Malibu, Saturn Aura, Car Comparisons, Sedan


Messages Page 352 of 1335
1
...
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
...
1335
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#3502 of 13336
Re: The problem with the Saturn... [mfletou1] by benderofbows
Jul 19, 2007 (7:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: mfletou1 (Jul 19, 2007 7:14 am)

Oh no, please not the Fusion Challenge again...
 
I agree it was flawed, but we've beat it to death already.
#3503 of 13336
Re: The problem with the Saturn... [akirby] by tjc78
Jul 19, 2007 (7:23 am)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Jul 19, 2007 4:49 am)

"It's not 1996 anymore and there is no comparison between a 96 Taurus and a 06 Fusion from a reliability standpoint"
 
It's the same 3.0 V6 isn't it?
#3504 of 13336
Re: The problem with the Saturn... [tjc78] by akirby
Jul 19, 2007 (7:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: tjc78 (Jul 19, 2007 7:23 am)

No, it's not the same 3.0 V6. The block may be the same but that's about it.
#3505 of 13336
Re: The problem with the Saturn... [mfletou1] by akirby
Jul 19, 2007 (7:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: mfletou1 (Jul 19, 2007 7:14 am)

a loaded Fusion to a stripped 4 cyl Camry and Accord and then claim that the Fusion "wins." Yeah, no kidding.
 
I'm only going to point out that the test was between fully loaded top of the line V6 models, not stripped 4 cylinders. The Accord and Camry had stability control while the Fusion had AWD for the same price. That was the only difference.
#3506 of 13336
Re: The problem with the Saturn... [akirby] by tjc78
Jul 19, 2007 (7:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Jul 19, 2007 7:34 am)

I know its petty but the only difference I know of, is that it now uses VVT to bump up the HP a little. Anyway, I do see your original point. However, (IMO) the reason the Fusion is doing well reliability wise has a lot to do with the kinks being worked out of that powertrain over the last 10 years. Kind of like the GM vehicles using the 3.8
#3507 of 13336
Re: The problem with the Saturn... [tjc78] by akirby
Jul 19, 2007 (7:58 am)
Reply

Replying to: tjc78 (Jul 19, 2007 7:48 am)

But with VVT comes totally new heads, new intake, new PCM, etc. It's actually an updated version of the 3.0L that debuted on the 2000 Lincoln LS and Jag Stype which is when the VCT was added. And don't forget there was an OHV 3.0L Vulcan engine in the Taurus back in 1996 also.
#3508 of 13336
Re: The problem with the Saturn... [tjc78] by urnews
Jul 19, 2007 (9:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: tjc78 (Jul 19, 2007 7:48 am)

However, (IMO) the reason the Fusion is doing well reliability wise has a lot to do with the kinks being worked out of that powertrain over the last 10 years.
 
I consider that to be a positive, not a negative.
#3509 of 13336
Re: The problem with the Saturn... [akirby] by benderofbows
Jul 19, 2007 (9:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Jul 19, 2007 7:34 am)

From Wikipedia:
 
"Ford Motor Company's modern 2.5 L and 3.0 L V6 automobile engines are evolutions of the same design, first used in the 1994 Ford Mondeo. This line is sold under the brand name "Duratec", as are many other engines.
 
The Mondeo V6 is a modern aluminum DOHC V6 with a 60° bank angle. The primary engineering input came from Porsche, who were developing a similar V6 before selling the engineering to Ford, and Cosworth, who helped with cylinder head manufacturing. The Jaguar AJ-V6 engine is similar but adds variable valve timing. Mazda's AJ version also has this feature."
 
Duratec 30
 
"The 3.0 L Duratec 30 or Mazda AJ was introduced in 1996 as a replacement for the 232 in³ (3.8 L) Essex V6 in the Taurus/Sable. It has 2967 cc of displacement and produces between 200 and 240 hp (150 and 180 kW). The same basic engine is used in the Jaguar S-Type, Lincoln LS, Mazda MPV, Mazda6, Mondeo ST220 and many other Ford vehicles. It is essentially a bored-out (to 89 mm) Duratec 25 and is built in Ford Motor Company's Cleveland, OH #2 plant. A slightly modified version for the Ford Five Hundred entered production at the Cleveland, OH #1 plant in 2004.
 
There are two key versions of the Duratec 30:
 
DAMB - The Lincoln LS and Jaguar AJ30 versions have direct-acting mechanical bucket (DAMB) tappets. Output is 232 hp (173 kW) at 6750 RPM with 220 ft·lbf (298 N·m) of torque at 4500 rpm.
 
RFF - The Taurus/Sable/Escape version uses roller finger followers (RFF) instead and produces 201 hp (150 kW) at 5900 RPM with 207 ft·lbf (281 N·m) of torque at 4400 rpm.
  
The 2006 Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan, and Lincoln Zephyr feature a version of the Duratec 30 utilizing variable valve timing. The engine has an output of 221 hp (165 kW) at 6250 rpm, and 205 ft·lbf (278 N·m) of torque at 4800 rpm.
 
A Twin-turbocharged version of this engine is used in the Noble M400, a British supercar. The engine is rebuilt and tuned to a max power of 425 bhp 6500 rpm, with a torque figure of 390 ft·lbf 5000 rpm. Noble has used forged pistons, an oil cooler, a larger baffled oil sump and extra cooling ducts to maintain its durability.
 
Mazda's MZI version adds variable valve timing, as does Jaguar's AJ30. Note that the MZI name is also used in Europe on Mazda's version of the Ford Sigma I4. The 3.0 L, 226 hp V6 used in the Mondeo ST220 is called Duratec ST. The 3.0 L, 204 hp V6 in the Mondeo Titanium is called Duratec SE."
 
#3510 of 13336
Re: The problem with the Saturn... [akirby] by captain2
Jul 19, 2007 (9:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Jul 18, 2007 6:03 pm)

Not to mention all the 2005 Toyota recalls
What recalls would those be? Don't think they actually recalled even the sludging problem they had on the previous generation of V6s. Recalls, in fact, tend to be related to safety issues. There has been a whole 1 recall on my 05 Avalon TMK (a steering column weld) and a coupla of non-safety related TSBs (Tranny programming and a timing chain cover leak). The car is actually doing better (after over 50k) that I would have anticipated being a completely new car with, at that time, an unproven drivetrain. Broke a cardinal rule (never buy a truly new model its first year), and only something that I would've even considered with a Toyota/Honda/Nissan product. So far so good. The same thing with a GM/Ford/Chrysler product? No way, I'll continue to trust a long established history!
#3511 of 13336
Re: The problem with the Saturn... [urnews] by tjc78
Jul 19, 2007 (9:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: urnews (Jul 19, 2007 9:39 am)

"I consider that to be a positive, not a negative"
 
Depends how you look at it. On one hand you use an old powertrain to make your "new" vehicle reliable during its launch. On the other hand you end up with a vehicle that has 50 less HP, less refinement (IMO) and gets the same or worse FE compared to the competition.

Messages Page 352 of 1335
1
...
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
...
1335
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement