You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Midsize Sedans 2.0

13244 messages, Last post on Nov 27, 2009 at 11:50 PM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: m1miata (Jul 17, 2007 9:57 pm) Price never entered into the equation. I don't shop on price - I buy whatever I like and try to get the best price on that. I'm too picky about styling and features. Before the Fusion debuted I had decided to get an Accord. But the Fusion had the looks and features I wanted and it had a unique Piano Black interior trim and unique Tungsten grey paint that I still think looks fantastic. Would I have bought it if it was the same price as the Accord? Sorry to disprove your theory but the answer is yes. If you think that people only buy Fusions and Milans because they are cheaper you're mistaken. People who want cheap would be buying Kias. |
|
|
Replying to: tjc78 (Jul 18, 2007 3:37 am) True, but it is a good bit cheaper to buy than a loaded Camry or Accord V6 which would give us an apples to apples comparison then.
|
|
|
Replying to: baggs32 (Jul 18, 2007 4:40 am) That is exactly my point. If it wasn't cheaper to buy it wouldn't be doing nearly as well, because of it's shortcomings. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: akirby (Jul 17, 2007 9:28 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: akirby (Jul 17, 2007 6:59 pm) a condition that the 'American' manufacturers have 'taught' the American carbuyer - if they are going to shop those brands, they EXPECT larger rebates (and other incentives) as you say - something that Buick, for example, specializes in - overpricing a car with those 'built-in' rebates. The Camcord shopper, OTH, is doing well to get close to invoice (except possibly on EOY model changes). And then we wonder why those 'Detroit' brands don't hold their resale values that well, so much so that even the steep discounts can't make them cheaper to own than those Camcords they 'compete' with. And part of the reason why Ford/GM/Chrysler are losing money faster than it can be printed? Wouldn't it be nice for those same mfgrs. if they made a car that was good enough and/or in demand (the two kinda go together) enough that MSRP and invoice meant something? |
|
|
Replying to: captain2 (Jul 18, 2007 5:33 am) |
|
|
Replying to: lightfootfl (Jul 18, 2007 5:29 am) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: captain2 (Jul 18, 2007 5:33 am) Actually my fleet safety weekly email had a blurb about how the costs in the rental car industry are skyrocketing because there is no longer the dumping vehicles to fleet sales there has been in the past. Other than a cost increase for rentals, I don't see this adversely affecting the overall market so much. They also had a blurb about how GM and Ford residuals percentages increased by double digits in the last year, crediting the Fulan/Edge. |
|
|
Replying to: mz6greyghost (Jul 18, 2007 4:02 am) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: mz6greyghost (Jul 18, 2007 4:02 am) I didn't even look at these when I bought my Accord in February, because I knew I'd want one! The Accord was also on my short list and since they were all marked $300 under invoice at the local dealer, and the Altimas were brand new and selling for MSRP, the deal made the final choice for me. RE: the Milan... you stated: "The 5-speed is pretty smooth to operate, but the car should either have a 6th gear or the gearing revised, because it revs higher than the 2.5S 6-speed at highway velocities, and I'm sure it affects both the NVH and fuel economy." When I drove the Fusion 5-speed I never got to highway speeds, what RPM was it running? At 80 MPH my Accord is spinning 3,000. I't doesn't bother me because NVH isn't an issue, and my old 626 V6 used to spin 4,000 at the same speed (7k redline). What RPM does the Nissan 2.5 6-speed turn in 6th?
|
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2011 Hyundai Sonata
2010 Toyota Camry
2010 Honda Accord
2010 Nissan Altima
2010 Volkswagen Passat
2010 Mazda MAZDA6
2010 Ford Fusion
2010 Chevrolet Malibu
2009 Saturn Aura



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats