Ask the Car People.SM


Midsize Sedans 2.0

18437 messages,  Last post on Jun 19, 2013 at 6:38 AM

You are in the Sedans Forum.

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Sonata, Toyota Camry, Honda Accord, Nissan Altima, Volkswagen Passat, Mazda MAZDA6, Ford Fusion, Chevrolet Malibu, Kia Optima, Car Comparisons, Sedan

Messages Page 1745 of 1844

#17441 of 18437 Re: In the Market [tundradweller1] by cski

Feb 02, 2013 (10:23 am)

Replying to: tundradweller1 (Feb 02, 2013 7:27 am)
I just saw a review of the 2014 Mazda 6. I really like the 2.2 liter TD with 310 torques!!! 310!!! From a 2.2!!
 
Now that's more like it Mazda. Also, the new interior is awesome looking. The flat screen is integrated nicely and Automobile magazine raved about the seats. They look comfy in the pictures. YES I AM SAYING NICE THINGS ABOUT THE 6 BACKY!!!
 
Lastly, I can't get with the silly grin front end. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder I guess.

#17442 of 18437 Re: In the Market [benjaminh] by cski

Feb 02, 2013 (10:46 am)

Replying to: benjaminh (Feb 02, 2013 7:12 am)
"Several midsize cars have poor rear visibility, including, I think, Fusion, Optima, Sonata, Passat, Malibu, and Altima"
 
So pretty much all mid-size sedans have poor rear visibility!

#17443 of 18437 Re: In the Market [cski] by m6user

Feb 02, 2013 (10:50 am)

Replying to: cski (Feb 02, 2013 10:23 am)
Doesn't have the "silly grin" anymore. It was the Mazda3 that got all the hate for the grin as the 2 gen 6 didn't really have it as much. The new 2014 doesn't have the grin at all. Below is a quote from Augo Guide review which most other reviewers have agreed with.
 
NEW BODY STYLE SWAPS SMILE FOR SERIOUS FACE
  
It wears the second production application of Mazda’s new KODO design language, losing the smiling front end and exclamatory headlights for a more pronounced grille and sharper body style.

#17444 of 18437 2012 Optima EX. by cski

Feb 02, 2013 (11:06 am)


 
Test

#17445 of 18437 Re: Jan. midsize sales [cski] by benjaminh

Feb 02, 2013 (11:20 am)

Replying to: cski (Feb 02, 2013 10:13 am)
cski wrote:
 
"...I think the Passat looks fine; but you really have to lux-it-up to match the levels of equipment in some competitors. Why would I buy a 5 cyl engine with 30 horsepower and 15 torque's less than a four? MPG of 22/32 is ok, but that 5th cylinder is costing you at least 4 mpg hwy and 2-4 city based on competition. Also, it costs 26,800 for the Automatic. vs 20-24 for competitors. a 5 speed manual is std on the SE. (where is the other gear?? all competitors who offer a manual trans have 6 speeds)..."
 
Agree with all of this. The Passat is a nice looking car. And I think VW has significantly improved quality and reliability. But to cut costs they cut some things that are now making them less competitive. I read somewhere that for the 2014 model year the Passat is going to have a more advanced engine, and maybe they'll get a 6 speed manual with that.
 
For now, however, VW is blowing them out the door with 0% financing for 66 (!) months. Good deal on a good car!
 
http://www.vw.com/en/models/passat/gallery.html

#17446 of 18437 Optima by benjaminh

Feb 02, 2013 (11:24 am)

KIA has some great deals on the Optima too.... 0.9% for 36 months, or $199 lease, or $2000 bonus rebate if you own a competing car!
 
http://www.kia.com/#/optima/offers

#17447 of 18437 Re: In the Market [cski] by tundradweller1

Feb 02, 2013 (4:33 pm)

Replying to: cski (Feb 02, 2013 10:23 am)
Not to correct you but the new Mazda 6 has a 2.5 liter. If you can find a dealership with one test, drive it. The gal that went with me encouraged me to stuff it into corners and rocket out of them. I was pleasently surprised. Being a Motorcycle nut I am ready for a fun car to drive. Now just waiting for some current magazine road tests. If the new 6 truly returns near 38 mpg it's a lock.
Also regarding the 2.5 - 5 cyl. Passat, they have been making that motor since 2005. No wonder it does not measure up in performance and economy.

#17448 of 18437 the 2.5 doesn't deserve the critical comparo remarks it seems to be getting by gimmestdtranny

Feb 02, 2013 (5:14 pm)

Yes, it is not the as fuel efficient as some of its so-called 4 cyl competitors, but they do not have the smoothness (perhaps Honda's effort is close) and I doubt any of those higher hp/torque 4 cyl efforts from....Korea..as an example, feel as strong off the line. And I absolutely assure you NONE of the 4 cyl ones have as rewarding an exhaust note. And let's get some miles on those DI 4's before we further condemn that 5 cyl and its longevity/$ investment potential.
 As for FE being your primary beef..ya gotta pay to play/enjoy..

#17449 of 18437 In the market by tundradweller1

Feb 02, 2013 (5:53 pm)

VW 2.5 - 170HP 177 ft. lb. torque - 0 to 60 9 seconds - fuel economy 22/31
 
Mazda 2.5 - 189 HP 189 ft. lb. torque - 0 to 60 7.6 seconds - fuel economy 26/38
 
It may "feel stong" off the line but the numbers tell a different story. Already reading about VW dumping the 5cyl. for 4cyl. for next year.
Cheers

#17450 of 18437 Bye Bye 5 cylinder VW engine by pegasus17

Feb 02, 2013 (10:33 pm)

Replying to: tundradweller1 (Feb 02, 2013 5:53 pm)
Not a bad engine, just outdated and outperformed by newer higher tech engines. Sort of like Windows Vista (i used it for many years without any major problems) compared to Win 7.
If they were changing the engine this year, the Passat would still be on my shopping list. Can't wait for the 2014 model this fall; my lease is up in 2 months

Messages Page 1745 of 1844

To POST a message, please Sign In.

Advertisement

Browse by Category

Browse by Vehicle
   View All Vehicles

Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
View All Topics

Edmunds Community

Advertisement