Ask the Car People.SM


Midsize Sedans 2.0

18212 messages,  Last post on May 23, 2013 at 9:43 AM

You are in the Sedans Forum.

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Sonata, Toyota Camry, Honda Accord, Nissan Altima, Volkswagen Passat, Mazda MAZDA6, Ford Fusion, Chevrolet Malibu, Kia Optima, Car Comparisons, Sedan

Messages Page 1744 of 1822

#17430 of 18212 Re: Actual 2013 Nissan Altima CVT video..... [pegasus17] by backy

Jan 29, 2013 (4:49 pm)

Replying to: pegasus17 (Jan 29, 2013 4:01 pm)
Odd on the Altima numbers... CR got some great FE numbers on the Altima 2.5, especially on the highway where they got well over 40 mpg in their tests. Someone who's only getting 18 mpg must be doing a lot of in-town, short-distance driving.
 
I know it's not a true mid-sized sedan (for those people tracking such things here), but my Sentra--which has a mid-sized interior at least--with the CVT has done very well in real-world driving over 3 years, exceeding its EPA numbers. But that's MY real-world driving, and I drive with a light foot and have learned to milk that CVT for all it's got. Not everyone will be able to drive that way, or want to.

#17431 of 18212 mileage by pegasus17

Jan 29, 2013 (5:49 pm)

Replying to: backy (Jan 29, 2013 4:49 pm)
for Backy:
What an intelligent statement you've made in the past:
"What a huge difference speed makes for fuel economy! Something for folks to consider when they don't see their Optimas or (Sonatas) hitting the EPA fuel economy numbers on the highway, but tend to drive at 70+ mph."
 
Something to check on your wife's Sonata:
FWIW, in my 2011 Sonata, the speedo reads 2 mph high. example: I have to drive an indicated 62mph to attain 60mph. At lower speeds, it still reads high. Confirmed with GPS, local radar, a pace car, and a few middle fingers for driving too slow.

#17432 of 18212 Re: mileage [pegasus17] by backy

Jan 29, 2013 (6:27 pm)

Replying to: pegasus17 (Jan 29, 2013 5:49 pm)
Yeah, if I ever get the thing on a highway for more than a couple of miles, I'll check it.
 
Of course speed affects fuel economy. Everyone knows that (or should know it). But I still think a car rated 35 mpg highway should be able to get better than 31 mpg cruising at 70... recall I said CRUISING. If you're kinda/sorta going 70 but passing vehicles, accelerating/decelerating/braking, some non-freeway mixed in... all bets are off!

#17433 of 18212 In the Market by tundradweller1

Feb 01, 2013 (11:51 am)

Have been shopping and test driving a few mid-sizer's:
The 2014 Mazda 6 sport was a hoot to drive, the four almost has the torque of a V-6. Rather noisy on the highway (it was windy) and the sight lines are not great, small mirrors too.Still felt more like a sports car than a sedan, though you do feel every road irregularity.
The 2013 Accord LX 4 cyl. - still looks like a grocery getter compared to most others.
decent motor, handling was surprisingly sporty, CVT a little weird though much better than the Nissan Altima which I will avoid due to CVT issues and power steering whine with no dealer fixes.
Ford Fusion, after all the issues with the first gen fusion transmissions and no fixes I'll pass. Recent recalls cropping up too.
The wife has a 2011 Sonata 2.0 T - back to the dealership numerous times for front end pull (common) they FINALLY replaced both struts. Paint chipping off, partial re-painting etc. etc. Avoiding KIA/ Hyundai for now.
Chevy, not even a consideration.
The Passat, dated, under powered and worst MPG. High long term costs.
The trend for car makers is to cram all the gee wiz gadgets into the vehicle. Trouble is what good is it if the drive train and peripherals are junk? I don't get it. Maybe I'm not a marketing guy, I just want them to work...for 200,000 miles.

#17434 of 18212 Re: In the Market [tundradweller1] by aviboy97

Feb 01, 2013 (8:30 pm)

Replying to: tundradweller1 (Feb 01, 2013 11:51 am)
The trend for car makers is to cram all the gee wiz gadgets into the vehicle. Trouble is what good is it if the drive train and peripherals are junk? I don't get it. Maybe I'm not a marketing guy, I just want them to work...for 200,000 miles.
 
Sounds like the Toyota Camry is right up your alley.

#17435 of 18212 Jan. midsize sales by benjaminh

Feb 02, 2013 (6:17 am)

Thanks to TSX at www.vtec.net for these numbers:
Camry 31,897 +8.2%
Accord 23,924 +68.1%; PHEV 2
Fusion 22,399 +64.5%
Altima 21,464 -4%
Malibu 15,823 +7.8%
Sonata 13,247
Optima 11,252
Avenger 9,628 +69%
Passat 8,856 +40.2%
200 8,846 +26%
 
The Camry continue to dominate, which is a slight surprise given that Camry was just rated Poor in the IIHS crash test:
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByPAhoeU6UQ
 
But, the Camry offers a lot of bang for the buck, low financing, and the Toyota name. Also it seems like the other auto makers have been too nice to make an ad out of that video.

#17436 of 18212 Re: Jan. midsize sales [benjaminh] by romil01

Feb 02, 2013 (6:21 am)

Replying to: benjaminh (Feb 02, 2013 6:17 am)
The Camry continue to dominate, which is a slight surprise given that Camry was just rated Poor in the IIHS crash test:
 
The average consumer is incredibly ignorant and probably has no clue that the Camry performed poorly in this test. I think most Camry purchasers must blindly buy that car without any comparison testing. I don't think too many people in their right mind would actually choose a Camry over some of the newer offerings from competitors.

#17437 of 18212 midsize sales by benjaminh

Feb 02, 2013 (6:26 am)

Huge surge by Fusion in January. Honda may have to start protecting Accord's number 2 spot soon. So far Honda hasn't offered any financing on the 2013 Accord, but maybe that will change soon. The Altima is selling well, but seems to be faltering a little given that it's an all-new design. Passat is selling well too, but I think the VW factory in TN can make c. 12,000 Passats a month, and so they aren't selling them quite as fast as they're making them.

#17438 of 18212 Re: In the Market [tundradweller1] by benjaminh

Feb 02, 2013 (7:12 am)

Replying to: tundradweller1 (Feb 01, 2013 11:51 am)
tundradweller:
 
Thanks for your observations. Can you clarify a little what you mean about that the "sight lines are not great" on the Mazda6? I thought visibility would be pretty good in that car.
 
Several midsize cars have poor rear visibility, including, I think, Fusion, Optima, Sonata, Passat, Malibu, and Altima.
 
The best visibility is found in the Accord, and that's one of the hallmarks of Honda's designs: Form follows function. Some people say it's not exciting enough, but it works better than some competing designs for providing rear headroom and good visibility. You also can roll down your rear windows on an Accord almost all the way. Try that on the others. Can't do that on any of these others, I don't think, except the Camry and Mazda6.
 
My guess is that all of these cars will have very long lasting engines and transmissions. Probably all of them are designed to make it to 200k as long as all maintenance is done as scheduled and they are not used roughly. Will they all make it to 200k? Hard to say. Hyundai, Kia, and Honda now have direct injected engines, and I don't think many have yet gone more than 100k to test whether long term they have issues. In durability tests Ford's turbo DI engines seem to do very well. Ford engineers have strengthened several parts to make these engines pretty tough, and I'm sure all the others have too. Honda's CVT is new, but they've been building these for a while, and have apparently done a lot of engineering to design in long term durability. But with any new design there can be question marks. Anyway, I think we are all probably fairly safe for durability of engines and transmissions with all of these.
 
I'm sure you've thought of this already, but if you want fewer gadgets buy a base model—you'll save money now, and potentially trouble in the years ahead.
 
Even the base models of all of these cars are pretty lavishly equipped compared to midsize cars of 10 years ago.
 
Hope you'll let us know what you pick!

#17439 of 18212 In the Market by tundradweller1

Feb 02, 2013 (7:27 am)

Granted the Mazda 6 has a smaller blind spot then the Sonata and yes the Accord so far has the best visibility. Chalk it up to the higher waist line, swooping roof designs of late.
Considering I'm driving a 2004 Taurus SE that's approaching 200,000 miles, maybe color my opinions old school
The Gadgets I don't mind and in fact embrace them (I'm rather digital for my age) I really like the touch screen on the 6. My comment was geared more toward manufacturers than my preferences. The safety features on the horizon look promising, some may even save the increasingly distracted from impending doom.
 I didn't mention Toyota because I just am not interested in the most recalled brand in spite of their huge sales numbers. I agree that some people just buy them because they are so popular. Ironic as they rarely make the top 10 in various car magazine reviews.
These are heady times for car buyers. More competition, more options for the same money, better performance while returning improved mileage and safer vehicles. This is going to be fun!

Messages Page 1744 of 1822

To POST a message, please Sign In.

Advertisement

Browse by Category

Browse by Vehicle
   View All Vehicles

Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
View All Topics

Edmunds Community

Advertisement