Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Midsize Sedans 2.0
13142 messages, Last post on Nov 08, 2009 at 7:34 PM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: bpizzuti (Jan 10, 2009 4:24 am) They're dangerous because... they'll try and remain competetive? Is Honda the "bad guy" to you? Maybe not, but your wording makes it sound that way.
|
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Jan 10, 2009 12:19 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: backy (Jan 10, 2009 10:59 am) The Fusion/Milan being undersized is not the point. The point is, it is smaller, so it should get better mileage than an Accord or 6. If you are giving up interior space, shouldn't you be rewarded, with better mileage? |
|
|
Replying to: elroy5 (Jan 10, 2009 4:37 pm) You just don't want to give Ford credit for anything, do you? |
|
|
Replying to: backy (Jan 10, 2009 4:50 pm) It's kind of illustrative of the problems the Detroit 3 face. They've made junk for so long, and have left such a bad taste in the mouths of so many customers, many DO refuse to give them credit for anything. |
|
|
Replying to: backy (Jan 10, 2009 4:50 pm)  Not a big advantage, IMO. But then I chose a V6 model, so gas mileage is not a top priority of mine.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: elroy5 (Jan 10, 2009 6:30 pm) there is enough head room and plenty leg room for me. another feature i was looking for was awd and i was willing to give up some mpg to get it. |
|
|
Replying to: elroy5 (Jan 10, 2009 4:37 pm) 1. The term "undersized" is a misnomer. Saying it has a little smaller cubic foot total than some other midsizers would be closer and even then that does not always equate to more comfort or feeling of spaciousness in a vehicle. 2. I'm sure one could find many cars smaller inside than the Fusion/Milan and that get less mpg. 3. A Corvette has less interior space....does that mean it should get better mpg? The 2010 Fusion looks like it will tie or beat many compact cars that certainly have less interior space. Maybe we should be complaining about those cars instead. 4. If you are so hung up on minute differences in interior space than maybe we should look at the percentage ratios of interior space vs. mpg to make our buying decisions. A little ridiculous don't you think?
|
|
|
Replying to: elroy5 (Jan 10, 2009 6:30 pm) Hmmm... the Accord has less interior space and also lower fuel economy than the Sonata. Actually, the Accord EX trims have less interior space than the 2010 Fulan--and also lower fuel economy. Do you think most Americans would trade both interior space and fuel economy for... what, maybe lots of push buttons on the dash? Actually, this FE/space tradeoff may be the other way around. Notice that Malibu sales are surging lately while Accord (and Camry) sales are plummeting. Could it be that buyers are gravitating towards the Malibu with its better fuel economy despite the fact it has less interior space than the Accord or Camry? |
|
|
Replying to: m6user (Jan 10, 2009 7:44 pm)
|
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2011 Hyundai Sonata
2010 Toyota Camry
2010 Honda Accord
2010 Nissan Altima
2010 Volkswagen Passat
2010 Mazda MAZDA6
2010 Ford Fusion
2010 Chevrolet Malibu
2009 Saturn Aura
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
