Sign In Join 



Midsize Sedans 2.0

13221 messages,  Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 6:41 AM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Sonata, Toyota Camry, Honda Accord, Nissan Altima, Volkswagen Passat, Mazda MAZDA6, Ford Fusion, Chevrolet Malibu, Saturn Aura, Car Comparisons, Sedan


Messages Page 1127 of 1323
1
...
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
...
1323
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#11258 of 13221
Re: EPA certifies Fusion Hybrid [explorerx4] by plekto
Jan 03, 2009 (9:00 am)
Reply

Replying to: explorerx4 (Jan 03, 2009 6:06 am)

you are not going very far in a current hybrid without any gasoline.
maybe enough to pull over to the side of the road, if you run out.
****
 
Maybe - but you're dead as well in a normal car if you run out. The differences are:
 
1 - The generator can use any number of fuels, and can be of any kind. I suggest a small turbine engine burning diesel fuel. Or that can run stuff other than petroleum based fuels. (say, already designed to run vegetable oils as well as diesel)
 
2 - vastly less weight and parts to fix. Said small engine could easily be air/heatsink cooled as well, meaning that you could eliminate 90% of the things that typically break and require fixing in a car. No coolant system(huge), plus not needing things like an alternator or transmission. Think VW Bug or Go-Kart simple. The vast majority of the vehicle is empty space as a result.
 
3 - tons cheaper to buy. Instead of a battery pack that can run 20-30 miles on its own, you have a smaller set of 2-4 batteries and some capacitors. BAttery replacement every 5-10 years is closer to $500.
 
4 - less weight (1000+ lbs lighter than a Prius) also means much quicker acceleration and less power needed to move it around. Less expensive components as well. This should save 10-20mpg right here.
 
The problem is that nobody is making one because they all worship speed instead of efficiency. I'd happily deal with a 1980s era Civic CRX sized small car with 100mpg and 0-60 times in the 10-15 second range.(same as most older cars, so traffic isn't going any quicker anyways).
#11259 of 13221
Re: C/D on hybrid mid-sized sedans [backy] by elroy5
Jan 03, 2009 (9:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: backy (Jan 03, 2009 7:22 am)

The C/D article is a good comparison, if you want a "typical" midsize sedan, that is also a hybrid. The article calls the Fusion the "most fuel efficient midsize hybrid". It fails to mention the Prius however, which should have at least been mentioned as the "exception" to the rule in this comparison. While it is not the "typical" midsize, it is classified as midsize by the EPA, and is the most cost effective hybrid by far. If you really want the most out of your hybrid, the Prius whips them all. It has the lowest price, and the highest mileage.
#11260 of 13221
Re: C/D on hybrid mid-sized sedans [elroy5] by akirby
Jan 03, 2009 (11:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: elroy5 (Jan 03, 2009 9:08 am)

The Prius is smaller, uglier by far and doesn't drive anything like a normal midsize sedan. The Fusion Hybrid is EPA rated at 45 city while the Fusion gets 41. The Fusion looks better, drives better and gets almost the same fuel economy in the city.
 
The only reason to buy a Prius is to show people that you have a hybrid, since it doesn't look like any normal midsize sedan.
#11261 of 13221
Re: C/D on hybrid mid-sized sedans [akirby] by elroy5
Jan 03, 2009 (12:19 pm)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Jan 03, 2009 11:31 am)

The Fusion looks better, drives better and gets almost the same fuel economy in the city.
 

You forgot the most important part. The Prius cost about $10k less. That's one heck of an incentive to be greener.
#11262 of 13221
Re: C/D on hybrid mid-sized sedans [elroy5] by akirby
Jan 03, 2009 (12:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: elroy5 (Jan 03, 2009 12:19 pm)

That's not the most important part to me. Styling, features and driving are more important to me than the price.
#11263 of 13221
Re: C/D on hybrid mid-sized sedans [jeffyscott] by mz6greyghost
Jan 03, 2009 (12:43 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jeffyscott (Jan 03, 2009 7:55 am)

I assume there are more differences than just the hybridness if there is a $10-12K price difference.
 
Usually, there is.
 
Hybrid models from most automakers include some of the more popular features, optional on lower models, as standard equipment. It helps to soften the price difference.
#11264 of 13221
Re: C/D on hybrid mid-sized sedans [akirby] by bpizzuti
Jan 03, 2009 (12:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Jan 03, 2009 11:31 am)

Actually, while I like the styling of the Fusion a lot, I also happen to like hatches, and wish the Fusion or Mazda3 would come in a hatch version. That's another advantage to the Prius.
#11265 of 13221
Re: C/D on hybrid mid-sized sedans [akirby] by mz6greyghost
Jan 03, 2009 (12:56 pm)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Jan 03, 2009 12:33 pm)

The Prius is smaller, uglier by far and doesn't drive anything like a normal midsize sedan. The Fusion Hybrid is EPA rated at 45 city while the Fusion gets 41. The Fusion looks better, drives better and gets almost the same fuel economy in the city.
  
The only reason to buy a Prius is to show people that you have a hybrid, since it doesn't look like any normal midsize sedan.

 
Quoted for truth!
 
Having been behind the wheel of a Prius, I can agree with everything here, especially the driving experience. To me, Toyotas are a close second to Buick in terms of putting me in a coma when behind the wheel, but the Prius is beyond pathetic. The low rolling-resistance tires squeal at every corner, WITHOUT being pushed hard, and they also contribute heavily to the numb steering, miserable braking, and the overall disconnected feeling you get.
 
I can see why tree-huggers love it, and why anyone with a soul doesn't.
 
You forgot the most important part. The Prius cost about $10k less. That's one heck of an incentive to be greener.
 
It may be $10K less on paper, but you're going to have a hard time finding ANY Prius at that base price, since they were (and in some cases, still are) going at a premium over MSRP. I've seen listing of USED examples going for higher than that.
 
That's not the most important part to me. Styling, features and driving are more important to me than the price.
 
Quoted for agreement.
 
Kudos to Ford for the excellent press and praise they've been getting for the Fusion Hybrid, which seems well-deserved.
#11266 of 13221
Re: C/D on hybrid mid-sized sedans [bpizzuti] by mz6greyghost
Jan 03, 2009 (12:58 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bpizzuti (Jan 03, 2009 12:47 pm)

Actually, while I like the styling of the Fusion a lot, I also happen to like hatches, and wish the Fusion or Mazda3 would come in a hatch version. That's another advantage to the Prius.
 
You mean the Mazda6, right?
#11267 of 13221
Re: C/D on hybrid mid-sized sedans [mz6greyghost] by backy
Jan 03, 2009 (1:42 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mz6greyghost (Jan 03, 2009 12:56 pm)

The Prius really is not $10k less than the Fulan hybrid. The Fusion hybrid starts at $28k. The Prius starts around $23k. I don't know how the equipment levels of these base versions compare, but it's at best a $5k difference. Loaded, the Prius is pretty close to if not over $30k, while the C/D Fusion tester seemed pretty loaded for $32.5k.
 
We are forgetting one thing though comparing the Prius to the Fusion hybrid. The 2010 Prius is coming very shortly (will be unveiled officially in Detroit in a week or so). It should be an evolutionary improvement over the current Prius, and is expected to offer more power and also better fuel economy than the current Prius. As for interior room and handling improvements, we'll have to see about that. But I personally consider the Prius, and even the Insight, to be competitors to the likes of the Fusion and Camry hybrids. I don't need as much interior room as those sedans provide, I prefer a hatch configuration, and the 2010 Prius at least (don't know about the Insight) should easily exceed the FE for the hybrid mid-sized sedans--as it should as it's smaller, lighter, and lower-powered. I also like the swoopy looks of the 2010 Prius and Insight better than the mid-sized hybrid sedans. And the payback proposition is better with a lower-priced hybrid like the Prius or Insight. Especially for people like me who don't drive a lot, maybe 10k max per year for my wife's vehicle, which is what I am looking at a hybrid to be a few years out, once we are done with minivans.
 
Now, if gas stays around $2 a gallon and Ford et. al. are forced to offer discounts on the mid-sized hybrid sedans to move them, e.g. a base Fusion hybrid for the low $20s, then that could be compelling. But at $28k and up? I'd probably pass. Or maybe buy a 2010 Fusion hybrid in 2012 or 2013.

Messages Page 1127 of 1323
1
...
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
...
1323
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement