Sign In Join 



Midsize Sedans 2.0

13142 messages,  Last post on Nov 08, 2009 at 7:34 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Sonata, Toyota Camry, Honda Accord, Nissan Altima, Volkswagen Passat, Mazda MAZDA6, Ford Fusion, Chevrolet Malibu, Saturn Aura, Car Comparisons, Sedan


Messages Page 1125 of 1315
1
...
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
...
1315
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#11240 of 13142
Re: EPA certifies Fusion Hybrid [elroy5] by tenpin288
Dec 30, 2008 (5:44 pm)
Reply

Replying to: elroy5 (Dec 30, 2008 4:51 pm)

elroy, this has been discussed ad nauseum in this and other forums. Ford did not infringe Toyota patents. Just like most businesses do today, Ford and Toyota entered into a cross licensing agreement to avoid any infringement problems. Here are a few comments about the agreement:
 
From wikipedia:
 
The Escape Hybrid uses technology similar to that used in Toyota's Prius. Ford engineers realized their technology may conflict with patents held by Toyota, which led to a 2004 patent-sharing accord between the companies, licensing Ford's use of some of Toyota's hybrid technology in exchange for Toyota's use of some of Ford's diesel and direct-injection engine technology.[9] Both Ford and Toyota state that Ford received no technical assistance from Toyota in developing the hybrid powertrain, but that some hybrid engine technologies developed by Ford independently were found to be similar to technologies previously patented by Toyota.

From Businessweek.com:
 
Ford Motor Company was THE FIRST auto manufacturer in the world to put a full hybrid SUV on the road.
The Ford Escape Hybrid (and now the Mercury Mariner Hybrid) was engineered, validated and is manufactured in the United States. There is NO Toyota technology or parts in our vehicle. We received NO technical support from Toyota when designing our hybrid system.
We entered into a business arrangement with Toyota where we EXCHANGED patent licences. We licensed 21 patents from Toyota because our hybrid system design was close enough in design to what Toyota did that we wanted to ensure there were no accusations of infringement. At the same time, Toyota licensed several patents from Ford for emissions technology. This was a financial transaction — one which goes on in our industry every day.

 
This is a common business practice in today's copyright-gone-mad litigious economy. Nothing underhanded there.
#11241 of 13142
Re: EPA certifies Fusion Hybrid [tenpin288] by berri
Dec 30, 2008 (6:30 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tenpin288 (Dec 30, 2008 5:44 pm)

I believe Ford may be honest on this one. There is a whole business out there using patents (many of them pretty shaky patents at that) and threatened litigation to extort money. The lawyers are once again further helping America lose its competitiveness and Congress just sits on its ass taking lobbyist payola while Americans keep losing jobs or paying inflated prices because of this nonsense. The patent is an important protection, but not when they are issued for marginal at best concepts that often build off concepts already around. This issue needs to be fixed, but it probably won't since the Bar Associations have plenty of lobbyists to help keep the over supply of attorney's employed.
#11242 of 13142
Re: EPA certifies Fusion Hybrid [tenpin288] by elroy5
Dec 30, 2008 (9:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tenpin288 (Dec 30, 2008 5:44 pm)

tenpin, I was not the one who brought this subject up.
 
We licensed 21 patents from Toyota because our hybrid system design was close enough in design to what Toyota did that we wanted to ensure there were no accusations of infringement.
 
How did these two designs become so similar? Pure coincidence?
None of the Ford guys knew anything about Toyota's hybrid system, or how it worked? And didn't use that knowledge, to help them along? Please
Actually, why would the consumer care where the hybrid technology came from? As long as the system works. The fact that Ford people are so defensive about it, says to me, they have their own doubts, as to how original Ford's system is.
#11243 of 13142
Re: EPA certifies Fusion Hybrid [berri] by bpizzuti
Dec 31, 2008 (9:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: berri (Dec 30, 2008 6:30 pm)

Toyota will probably threaten Ford with something again, for several reasons:
 
1. How dare some silly American manufacturer develop a better hybrid system than Toyota?
2. Toyota has the cash to sue, Ford can't afford to get into litigation right now
3. Toyota is jealous of the F150, and might want to reskin it and sell it as the next Tundra
 
Luckily the other Fusion models look extremely wonderful and candidates for Car of the Year from someone. I want one, and I'll take an I4 SEL if I can't get the Hybrid (I drive 90% highway anyway, paying the hybrid premium is a questionable move despite how well the Fusion Hybrid does on the highway).
#11244 of 13142
Re: EPA certifies Fusion Hybrid [akirby] by mickeyrom
Dec 31, 2008 (9:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Dec 30, 2008 11:46 am)

Well if it's not the same,it surely is similar enough to make me wonder.Nothing wrong with that,it's inevitable that there will be similarities.Heck, aren't all cars similar in many many ways?
#11245 of 13142
Re: EPA certifies Fusion Hybrid [elroy5] by akirby
Dec 31, 2008 (10:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: elroy5 (Dec 30, 2008 9:50 pm)

How did these two designs become so similar? Pure coincidence?
 
Yes, it was PURE COINCIDENCE. When two people write software that does similar functions it often turns out the same. There are only so many ways to do something. It happens ALL THE TIME - you just don't normally hear about it.
 
You (and others) just can't bear the thought that Ford did something good - on their own - and you just have to find something to detract from that.
 
Can we stop with all the conspiracy theories now?
#11246 of 13142
Re: EPA certifies Fusion Hybrid [akirby] by bpizzuti
Dec 31, 2008 (1:15 pm)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Dec 31, 2008 10:22 am)

Can we stop with all the conspiracy theories now?
 
Nope, because like you said, some just can't bear the thought of Ford doing something good. Many of them work for Toyota.
#11247 of 13142
Re: EPA certifies Fusion Hybrid [bpizzuti] by plekto
Dec 31, 2008 (11:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bpizzuti (Dec 31, 2008 9:05 am)

You've got to be kidding. Toyota's "hybrid" is really a dual engine vehicle and not a true hybrid.
 
A proper hybrid uses a high efficiency on-board generator(pick your poison) to make electricity to charge the batteries and electric motors. There is no transmission as the car is basically an electric vehicle with a greatly extended range.
#11248 of 13142
Re: EPA certifies Fusion Hybrid [plekto] by backy
Jan 01, 2009 (5:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: plekto (Dec 31, 2008 11:59 pm)

That is not a mainstream definition of "hybrid." But for the sake of discussion, which mid-sized sedans qualify as hybrids under your definition?
#11249 of 13142
Re: EPA certifies Fusion Hybrid [backy] by bpizzuti
Jan 01, 2009 (6:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: backy (Jan 01, 2009 5:54 am)

None. He's describing the Volt. Also the same system they use in trains, where it's referred to as "diesel-electric." There's nothing hybrid about it because it doesn't use a combination of both methods to propel the car (hence the word "hybrid" versus "gas-electric" or "on-board-generator)" etc).

Messages Page 1125 of 1315
1
...
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
...
1315
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement