Sign In Join 



Midsize Sedans 2.0

13286 messages,  Last post on Nov 30, 2009 at 12:48 AM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Sonata, Toyota Camry, Honda Accord, Nissan Altima, Volkswagen Passat, Mazda MAZDA6, Ford Fusion, Chevrolet Malibu, Saturn Aura, Car Comparisons, Sedan


Messages Page 1125 of 1329
1
...
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
...
1329
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#11236 of 13286
Re: EPA certifies Fusion Hybrid [akirby] by vanman1
Dec 30, 2008 (12:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Dec 30, 2008 6:55 am)

New Fusion is impressive. Certainly puts the pressure on GM with the upcoming 2-Mode Hybrid Malibu.
 
I heard the Fusion availability will be pretty limited though. I guess lower gas prices have also killed off some hybrid demand. Too bad because Ford has something big here.
#11237 of 13286
Re: EPA certifies Fusion Hybrid [akirby] by kdshapiro
Dec 30, 2008 (2:18 pm)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Dec 30, 2008 11:46 am)

What Ford did wisely is to ensure they didn't get sued by Toyota by working out an agreement with Toyota. I take that to mean, without this agreement they believed there could be a long, and expensive litigation process to which they decided coopetition is better than the unknown.
#11238 of 13286
Re: EPA certifies Fusion Hybrid [kdshapiro] by akirby
Dec 30, 2008 (3:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kdshapiro (Dec 30, 2008 2:18 pm)

That's exactly what happened, because they found out after they wrote some of the software that it was similar enough to what Toyota had patented that it might be challenged in court. However they actually wrote their own software - they didn't copy it or buy it from Toyota. And now the FFH doesn't even use that software anymore. Just trying to dispel that myth once and for all.
#11239 of 13286
Re: EPA certifies Fusion Hybrid [akirby] by elroy5
Dec 30, 2008 (4:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Dec 30, 2008 3:12 pm)

So we are supposed to believe Ford gave Toyota patents, just out of the kindness of their hearts? If Ford didn't copy anything, it was a pretty stupid move. Ford had to have done something underhanded. Nobody gives away technology.
#11240 of 13286
Re: EPA certifies Fusion Hybrid [elroy5] by tenpin288
Dec 30, 2008 (5:44 pm)
Reply

Replying to: elroy5 (Dec 30, 2008 4:51 pm)

elroy, this has been discussed ad nauseum in this and other forums. Ford did not infringe Toyota patents. Just like most businesses do today, Ford and Toyota entered into a cross licensing agreement to avoid any infringement problems. Here are a few comments about the agreement:
 
From wikipedia:
 
The Escape Hybrid uses technology similar to that used in Toyota's Prius. Ford engineers realized their technology may conflict with patents held by Toyota, which led to a 2004 patent-sharing accord between the companies, licensing Ford's use of some of Toyota's hybrid technology in exchange for Toyota's use of some of Ford's diesel and direct-injection engine technology.[9] Both Ford and Toyota state that Ford received no technical assistance from Toyota in developing the hybrid powertrain, but that some hybrid engine technologies developed by Ford independently were found to be similar to technologies previously patented by Toyota.

From Businessweek.com:
 
Ford Motor Company was THE FIRST auto manufacturer in the world to put a full hybrid SUV on the road.
The Ford Escape Hybrid (and now the Mercury Mariner Hybrid) was engineered, validated and is manufactured in the United States. There is NO Toyota technology or parts in our vehicle. We received NO technical support from Toyota when designing our hybrid system.
We entered into a business arrangement with Toyota where we EXCHANGED patent licences. We licensed 21 patents from Toyota because our hybrid system design was close enough in design to what Toyota did that we wanted to ensure there were no accusations of infringement. At the same time, Toyota licensed several patents from Ford for emissions technology. This was a financial transaction — one which goes on in our industry every day.

 
This is a common business practice in today's copyright-gone-mad litigious economy. Nothing underhanded there.
#11241 of 13286
Re: EPA certifies Fusion Hybrid [tenpin288] by berri
Dec 30, 2008 (6:30 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tenpin288 (Dec 30, 2008 5:44 pm)

I believe Ford may be honest on this one. There is a whole business out there using patents (many of them pretty shaky patents at that) and threatened litigation to extort money. The lawyers are once again further helping America lose its competitiveness and Congress just sits on its ass taking lobbyist payola while Americans keep losing jobs or paying inflated prices because of this nonsense. The patent is an important protection, but not when they are issued for marginal at best concepts that often build off concepts already around. This issue needs to be fixed, but it probably won't since the Bar Associations have plenty of lobbyists to help keep the over supply of attorney's employed.
#11242 of 13286
Re: EPA certifies Fusion Hybrid [tenpin288] by elroy5
Dec 30, 2008 (9:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tenpin288 (Dec 30, 2008 5:44 pm)

tenpin, I was not the one who brought this subject up.
 
We licensed 21 patents from Toyota because our hybrid system design was close enough in design to what Toyota did that we wanted to ensure there were no accusations of infringement.
 
How did these two designs become so similar? Pure coincidence?
None of the Ford guys knew anything about Toyota's hybrid system, or how it worked? And didn't use that knowledge, to help them along? Please
Actually, why would the consumer care where the hybrid technology came from? As long as the system works. The fact that Ford people are so defensive about it, says to me, they have their own doubts, as to how original Ford's system is.
#11243 of 13286
Re: EPA certifies Fusion Hybrid [berri] by bpizzuti
Dec 31, 2008 (9:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: berri (Dec 30, 2008 6:30 pm)

Toyota will probably threaten Ford with something again, for several reasons:
 
1. How dare some silly American manufacturer develop a better hybrid system than Toyota?
2. Toyota has the cash to sue, Ford can't afford to get into litigation right now
3. Toyota is jealous of the F150, and might want to reskin it and sell it as the next Tundra
 
Luckily the other Fusion models look extremely wonderful and candidates for Car of the Year from someone. I want one, and I'll take an I4 SEL if I can't get the Hybrid (I drive 90% highway anyway, paying the hybrid premium is a questionable move despite how well the Fusion Hybrid does on the highway).
#11244 of 13286
Re: EPA certifies Fusion Hybrid [akirby] by mickeyrom
Dec 31, 2008 (9:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Dec 30, 2008 11:46 am)

Well if it's not the same,it surely is similar enough to make me wonder.Nothing wrong with that,it's inevitable that there will be similarities.Heck, aren't all cars similar in many many ways?
#11245 of 13286
Re: EPA certifies Fusion Hybrid [elroy5] by akirby
Dec 31, 2008 (10:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: elroy5 (Dec 30, 2008 9:50 pm)

How did these two designs become so similar? Pure coincidence?
 
Yes, it was PURE COINCIDENCE. When two people write software that does similar functions it often turns out the same. There are only so many ways to do something. It happens ALL THE TIME - you just don't normally hear about it.
 
You (and others) just can't bear the thought that Ford did something good - on their own - and you just have to find something to detract from that.
 
Can we stop with all the conspiracy theories now?

Messages Page 1125 of 1329
1
...
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
...
1329
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement