Sign In Join 



Midsize Sedans 2.0

13240 messages,  Last post on Nov 27, 2009 at 9:15 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Sonata, Toyota Camry, Honda Accord, Nissan Altima, Volkswagen Passat, Mazda MAZDA6, Ford Fusion, Chevrolet Malibu, Saturn Aura, Car Comparisons, Sedan


Messages Page 1081 of 1325
1
...
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
...
1325
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#10798 of 13240
Re: help me choose a sedan [canddmeyer] by lucky_777
Sep 16, 2008 (5:40 am)
Reply

Replying to: canddmeyer (Sep 16, 2008 2:26 am)

What's wrong with V6 Camry? 3.5L Toyota V6 is a well proven engine. Most problems with 6 spd auto Camry transmissions resolved.
#10799 of 13240
Re: upper-level compact, or basic midsize? [akirby] by backy
Sep 16, 2008 (7:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Sep 16, 2008 4:36 am)

Yes, but he was looking specifically at a 2008 Fusion. ESC is optional for 2009, right? Not standard as on the Accord, Mazda6, Passat, Sonata, Aura (some trims), and Malibu (some trims)?
#10800 of 13240
Re: upper-level compact, or basic midsize? [backy] by akirby
Sep 16, 2008 (8:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: backy (Sep 16, 2008 7:22 am)

I know but the way you phrased it might lead some to believe it still isn't available at all. And what difference does it make whether it's optional or standard? It's available.
#10801 of 13240
Re: upper-level compact, or basic midsize? [akirby] by backy
Sep 16, 2008 (9:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Sep 16, 2008 8:16 am)

It could make a huge difference depending on how widely available the option is. For example, ABS/ESC is optional on the Optima. But just try to find a car with that package! Hopefully it will be a widely available option, on all trims of the Fusion (and Milan).
#10802 of 13240
Re: upper-level compact, or basic midsize? [backy] by akirby
Sep 16, 2008 (10:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: backy (Sep 16, 2008 9:03 am)

I thought ESC was going to be required on all vehicles at some point.....?
 
It's easier to factory order a Ford the way you want it than an import, so getting exactly what you want is just a matter of waiting 4-6 weeks in most cases.
#10803 of 13240
Re: upper-level compact, or basic midsize? [akirby] by thegraduate
Sep 16, 2008 (10:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Sep 16, 2008 10:05 am)

I thought ESC was going to be required on all vehicles at some point.....?
 
September 2011.
#10804 of 13240
Toyota 2.5L by thegraduate
Sep 17, 2008 (7:07 am)
Reply
Golly, how many engines does Toyota produce?
 
Referring to the RAV4 for 2009,
From Carscoop.Blogspot.com :
 
The new 2.5L unit that produces 179 HP at 6,000 RPM, along with 172 lb.-ft. of torque at 4,000 RPM (versus 166 HP and 165 lb.-ft. respectively of the previous 2.4L), is matted to a new 4-speed automatic transmission. According to Toyota, fuel efficiency is improved over the 2008 RAV-4 2.4L with EPA mpg estimates of 22 city/28 highway on 4x2 models and 21 city/27 highway on 4x4 models. The top-of-the-line 269 HP 3.5-liter V6 remains unchanged.
 
I guess THIS is what will go into the 2010 Camry. Makes more sense than the 2.7L. It'll be more torquey than either of Honda's 2.4L engines. A plus in these ever-heavier midsize sedans.
#10805 of 13240
Where's Honda? by thegraduate
Sep 17, 2008 (7:45 am)
Reply
It seems that Honda, which was once a leader in engineering engines that were top of the class in power vs. economy is slacking.
 
Toyota's Camry has the 2GR 3.5L which is a mileage leader AND the class-leader in acceleration as well. They have a 6-speed Auto, as does Ford, Mazda, VW, and General Motors. Nissan has upped the ante more with a good implementation of a CVT, and should be applauded for making a 4-cylinder engine that rivals some V6 engines in acceleration, all with city fuel economy and torque that is top of the class.
 
Honda's engine is lacking in torque (either one, the 4-cyl models vs. other 4s or the V6 vs other V6s), but doesn't "make it all better" with great economy; if anything, the real-world fuel economy seems to have taken a nosedive compared to the previous generation.
 
Even the once-lowly Hyundai Sonata matches or beats the Accord with its fuel economy, all without VCM; a system which has been a problem in a number of cars (check out the Accord VCM Thread here on Edmunds).
 
*Steps off Soapbox*
 
Sorry, I just had to get that out. Honda went from being a class leader in powertrains and performance in the previous generation to being mediocre/midpack in one generation. Did making the Accord big and beefy also make it too big for its britches?
#10806 of 13240
Re: Toyota 2.5L [thegraduate] by aviboy97
Sep 17, 2008 (9:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Sep 17, 2008 7:07 am)

That engine would really spice up the Camry. I would assume 22-24city 30-32hwy for the EPA estimates.
#10807 of 13240
Re: Toyota 2.5L [aviboy97] by thegraduate
Sep 17, 2008 (9:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: aviboy97 (Sep 17, 2008 9:28 am)

May give Ford a run for its "Best-In-Class Fuel Economy" claim. Maybe 23/33? Toyota likes to gear tall, remember!
 
EDIT: That claim Ford is making is for their upcoming Fusion refresh.

Messages Page 1081 of 1325
1
...
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
...
1325
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement