Sign In Join 



Midsize Sedans 2.0

13142 messages,  Last post on Nov 08, 2009 at 7:34 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Sonata, Toyota Camry, Honda Accord, Nissan Altima, Volkswagen Passat, Mazda MAZDA6, Ford Fusion, Chevrolet Malibu, Saturn Aura, Car Comparisons, Sedan


Messages Page 1050 of 1315
1
...
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
...
1315
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#10483 of 13142
Re: Mazda6 revs [madpistol] by akirby
Aug 13, 2008 (4:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: madpistol (Aug 12, 2008 5:29 pm)

No more weird than flooring it and watch the tach stay at 4000 RPM while your speed increases. At least that's how Ford's CVT operated - not sure about Nissan's.
#10484 of 13142
Re: for those looking [backy] by captain2
Aug 13, 2008 (12:56 pm)
Reply

Replying to: backy (Aug 06, 2008 3:30 pm)

agree with you on this one. My wife's 03 Altima has a 20 gallon fuel tank and depending on the gas pump idiosyncrasies (your word) and my own patience the tank can take anywhere from 16 to 19 gallons to fill it up all from the same reported '0' distance to empty. Higher speed gas pumps aggravate the error, slowing down the fill rate lends itself to a bit more consistency. Until someone comes up with a way to minimize fill up variances like this - old fashioned hand mileage calcs. are pretty much worthless. Have found that computer FE numbers, OTH tend to be closer and certainly not subject to a 20-30% fillup volume (and therefore FE calculation) variance.
That said, I definitely will pay attention to fuel consumption increases reported by the trip computer and more likely dismiss the 'calculated' method - if I'm looking to further evaluate how well my car is running at any given time.
#10485 of 13142
rpms and gas tanks by jeffyscott
Aug 13, 2008 (1:08 pm)
Reply
Apparently the Mazda6 manual transmission (in the outgoing model) just about drops the top gear compared to the automatic. I believe that someone had posted that their manual Mazda6 runs at 3400 rpm at 70 mph. Today I noted that at a steady 35 mph, I was at about 1800 rpm in 4th gear, so the auto would be at 3600 rpm in 4th at 70 mph. That is nearly the same rpm as the manual in 5th.
 
Regarding filling gas tanks, I think some cars have better "fillability" than others. This is one of those little things you find out after owning a car for a while. I have to say Mazda seems to have done a great job on this with the 6. Every time the pump clicks off, it is pretty close to as full as you can get it.
 
Most cars I have had would click off, then I set the pump on a lower rate and a fairly significant additional amount of gas goes in before it clicks off again. With my Mazda6 after it clicks off on the high settng, if I try it on a lower setting it clicks off again immediately and not much can be added by manually topping off either.
#10486 of 13142
Re: Mazda6 revs [akirby] by captain2
Aug 13, 2008 (1:19 pm)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Aug 13, 2008 4:14 am)

actually what happens with a CVT is that the tranny is relying quite heavily on the computer's interpretation of driver intent - meaning how hard and how far you press the accelerator. The engine speed may 'set' at any level the computer deems necessary to provide what IT is estimating you want. The old Ford/Volvo CVT/DT 3.0 application (like in the 500) a really really poor application of this technology and one reason why Ford so quickly discontinued it. A DT 3.0 screaming at 4-5000 rpm or so trying to pull 2 tons around not a pleasant experience. The Nissan CVT OTH as well as the engines they are attached to - quite a different story. And yes it is 'weird' but is also extremely smooth because there are jerky upshifts or downshifts - I could well imagine, however, that the CVT could become objectionable especially when coupled to an unrefined engine.
The CVT is I would guess the tranny of the future in this (and other) classes, simply because it is mechanically simpler and offers less mechanical losses (better FE) than the conventional auto tranny. The driving experience may never be quite the same...
#10487 of 13142
Re: rpms and gas tanks [jeffyscott] by aviboy97
Aug 13, 2008 (1:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jeffyscott (Aug 13, 2008 1:08 pm)

That was me!
 
I own a 2005 Mazda5 4 cyl mtx and I spin 3,200 rpm's going 70 mph in 5th
#10488 of 13142
Re: Mazda6 revs [captain2] by akirby
Aug 14, 2008 (4:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: captain2 (Aug 13, 2008 1:19 pm)

There was nothing objectionable about the 3.0L Duratec/CVT in the Freestyle loaner that I drove, even at 4000 RPM. Just the fact that the speed was changing while the engine RPM stayed constant.
 
Ford is going with dual clutch Powershift in their new small cars claiming 10% better economy over a 6 speed auto.
 
Other than Nissan - who is committing to CVTs?
#10489 of 13142
Re: Mazda6 revs [akirby] by jeffyscott
Aug 14, 2008 (5:37 am)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Aug 14, 2008 4:51 am)

Other than Nissan - who is committing to CVTs?
 
Maybe Mitsubishi??? Not that they are of much significance in the US. When is Ford planning to go to the DSG style automatics in the US? The interweb tells me it is already availble on European Fords.
#10490 of 13142
Re: Mazda6 revs [akirby] by captain2
Aug 14, 2008 (5:44 am)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Aug 14, 2008 4:51 am)

who is committing to CVTs?
Nissan certainly with the biggest - using the tranny essentially line wide - Toyota and Honda using them in their economy champions like the Prius/Civic. It's not like the CVT is new by any means, but something that has been improved/perfected primarily by Nissan. Would not expect a financially and developmentally strapped Co. like Ford to pioneer or even lead the way in the development of any new technologies. I think you'll find that Ford could not use the Volvo sourced chain driven CVT in the Taurus because it couldn't handle the HP increase that came with the bigger DT and was further problematical from a reliability perspective - something that hasn't been a problem in the Nissans since the Murano of several years back.
Pooh, pooh the CVT if you will - it does present the driver with a different kind of driving experience - but it is a solid choice in all our FE challenged futures given that there are significantly less mechanical losses vs. the traditonal auto.. If Ford is going to claim the efficiencies of an automatically shifted manual tranny - would suggest they look to VW as well as the Italians for advice in how to do it.....
#10491 of 13142
Re: Mazda6 revs [captain2] by thegraduate
Aug 14, 2008 (6:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: captain2 (Aug 14, 2008 5:44 am)

If Ford is going to claim the efficiencies of an automatically shifted manual tranny - would suggest they look to VW as well as the Italians for advice in how to do it.....
 
Yes, because we know VW builds high-quality and long-lasting pieces of equipment!
#10492 of 13142
Re: Mazda6 revs [thegraduate] by captain2
Aug 14, 2008 (6:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Aug 14, 2008 6:16 am)

point taken, grad but I think you'll find that VWs problems are not really related too much to the DSG but more towards the engine and electonic side of things and even those have improved recently. Haven't driven a DSG equipped VW or Audi yet but by all reports these things will shift ''better" than you or I could do it ourselves.

Messages Page 1050 of 1315
1
...
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
...
1315
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement