Sign In Join 

Midsize Sedans 2.0

14308 messages,  Last post on Mar 14, 2010 at 6:40 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Sonata, Toyota Camry, Honda Accord, Nissan Altima, Volkswagen Passat, Mazda MAZDA6, Ford Fusion, Chevrolet Malibu, Saturn Aura, Car Comparisons, Sedan


Messages Page 1024 of 1431
1
...
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
...
1431
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#10230 of 14308
Re: Question [moparbad] by jeffyscott
Jul 18, 2008 (8:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: moparbad (Jul 18, 2008 6:24 am)

While I would agree it appears to have become more like it's competitors, fuel economy rating did improve for the 4 cyl or at least stayed the same, while power increased. EPA has the 2008 4 cyl at 21/28, while the 2009 is at 21/30. However, for some reason combined is listed at 24 for both and annual fuel cost estimate is the same also .
 
The V6 is a US only engine, which may have something to do with the apparent inefficiency, if it was designed with cheap gas in mind.
#10231 of 14308
Re: Question [jeffyscott] by igozoomzoom
Jul 20, 2008 (12:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: jeffyscott (Jul 18, 2008 8:27 am)

Apparently, Mazda was trying to match the class leaders in fuel economy with the 4-cylinder and top competing V6 models in performance/power. Unfortunately, they didn't foresee $4+ fuel prices at the time. Sales of the V6 models will suffer, no doubt.
 
At least the 2.5L is a huge improvement over previous 2.3L in terms of performance and NVH issues. All reports so far have said the 2.5L feels more than up to the task. The most impressive feature of the new engine is the increase of 24hp and 28lb-ft of torque AND highway mileage improved by 2mpg.
 
The V6 succeeds in matching or beating the other guys in terms of power- compared to the old 3.0L, it gains 60hp and 72lb-ft of torque and fuel economy remains at 17/25.
 
It would be very wise of Mazda to find a way to improve the V6 fuel economy ASAP! The Ford Taurus, which weighs 100 pounds more and uses the 3.5L V6 that the Mazda's 3.7L is based on, manages figures of 18/28. The gains are primarily due to different gearing in the 6-speed automatic. Similar changes to the Mazda6 would hurt performance a little, but the mpg gains would be worth the trade-off.
#10232 of 14308
Re: Question [igozoomzoom] by akirby
Jul 20, 2008 (5:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: igozoomzoom (Jul 20, 2008 12:06 am)

Ford's new PIP 3.0L will only have 240 hp but will have better fuel economy than either the old 3.0L or the 3.5/3.7L duratecs. Given the price of gas this may turn out to be one of their better decisions.
#10233 of 14308
I want to hear the new Mazda 3.7L engine by madpistol
Jul 20, 2008 (4:31 pm)
Reply
I want to hear what the new Mazda 3.7L engine sounds like. Go listen to the sound clips of the Ford Taurus's 3.5L on youtube. I thought that the 2.5L engine in the newer Altima sounds better, let alone all the Japanese 3.5L engines. The V6's from Japanese automakers sound like supercars compared to Ford's 3.5. That being said, I'm sure the 3.7L has more of a sport tuned engine, so surely it has a much throatier engine and exhaust note... Lets hope so.
#10234 of 14308
Re: I want to hear the new Mazda 3.7L engine [madpistol] by madpistol
Jul 20, 2008 (4:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: madpistol (Jul 20, 2008 4:31 pm)

To add to my earlier post, I found an engine sound clip here 1:30 :
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EF-DMsQjQ5w
 
IMO, it sounds 10x better than the 3.5L Ford engine.
#10235 of 14308
Top Ten Sellers for June by thegraduate
Jul 21, 2008 (6:51 am)
Reply
For the month of June, as a brand, Honda was up 14%. GM was down 8%, Ford down 19%, Chrysler down 28%, Toyota down 12%, and Nissan down 7%.
 
As models, here is how the top ten stack up:
 
1 Honda Accord 39,697
  
2 Honda Civic 37,257
  
3 Toyota Corolla 36,205
  
4 Toyota Camry 35,939
  
5 Ford F-150 24,988
  
6 Chevrolet Silverado (1500) 24,799
  
7 Nissan Altima 23,208
  
8 Chevrolet Cobalt 20,888
  
9 Ford Focus 17,950
  
10 Hyundai Sonata 16,875
#10236 of 14308
Re: Question [akirby] by igozoomzoom
Jul 21, 2008 (7:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Jul 20, 2008 5:54 am)

I wonder if Ford's recent infatuation with all things turbocharged (EcoBoost) might even result in a light-pressure turbo 4-cylinder supplanting the V6 in the not-too-distant-future?
 
I have read about a possible Fusion GT (or SVT, SVO, or....) with a 300+ hp turbocharged engine, but it will be interesting to see if it comes to fruition in the current economic climate. I don't even want to imagine what the EPA ratings would be on such a beast!
 
I've also wondered if Ford has utilized the turbocharging experts that are, corporately speaking, already under the Ford umbrella- Volvo. They could take a car that weighed as much as a tank, had an old 2-valve 4-cylinder under the hood and the aerodynamics of the Hoover Dam and, with the addition of a turbocharger and a few other tweaks, they suddenly had a station wagon that seemed more fit for the Autobahn than car pool duty.
 
Sadly, they probably didn't even think to ask for Volvo's help....
#10237 of 14308
Re: Question [igozoomzoom] by thegraduate
Jul 21, 2008 (8:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: igozoomzoom (Jul 21, 2008 7:51 am)

Sadly, they probably didn't even think to ask for Volvo's help....
 
It's not that... they just can't afford the long-distance call to Sweden.
#10238 of 14308
Re: Question [igozoomzoom] by akirby
Jul 21, 2008 (8:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: igozoomzoom (Jul 21, 2008 7:51 am)

Given Mulally's mandate for global engineering and utilizing Ford resources everywhere I think it's a safe bet that Volvo engineers were/are involved if they have expertise to offer.
 
There are supposed to be 2.0L and 2.5L EcoBoost engines to replace/augment the V6 engines but they were scheduled later than the 3.5L. My guess is they're trying to pull those ahead and maybe working on a 1.6L EcoBoost also. Unfortunately Ford doesn't have a lot of resources left so they're having to pick and choose what to work on first.
#10239 of 14308
Re: Top Ten Sellers for June [thegraduate] by igozoomzoom
Jul 21, 2008 (8:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Jul 21, 2008 6:51 am)

I'm a little surprised that the Accord outsold the Civic, though only by 2,440 cars. The sheer numbers are even more amazing because the Civic and Accord are the only vehicles in the top 10 that are NOT sold to fleets. I just wish the Civic wasn't so darn ugly! =)
 
I wonder if the number of Civics sold was limited by physical inventory available? They sold over 53,000 of them in May and exceeded everyone's (even their own) expectations and/or projections. So it stands to reason that dealer inventory can't possibly recover overnight (or in a week or two, even).

Messages Page 1024 of 1431
1
...
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
...
1431
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?
Connect with Facebook Sign In Using Your Facebook AccountNew!

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement