Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Hyundai Genesis Hyundai Genesis Sedan 2009-
5696 messages, Last post on Dec 04, 2009 at 9:27 AM
You are in the Hyundai Genesis Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: tjc78 (Jul 06, 2009 9:55 am) Flat floor...yes, you can get away with that in a FWD car, RWD don't really think it's workable in a car. The rear may be roomier and offers reclining seats, but with the amount of room the Genesis rear seats offers, I doubt anyone would be complaining. In terms of handling, it really boils down to your taste. There are plenty of Genesis owners that love the ride as much as you love the ride in the Avalon. I tested a Genesis and found it to ride even better than my Azera. It's just odd that you point out the Avalon being the much better car and yet, you chose the Genesis yourself. Funny, you don't think the Genesis should be compared with $50K cars and yet...most of the publications have and have shown the Genesis to hold it's own against them in terms of fit & finish and quality of materials. I definitely applaud your leap, but I see it took the Genesis to make you take that leap. Either way, I think you'll find the experience to be rather pleasant if you remain completely honest with yourself.
|
|
|
Replying to: backy (Jul 06, 2009 9:57 am) Taurus SHO vs. G37
|
|
|
Replying to: tjc78 (Jul 06, 2009 10:01 am) Personally, the value is in getting the flagship model fully loaded for a price I would pay for a fully loaded entry-level model or moderately equipped mid-level model. |
|
|
Replying to: allmet33 (Jul 06, 2009 10:06 am) After 3 Toyota and two Avalons in particular I just wanted something different. The '09 Avalon is the same as the '06 I had. Also I wanted RWD and the only vehicles in my price range were the Infiniti G (much too small) the 300/Charger (never!), or the G8. On paper the Genesis has everything you would want and its a good car but after 2500 miles I just wouldn't put it in a class above its price. I guess my biggest argument is that everyone thinks there is no car in the Genesis's price range can compete, I just flat out disagree. While the 3.5 is more refined, the 3.8 is matching fuel economy numbers with it's "lack" of refinement. I am seeing about a 1 - 1.5 MPG drop from my Avalon. With the little bit of extra power the 3.8 has I would say its a wash in terms of FE
|
|
|
Replying to: allmet33 (Jul 06, 2009 10:09 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: tjc78 (Jul 06, 2009 10:36 am) Now in terms of getting the RWD, there are NO cars in that price range that compete with the Genesis and give you what you get. Like you said...the G37, but it's smaller. You hardly want to step up to the GS line, that's more money. 300/Charger are options, but hardly stack up against the Genesis. Both are getting long in the tooth in regards to styling. So...while technically, there are a couple cars that can compete price-wise with the Genesis, you're comparing FWD to RWD and that changes the dynamic a bit. Folks try to use RWD as a knock against the Genesis, but do they realize how many taxi cabs in cities like New York or Chicago that go through harsh winters and are RWD??? Either a good set of snow tires or chains make a world of difference. In an area like the DC Metro...a good set of all season tires would be just fine. 
|
|
|
Replying to: allmet33 (Jul 06, 2009 10:42 am) ) before leasing my Genesis. The ES350 is nice, but small (again basically a smaller slightly nicer Avalon). My biggest requirement is it must be a full size sedan, which limits my choices quite a bit The Genesis overall is doing fine for me right now. I do like that everyone asks me what it is and that you don't see one at every corner (actually I never see any). The lease was atttractive and I am comfortable in it. I am still surprised how well it handles, I just wish the ride was a little more like my Avalon and the powertrain was a little more responsive.
|
|
|
Replying to: backy (Jul 06, 2009 10:42 am) Taurus with a curb weight of 4224 lbs. will be using 263 hp to propel it, while the Genesis has a curb weight of 3748 lbs. uses 290 hp. Throw AWD in on the Taurus and the weight goes up. I really don't see the Taurus stacking up too well. Another case of American ingenuity falling short of it's foreign counterparts. Honestly...RWD could be an issue for folks that live in areas like Buffalo, Boston or places like that. Cabbies in NY, Chi-Town and cities like that have driven cars with RWD with no problems for decades. Heck, I had no problems with my 86 1/2 Supra here in the DC Metro. AWD is nice, but it comes at a cost too, more weight, lower FE, and more to maintain as well. Good snow tires or chains solve that problem. All this and the starting price of the Taurus is $2000+ more than that of the Genesis, and the MKZ is $5k+ more for a "luxury" version of the Taurus, based on Edmunds TMV pricing. Vehicle Comparo
|
|
|
Replying to: allmet33 (Jul 06, 2009 10:42 am)
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans Hyundai Genesis Hyundai Genesis Sedan 2009-
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Hyundai Genesis
2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
