Sign In Join 



Are gas prices fueling your pain? - READ ONLY

10042 messages,  Last post on Jul 12, 2008 at 3:07 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Fuel Efficiency (MPG)


Messages Page 866 of 1005
1
...
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
...
1005
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#8643 of 10042
Re: Gas prices fuel dip in fishing [gagrice] by kdhspyder
Jun 11, 2008 (7:22 am)

Replying to: gagrice (Jun 11, 2008 4:39 am)

I'll let you know in a month or so. We live in the center of one of the hottest family vacation spots in the mid-Atlantic states. Our guess is that a lot of people may forego their European or Middle Eastern or Asian vacations and 'stay at home' by going to the shore here.
 
Rather than spend $1500 / person in airfare and $200-$400 a night in a nice euro-hotel and $200+ per dinner at a nice restaurant having 4 couples rent a 10 BR beach house for $12000 a week is much more cost effective.
#8644 of 10042
Effects of higher gas prices on LI by jimbres
Jun 11, 2008 (8:20 am)
Drove out to my mother-in-law's beach house on the East End of Long Island last Saturday. For a perfect early summer beach day, eastbound traffic on the Long Island Expressway was noticeably lighter than usual. No need for the customary tap on the brakes at exit 56, for example. But my fellow travelers were not slowing down to save gas. I set my cruise control at 65 mph - that's 10 mph over the speed limit - & found that for every car I passed, 6 or 7 passed me. (When you see a Dodge Durango - a truck with the aerodynamics of a tool shed - moving along at 75+, you have to wonder if the owner forges credit cards for a living. How else can he keep that thing fueled up?)
 
Still, I found that holding my speed to 65 (I normally drive at 70 to 75 mph under those traffic conditions) didn't make our 60 mile trip seem any longer, & it was more relaxing. I could actually pay attention to what my wife was saying. It remains to be seen if that's good or bad for our marriage.
#8645 of 10042
Re: Good time to buy a used pickup? [andre1969] by dave8697
Jun 11, 2008 (8:29 am)

Replying to: andre1969 (Jun 10, 2008 7:40 pm)

yes it has the 4.3. I hauled down one of the last loads from my old house to the new house. When I first took the far away job 4 yrs ago, it was about $8 gas to drive my full size truck 94 mile round trip. Now it's over $8 a day to drive the full size to a 15 mile away job. Now I just have to sell the old house to stop the bleeding. That is a far bigger concern than if gas goes to $5 right now, but I think in the long run the move closer to work was necessary. I just picked a bad time to do it.
#8646 of 10042
Wasting $ on paying these guys! by kernick
Jun 11, 2008 (12:10 pm)
It's amazing to me that given their track-record of being wrong year after year, that they have the kahunas to make some of these predictions. As a taxpayer I'm pretty right now, that we're spending money paying for these forecasts!
 
http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2008-06-11-energy-dept-oil-gas-p- - rices_N.htm
 
"Caruso said oil prices are likely to stay high far into the future. He projected oil costing $107 a barrel in 2015."
 
This is a good example at why I don't like to give any more $ via any tax, while they waste $ with garbage like this.
#8647 of 10042
Re: Wasting $ on paying these guys! [kernick] by texases
Jun 11, 2008 (12:17 pm)

Replying to: kernick (Jun 11, 2008 12:10 pm)

Agree on nonsense forecasts, especially when they give a number, instead of a range. He should say something like 'prices are expected to be somewhere between $80 and $200 in 2015'. He can't know it any better than that.
 
More worrying: " oil giant BP said world oil production fell 0.2% in 2007, first decline since 2002, while consumption rose 1.1%, highlighting a tight supply-demand balance that has helped push oil prices to record levels."
#8648 of 10042
Based on today's info by larsb
Jun 11, 2008 (12:21 pm)
Based on the info they have today, the trends they have in place, and the fact that they do this for a living, doing those projections is just WHAT THEY DO.
 
Many hundreds of thousands of people around the world do "projections" for a living and that is a valuable service to a lot of people.
 
No one can see into the future - but with the best info, it is possible to make an "educated guess" based on hundreds and maybe thousands of data points.
 
I'm sure some of those guys projected $4 gas in June 2008.
#8649 of 10042
Re: Based on today's info [larsb] by gagrice
Jun 11, 2008 (12:35 pm)

Replying to: larsb (Jun 11, 2008 12:21 pm)

Projections are fine as long as the person wanting the projection is paying for it. I don't want the government using my tax money for WAG projections. Or polls where they ask 1000 people what they think and say it is a good cross section of 200 million voters. It could be erroneous projections that has run the price of oil beyond what it needs to be.
#8650 of 10042
Re: Based on today's info [larsb] by kernick
Jun 11, 2008 (12:40 pm)

Replying to: larsb (Jun 11, 2008 12:21 pm)

Don't get a big-head, but I'd trust your projection on the price of oil or gas in 2015, as much as this guy's. Why? Because the whole mathematical trend has broken down. There is no longer any relationship between if demand goes up 1%, oil goes up 2%.
 
Because we are now in an era where if oil goes up 1%, or supply goes down 2%, that may cause a 50% price increase which causes the economy to go down 5%, which then decrease the demand. But since no one can predict whether the price increase is 50% or 25% or 75%, no one can predict how the economy will go in this country never mind globally, and it just goes on and on. Throw in the uncertainty of the condition of fields in Mexico, the future of oil-shale, ANWR and other undrilled areas, and there's no way anyone will have a decent model.
 
These forecasters are simply doing these forecasts because they used to, and they get paid for it. If any of these guys actually knew what they were talking about, they wouldn't be working for a paycheck at the DOE. They'd be making millions elsewhere.
 
Similarly, I never trust a stock-pick from some "expert with a great track record" unless he himself has earned a fortune picking stocks.
#8651 of 10042
Mileage Vs Speed by bergyone
Jun 11, 2008 (12:49 pm)
I have a 2002 I-4 Camry. I normally get over 30 mpg on the Interstate, going the speed limit of 70. Is there a resource that will give the mpg vs speed for this car? Short, low speed trips reduce mileage significantly.
#8652 of 10042
Re: Mileage Vs Speed [bergyone] by texases
Jun 11, 2008 (12:56 pm)

Replying to: bergyone (Jun 11, 2008 12:49 pm)

For mpg vs. mph, I don't know of a source for 2002 Camry #s (you'd expect mpgs to decrease as speed goes up, of course). I assume you don't have a trip computer in the car. If you're really curious ($170 curious), you can get a Scangauge that plugs into your OBD-II port, discussed here:Scan Gauge blog

Messages Page 866 of 1005
1
...
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
...
1005
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement