Sign In Join 



Are gas prices fueling your pain? - READ ONLY

10042 messages,  Last post on Jul 12, 2008 at 3:07 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Fuel Efficiency (MPG)


Messages Page 589 of 1005
1
...
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
...
1005
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#5873 of 10042
Re: $4 is almost here! [imidazol97] by kdhspyder
Apr 17, 2008 (10:48 am)

Replying to: imidazol97 (Apr 17, 2008 8:38 am)

If they are doing this then it's just good business. It's keeping supply and demand in balance. When you go to a station and find it empty and dry then there's a real supply problem.
 
BTW there is no right of the buying public to purchase vehicles at less than MSRP or by using discounted rates or rebates. It's only a supply imbalance that has caused this. If the auto companies were smart enough they too would limit the supply to match demand and raise prices. But they have other issues which must be addressed first.
 
The steel companies are currently in exactly the same position as the oil companies. With the growth of China and India there is too much demand chasing a limited supply. Wholesale prices have jumped 50-100%.
#5874 of 10042
Re: Shoot... [kernick] by bpizzuti
Apr 17, 2008 (10:56 am)

Replying to: kernick (Apr 17, 2008 10:38 am)

Wanting to make a lot of money on business transactions is not corrupt.
 
No, but manipulating the markets so you're guaranteed to make a lot of money on business transactions is corrupt. In some situations, it's also illegal.
#5875 of 10042
Re: Shoot... [bpizzuti] by kdhspyder
Apr 17, 2008 (12:51 pm)

Replying to: bpizzuti (Apr 17, 2008 10:56 am)

If it's a matter of just holding back supply, if that's even possible in this day and age, or controlling the throughput of refineries to match seasonal demand then that's not corrupt it's just good business practices.
 
If in turn this control/matching drives up prices for a while, well then that's our decision to buy the product at those prices or not. You're viewing this from the perspective that you must have fuel. But that's not a given. None of us 'need' fuel. We 'want' fuel. That's a huge difference. We've come to expect that fuel is readily available at almost no cost.
 
That paradigm has changed. It may become a luxury.
#5876 of 10042
Re: Shoot... [kdhspyder] by bpizzuti
Apr 17, 2008 (1:04 pm)

Replying to: kdhspyder (Apr 17, 2008 12:51 pm)

Here's the deal. Yes, it makes sense for oil companies to lower the supply to increase their profits. But that only works if ALL of them do it. If even one oil company decides to halve it's profits by cutting prices and increasing supplies, then THEY make a bunch of money while the other oil companies get the shaft, because they pick up sales, increasing their income (and hence their profits).
 
Which means it's entirely possible that there is collaboration going on regarding keeping the supply low. Which is illegal (check the statutes on monopolism and abuse).
#5877 of 10042
Re: Shoot... [bpizzuti] by kernick
Apr 17, 2008 (1:19 pm)

Replying to: bpizzuti (Apr 17, 2008 10:56 am)

No, but manipulating the markets so you're guaranteed to make a lot of money on business transactions is corrupt.
 
You'd have to give some examples. Would it be corrupt for me to buy 200 foreclosed condos in an area, rent them for 3 years, and sell them for 3X as much? Is it corrupt that 1 Euro used to = $0.90, and traders now have it at 1 Euro = $1.59? Or that people are making a lot of money buying and selling all sorts of goods, real estate and services?
#5878 of 10042
Re: Shoot... [bpizzuti] by kdhspyder
Apr 17, 2008 (1:55 pm)

Replying to: bpizzuti (Apr 17, 2008 1:04 pm)

This only concerns US companies but yes I agree that if the US based companies all conspire to hold back supply then that is illegal. However if one does it and others follow suit and stay 'in step' without discussing it then that's not illegal. That's how the prices of steel were set for years and years. US Steel set the prices and the others followed suit exactly.
 
However the price of oil is set by the producers and their mostly state-owned marketing arms. These are not US companies so they can do whatever they want and it's not illegal. It's perfectly good capitalism, i.e. the one(s) with the power exert it over the one(s) without the power.
 
US monopoly laws do not apply to non-US companies doing business outside the US.
#5879 of 10042
Re: Shoot... [kdhspyder] by bpizzuti
Apr 17, 2008 (2:02 pm)

Replying to: kdhspyder (Apr 17, 2008 1:55 pm)

Unfortunately true. However, I think that's the first time I've heard socialism referred to as good capitalism.
 
BTW, just because we don't know they're discussing it doesn't mean they're not doing it...and laughing all the way to the bank.
#5880 of 10042
Re: Shoot... [bpizzuti] by tpe
Apr 17, 2008 (5:41 pm)

Replying to: bpizzuti (Apr 17, 2008 1:04 pm)

Global oil consumption has been growing at around 3% each year. This would be impossible if the oil producers were actually decreasing production. You can't consume more than is produced. With $115/barrel oil the domestic producers are doing whatever they can to maximize production. My understanding is there are localities in Texas with booming economies as a result. Now OPEC could be limiting production, but I doubt it. Regardless, they aren't bound by our anti-trust laws so all the ranting in the world isn't going to change how OPEC operates. We can only look at ourselves and ask, "how did we become so dependent, so vulnerable"?
#5881 of 10042
Re: Shoot... [kernick] by ny540i6
Apr 17, 2008 (6:40 pm)

Replying to: kernick (Apr 17, 2008 1:19 pm)

Would it be corrupt for me to buy 200 foreclosed condos in an area, rent them for 3 years, and sell them for 3X as much?
 
Yeah.... this is corrupt in two ways... first, that I had not thought of it first, or did not have the guts to take the gamble, and second, that I insist on living in that area, and am pissed off at the asking price.
#5882 of 10042
Re: Shoot... [bpizzuti] by humblecoder
Apr 17, 2008 (7:29 pm)

Replying to: bpizzuti (Apr 17, 2008 1:04 pm)

Which means it's entirely possible that there is collaboration going on regarding keeping the supply low. Which is illegal (check the statutes on monopolism and abuse).
 
Actually, there IS collaboration going on to control the supply of oil.... You may have heard of an organization called OPEC? They are a cartel (fancy word for monopoly) of oil producing countries which meet from time to time to determine how much oil they are going to supply.
 
The thing is, what they are doing isn't "illegal" since they aren't governed by the laws of the United States of America. You see, the laws of the USA only apply within the borders of the USA, despite what Bush might have let you to believe.

Messages Page 589 of 1005
1
...
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
...
1005
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement