Sign In Join 



Is Ford's End Right Behind Chrysler's?

180 messages,  Last post on Nov 08, 2007 at 7:04 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News, Coupe


Messages Page 1 of 18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
18
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1 of 180
Is Ford's End Right Behind Chrysler's?? by drfill
Apr 04, 2007 (6:08 pm)
Reply
   Ford F-Series struggling to stay on top, waiting 18 long months for a redesign. They are reduced to lying about it's towing abilities, just to slow the mass exodus!
 
   Can't name their current line-up, making many changes in the last year.
 
   Anyone inspired by the new vehicles coming out?
 
   Ford Edge is good, but already getting outshined by Mazda CX-7. Would someone buy the Edge over the CX-7?
 
   Ford Flex? Looks like a Mini Cooper, without the style or anything nice. Redesigned Ford Focus award-winning days are over. Pretty brutal look.
 
   No news on Ford Ranger. Exploder's days are numbered. 500/Taurus sales continue to tumble, and prices will start at $24k? They're afraid to redesign Crown Vic at this point, the only car that actually hits it's target.
 
   Since Mark Fields took over, things have taken a turn for the worst!
 
   At least Chrysler has some vehicles that hit their target market, and have some appeal! At least they have 300, Caravan, and Jeep.
 
   Outside of the NEXT F-150, the cubbard is pretty bare.
 
   Fleets sales are making things look better than they are, sales wise.
  
   The biggest problem is their Turnaround Plan bit the dust! Or was it Way Forward (I think they misnamed that too.)?
 
   Can anyone find a silver lining? A reason for Hope? I think they're having more trouble attracting traffic than Chrysler is.
 
   DrFill
#2 of 180
Re: Is Ford's End Right Behind Chrysler's?? [drfill] by circlew
Apr 05, 2007 (4:10 am)
Reply

Replying to: drfill (Apr 04, 2007 6:08 pm)

Ford as we know it today will go away. Just a matter of time.
 
The market has changed so much and Ford as well as Chrysler and GM think THEIR plans will always work and invariably, they get it wrong.
 
Here's an example of a comment from DCX Chairman yesterday:
 
CEO on the fact that the Chrysler unit lost $1.5 billion in 2006:
  
"The crucial factor was the unforeseeable shift in demand to smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles which was triggered by increased gas prices in the U.S.," Zetsche said. He noted that Chrysler's strengths have been minivans, pickups and sport utility vehicles, autos not known for their fuel efficiency.
 
Unfortunately, The Big 3 were blind sided by a SUDDEN increase in gas prices. I remember visiting a Lincoln dealer at the end of 2005 and most of the new vehicles were Navigators. What a joke!
 
Regards,
OW
#3 of 180
Re: Is Ford's End Right Behind Chrysler's?? [drfill] by gagrice
Apr 05, 2007 (5:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: drfill (Apr 04, 2007 6:08 pm)

My nephew bought a new Explorer to replace his 5 year old model. He hates it. Wants his old one back. His dad is hanging on to his 1995 Explorer in hopes that Ford will return to building a decent SUV. Looks bleak
#4 of 180
Re: Is Ford's End Right Behind Chrysler's?? [circlew] by paisan
Apr 05, 2007 (5:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: circlew (Apr 05, 2007 4:10 am)

Chysler's strength was SUVs? I didn't realize that seeing as they have like 3 of them?
 
Durango and the Jeeps?
 
-mike
#5 of 180
Looks like it's up to the F-150 by drfill
Apr 05, 2007 (6:25 am)
Reply
 
   If the '09 F-150 falters in the slightest, their game maybe over.
 
   I've seen the next Ford Focus, and that ain't gonna git it!
 
   The market has already turned it's back on the 500, I mean the Taurus. Changing the name now only highlights the incompetence of a weak engine, cheap wood, and bad Passat knock-off styling.
 
   Exploder is done. Ranger is Done. The minivan is done.
  
   Flex I don't get.
 
   Edge seems decent, but it's far from class-leading.
 
   Escape can't get a new V6 after 7 years? The thing just gets heavier.
 
   DrFill
#6 of 180
difference by nippononly
Apr 05, 2007 (6:33 am)
Reply
between Chrysler and Ford is that Ford has a global operation it can bring to bear when things at the North American operation get their suckiest.
 
By contrast, Chrysler is just about to be cut loose from its European partner and has already cut its ties with its Asian partners. Chrysler is all alone, with nothing in the cupboard (I liked that metaphor! ) as you say. I predict a break-up for Chrysler, with the winner the one who retains or gets Jeep.
 
Ford may hit the skids of bankruptcy, but I don't see a break-up in their future. If they do have to go to court, I hope someone over there finally has the sense to kill Mercury (and maybe Lincoln too, not exactly an inspiring or aspirational brand any more) and really focus on waking up the Ford brand from its coma.
#7 of 180
Ford as we know it... by bpizzuti
Apr 05, 2007 (6:53 am)
Reply
...will die. But Ford itself won't...they seem to be in the midst of redefining themselves into a low-volume performance brand. The Edge is decent (though heavy), the Fusion looks good. The next Focus (after the silly refresh) will likely finally be updated with the Euro platform. The Mustang, of course, is not going anywhere. Ford used to be just another producer of wheeled appliances, but that doesn't seem to be the case anymore (consider how much of their car business is now based on Mazda's work).
 
Ford as the source of Hertz snoozeboxes may be dead. But if Ford succeeds in turning itself into "American Mazda" they'll be OK. Especially if they really have the quality control under control (finally). The world finally figured out that Americans really do like driving Euro-style sporty cars, and since GM and DC seem to be slow on the uptake (though GM is turning Saturn into American Opel, so maybe they get it too), Ford may as well make use of Mazda's expertise to be the primary American manufacturer for such vehicles.
#8 of 180
Good points by drfill
Apr 05, 2007 (7:05 am)
Reply
The Mustang has acres of brand equity. The Fusion seems to be successful, though not a Camry/Accord-level success. And the F-150 will be a player for the forseeable future.
 
   Mercury is a true waste of money. The money spent thur should go to Lincoln, to build something somebody wants. Not much aspiration in Lincoln right now, probably because Ford's core is eroding.
 
   If Ford could make something cool like the Mazda3, they'd have 200k sales right thur. Not expecting much from the homely Focus, doh.
  
   The Freestyle was junk. The Flex is junk.
 
   DrFill
#9 of 180
Re: Good points [drfill] by steve_ HOST
Apr 05, 2007 (7:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: drfill (Apr 05, 2007 7:05 am)

The Freestyle owners seem to like their rides pretty good. Other than some rear brake issues, their biggest complaint is that Ford didn't market it very well.
#10 of 180
Re: Good points [steve_] by bpizzuti
Apr 05, 2007 (7:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Apr 05, 2007 7:11 am)

That's actually a major complaint. You can't sell cars to people if they don't know the car exists. Getting the message out about the product is almost as important as having the product itself.
 
Then again, with the overlap between Freestyle and Edge, I can see one of them going byebye...probably the Freestyle...and a third-row seat being added to the Edge if it is successful (It's a midsize...Mitsu and Toyota managed to get 3rd row seats into COMPACT SUVs).

Messages Page 1 of 18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
18
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement