Sign In Join 



BMW History and Engine Technology

59 messages,  Last post on Dec 15, 2008 at 9:47 AM

You are in the BMW M/M3/M6 Forum. Your Host is claires

What is this discussion about? BMW 3 Series, BMW 5 Series, BMW M3, BMW M5, BMW 7 Series, BMW M6, Automotive News, Coupe, Convertible, Sedan, Wagon


Messages Page 3 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#20 of 59
OOPS Inline 6 Cylinder by andres3
Mar 24, 2007 (6:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: blueguydotcom (Mar 24, 2007 12:35 pm)

Meant to say I6... not V6.
 
I knew that. I can see the 2.5 being OK for a 2800 lb car, but on a 3,000lb + car it just doesn't say zoom zoom or anything to me. Honda has been making 200+ horses from their V6's for a long LONG time now.
#21 of 59
Re: By the way... [fedlawman] by brightness04
Mar 25, 2007 (9:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: fedlawman (Mar 23, 2007 7:38 pm)

One look at NASA and Club racing will show that old E30's and 911's finish on the podium as often as their newer, more sophisticated cousins.
 
Club racings are divided into categories. Cars only race against other cars with comparable performance. If mixed categories are in the same race, higher performance cars have to carry a handicap. In theory club racing is about competition among drivers, not cars.
#22 of 59
Re: BMW 2.5 V6 [fedlawman] by brightness04
Mar 25, 2007 (9:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: fedlawman (Mar 23, 2007 8:03 pm)

BTW, I didn't know BMW made a V6. On what cars does this engine appear?
 
That's the point I was making. BMW never switched from I-6 to V6 like almost every other major manufacturer has done for packaging reason. Using an iron block I-6 that weighs more than an aluminum V8 only makes sense in terms of R&D cost savings (it takes a lot of money to design and build a new engine from grounds up; it took MB more than half a decade to make the switch from I-6 to V6). That in my humble opinion is short-sighted.
#23 of 59
Re: BMW 2.5 V6 [shipo] by brightness04
Mar 25, 2007 (10:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: shipo (Mar 24, 2007 12:17 pm)

Yes they did make 3.2 and 3.4 liter engines, marked as 5/733i and 5/735i, (wonderful or not). Those were "big-six" engines for the 5 and 7 series. I actually had a 535i once. All of today's BMW I-6 engines however are derived from the "baby-six" block from that time. The bore-to-stroke ratios were very different between the two lines. The baby-six allows higher revving, therefore more hp per liter. The big-six 3.4 only developed 185hp or so (later incresing to a little over 200hp). More importantly, the 5 series, even back in the 80's was a car approaching 190", therefore much more length to accommodate a straight-6 engine with bigger bore. The 3 series is a foot shorter even today!
#24 of 59
Re: BMW 2.5 V6 [brightness04] by shipo
Mar 25, 2007 (11:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: brightness04 (Mar 25, 2007 9:56 am)

An iron block I6? Ummm, can't remember the last time that BMW made an iron block I6.
 
As for why BMWs continued use of the naturally perfectly balanced I6 as opposed to selling out and moving to the more ubiqutous V6; one word, smoothness. In their favor, V6 engines offer packaging advantages, however, even with split crank throws and balance shafts up the ying-yang, they simply ain't as smooth.
 
In my humble opinion it is very precient that BMW is still using the I6.
 
Best Regards,
Shipo
#25 of 59
Re: BMW 2.5 V6 [brightness04] by shipo
Mar 25, 2007 (11:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: brightness04 (Mar 25, 2007 10:07 am)

"All of today's BMW I-6 engines however are derived from the "baby-six" block from that time."
 
Nope. The only I6 that BMW is still building that has any lineage to the older baby I6s is the aluminum blocked, steel sleeved N54 in the 335i and the 535i. The magnesium/aluminum/silicone composite blocked N52 that is also currently being built for the 328i and the 528i is that "All-New" design you spoke of earlier.
 
Best Regards,
Shipo
#26 of 59
Re: By the way... [brightness04] by fedlawman
Mar 25, 2007 (12:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: brightness04 (Mar 25, 2007 9:55 am)

"Club racings are divided into categories. Cars only race against other cars with comparable performance."
 
Exactly right. According to the SCCA, cars with comparable performance in the "B Stock" category include the 4-cylinder E30 M3 (trailing arm suspension and all), and the following more sophisticated/modern sports cars: 6-cylinder E36 M3, 6-cylinder E46 330i w/ZHP, Honda S2000, G35 Coupe, Porsche 911, 944 (16v and turbo), and Boxster - to name a few.
 
(BTW, I can confirm from personal experience that my E30 M3 is just as quick around a race track as a Honda S2000 and E36 M3.)
 
C Stock consists of the E30 trailing arm equipped Z3 1.9L going up against the IRS equipped 1.8L Miata.
 
Interesting note - the E30 318is (with M42) is classified higher than the E36 318is with the same engine (G Stock and H Stock respectively).
 
Obviously, BMW did something right with the E30 suspension to make it so competitive against cars with "more sophisticated" suspensions.
#27 of 59
Re: BMW 2.5 V6 [shipo] by wale_bate1
Mar 25, 2007 (2:55 pm)
Reply

Replying to: shipo (Mar 25, 2007 11:21 am)

Another word: response.
 
IMO, Toyota made a mistake in not developing an update to their I6. Even with its weight and power issues, the Supra's old iron block 3.0L is a more satisfying plant to operate than the 3.5L V6. Yet one more reason not to purchase the G2 IS...
#28 of 59
Re: BMW 2.5 V6 [shipo] by brightness04
Mar 25, 2007 (9:01 pm)
Reply

Replying to: shipo (Mar 25, 2007 11:21 am)

An iron block I6? Ummm, can't remember the last time that BMW made an iron block I6.
 
Do you remember the current M3? E46 M3 3.2L has an iron block for compactness. In other words, an aluminum I-6 would be too long to fit in the car.
 
As to smoothness, you'd be hard pressed to find fault in the Acura 3.5 or the Toyota 3.5 in terms of their smoothness.
#29 of 59
Re: By the way... [fedlawman] by brightness04
Mar 25, 2007 (9:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fedlawman (Mar 25, 2007 12:10 pm)

IMHO, the bigger reason is that E30 weigh less. E36 318is is obviously a heavy pig compared to E30 without power increase. E36 M3 for the US market is a bastardized car using a bored out regular engine developing only 240hp, not the 320hp real M3 engine. When output are comparable, the lighter cars have significant advantage.
 
The thing is, most performance oriented ELLPS, or even V6 family sedans, have more than 240hp nowadays.

Messages Page 3 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement