Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans BMW 3-Series BMW History and Engine Technology
52 messages, Last post on Apr 03, 2007 at 12:44 AM
You are in the BMW 3-Series Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: circlew (Mar 23, 2007 2:33 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: andres3 (Mar 23, 2007 1:42 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: brightness04 (Mar 23, 2007 8:45 am) Well, I'll agree and disagree. One look at NASA and Club racing will show that old E30's and 911's finish on the podium as often as their newer, more sophisticated cousins. I will say that cars today are the result of a natural (unfortunate) steady "improvement" of the breed. They have aged with us - like us, they're softer, heavier, and more mature than a few years ago, yet they still cling to a part of the "inner party animal" they used to be. Personally, I'll pass on the fillet mignon and cabernet, thank you. I want Doritos and a rum & coke.
|
|
|
Replying to: brightness04 (Mar 23, 2007 5:19 pm) From a performance point of view, a properly set up e30 rear suspension will perform basically the same as an E90 rear suspension - that is, it will adjust camber with changes in suspension load to optimize tire contact with the pavement. BTW, I didn't know BMW made a V6. On what cars does this engine appear?
|
|
|
Replying to: fedlawman (Mar 23, 2007 9:03 pm) Best Regards, Shipo |
|
|
Replying to: fedlawman (Mar 23, 2007 8:38 pm) I want my Cabernet and FM and eat it too. When lighter weight metals and better synthetics are integrated into the formula to get the weight under 1.5 tons in this category, I will get my wish. For now, I will need to work out harder to keep up with the extra calories! Regards, OW |
|
|
Replying to: shipo (Mar 23, 2007 9:27 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: pearl (Mar 24, 2007 12:10 pm) Best Regards, Shipo
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: pearl (Mar 24, 2007 12:10 pm) The M3 had a 3.2 inline 6 and that engine is still considered a beast. the M3 CSL made 350 hp with a 3.2
|
|
|
Replying to: blueguydotcom (Mar 24, 2007 1:35 pm)  Meant to say I6... not V6. I knew that. I can see the 2.5 being OK for a 2800 lb car, but on a 3,000lb + car it just doesn't say zoom zoom or anything to me. Honda has been making 200+ horses from their V6's for a long LONG time now. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans BMW 3-Series BMW History and Engine Technology
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2009 BMW 3 Series
2009 BMW 5 Series
2009 BMW M3
2008 BMW M5
2008 BMW 7 Series
2008 BMW M6
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
