Article Comments 2007 Mazda CX-9 Full and Long Term Test

25 messages, Last post on Dec 12, 2008 at 9:22 AM

You are in the Mazda CX-9 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Mazda CX-9, SUV

Article comments for Full Test: 2007 Mazda CX-9 - Fun to drive and practical, the Mazda CX-9 is a sporty alternative to the traditional minivan. (more)

Long-Term Test: 2008 Mazda CX-9 Touring - Zoom-zoominess abounds in anything Mazda graces with its seagull-inspired badge, and its newest crossover is no exception. The 2008 model year marks the debut of the 3.7-liter DOHC V6 in the CX-9. Power has been increased to 273 horsepower, up from 263 in the 2007 CX-9 with its 3.5-liter V6. Fuel economy has also improved to 17 mpg city/24 mpg highway, a gain of 1 mpg and 2 mpg, respectively. (more)

Outline

Messages Page 1 of 3: 1; 2; 3; Prev; Next; Last

#1 of 25 Article Comments 2007 Mazda CX-9 Full Test by KarenS HOST Mar 23, 2007 (8:57 am)
Check out our 2007 CX-9 Full Test. Post your comments here. Full Test: 2007 Mazda CX-9
#2 of 25 Ford should ask Mazda for some help by desmolicious Mar 23, 2007 (11:31 am)
Great review, and what a nice vehicle. Amazing how good this one is, while how poor the Ford Edge is. I've seen a couple in my neighbourhood and they really do look upmarket. The only thing is that I'm having a hard time differentiating between this and the CX-7. CX-7 is just a smaller version? Replies to this message: desmolicious (Mar 23, 2007 11:45 am) laker34 (Mar 23, 2007 12:14 pm) mortgagemal (May 04, 2007 6:46 pm)
#3 of 25 Re: Ford should ask Mazda for some help [desmolicious] by desmolicious Mar 23, 2007 (11:45 am)
Replying to: desmolicious (Mar 23, 2007 11:31 am) ok, just checked, the CX-7 has only 2 rows of seats and a 4 cylinder turbo motor.
#4 of 25 Re: Ford should ask Mazda for some help [desmolicious] by laker34 Mar 23, 2007 (12:14 pm)
Replying to: desmolicious (Mar 23, 2007 11:31 am) What part of the country do you live in. I live in So Cal and I haven't seen any on the road.
#5 of 25 The CX-9's real competetors? by david123 Mar 23, 2007 (1:31 pm)
I can't believe you completely left out the Outlook, Acadia, and Freestyle in your article. The Outlook and Acadia are superb vehicles, under any circumstances, and probably the best crossovers on the road (not everybody likes the sporty nature of the Mazda.) The Freestyle is also a great car, just a little dated, but it too, still deserves attention. I was surprised that these three cars were left out.
#6 of 25 CX9 - too expensive with option by 23109vc Mar 25, 2007 (8:16 am)
We test drove several CX-9s at our local dealer. We were cross shopping the MDX and RX350 and considered the CX9 to see if we could get as much utility with less money. We found the base model "sport" to feel extremely cheap. the only one that felt "luxurious" was the Grand Touring model and it was priced at almost $40k fully loaded. I picked up a 2007 MDX tech for $43k. for the 3k difference, the MDX is leaps and bounds better. if you buy this car, get the cheap one and enjoy it for the utility. if you want utility AND luxury, get an MDX. Replies to this message: jg6 (Mar 25, 2007 3:14 pm) mortgagemal (May 04, 2007 6:51 pm) nxs138 (Mar 25, 2007 3:34 pm)
#7 of 25 Re: CX9 - too expensive with option [23109vc] by jg6 Mar 25, 2007 (3:14 pm)
Replying to: 23109vc (Mar 25, 2007 8:16 am) Yes, buy a MDX if you want lower gas mileage, a smaller interior volume, a larger turning radius and 3rd seat legroom for 5 year olds and younger. Also you can buy a loaded CX-9 for invoice or less so an out the door price s/b ~$36,000 + TTL. And you save on TTL with a less expensive car also. Why stop at a MDX? why not step up to a ML500?? It might make the MDX look good. Replies to this message: mortgagemal (May 04, 2007 6:51 pm)
#8 of 25 Re: CX9 - too expensive with option [23109vc] by nxs138 Mar 25, 2007 (3:34 pm)
Replying to: 23109vc (Mar 25, 2007 8:16 am) This is hard to compare: the MDX TECH does not have rear seat DVD, but has the sunroof. You didn't specify if you choose the loaded GT with the sunroof, or with the rear seat DVD. I will assume you compared the CX-9 with the sunroof (MDX with TECH and ENT goes for nearly $46k). The CX-9 also has: 1. keyless entry and ignition 2. power liftgage 3. rain sensing wipers 4. 6-speed transmission Not sure what these features are worth to you, but would likely add $1k to the price of the Acura. So the real net difference here is probably about $4k.
#10 of 25 Re:CX90 by mortgagemal May 04, 2007 (6:46 pm)
Replying to: desmolicious (Mar 23, 2007 11:31 am) I just test drove the CX9, and then the Audi Q7 at the same dealer in Oakland. I did the exact same 15 mile loop. Mazda(similarly equipped to the AUDI) 3.5 L V6 rides and drives better for $20k less. 0-60 is 7.7 sec. v. 10.0 for Audi with 3.6L. Audi weighs 1000 lbs more, and 3rd row seat is less roomy and tougher to reach. People should look at them side by side! I drove the Edge and frestyle an hour before...Not bad, but not up to this caliber performance, fit and finish.Zoom!