Sign In Join 



Nissan Sentra Spec V vs Honda Civic Si

176 messages,  Last post on Mar 02, 2009 at 5:53 PM

You are in the Nissan Sentra Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Nissan Sentra, Honda Civic, Sedan


Messages Page 15 of 18
1
...
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#137 of 176
Re: Motor Trend comparison [laneg] by k5ldb
Aug 21, 2007 (6:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: laneg (Aug 21, 2007 10:03 am)

About 2 or 3 months ago someone was on here and it seemed as if he thought the prior generation V was FAR superior to the current Si sedan. It wasn't a slam on anyone although it was referenced because of his posts.
#138 of 176
Re: Spec V vs. Si Sedan [jd10013] by eldaino
Aug 23, 2007 (10:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: jd10013 (Aug 21, 2007 2:09 pm)

Honda's only choice for performance is the Si.
 
huh? what about the s2000?!!! what about the 6speed manual v-6 accord coupes and sedans?
 
i would hardly call the maxima a 'performance' vehicle, as it weighs more than the altima, and still has the limitations of fwd...which don't allow it to be grouped with the likes of the gt-r or the 350z.
#139 of 176
Re: Motor Trend comparison [k5ldb] by eldaino
Aug 23, 2007 (10:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: k5ldb (Aug 21, 2007 6:47 pm)

ah yes, good old james!
 
unfortunately, even comparing numbers from the previous generation spec v to the new si, the si is still the winner in the handling and transmission dept, as well as the interior.
 
the spec v is only ever so slightly quicker. (new and old versions.)
#140 of 176
Re: Motor Trend comparison [laneg] by eldaino
Aug 23, 2007 (10:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: laneg (Aug 21, 2007 10:03 am)

I'm not sure if that is some kind of slam or what
 
i don't think it was.
 
Nissan shouldn't have claimed that, and the V should probably be tested against the more mainstream versions of other brands. They shouldn't have used the spec-v badging and maybe just called it a Sentra S.
 
but see, here is the problem. the spec-v IS supposed to be the 'hardcore' version.
 
Remember, there is the SE-R and the SE-R spec v. its not that the car is not 'worthy' of the title, it just really does not perform as well as the competitors.
 
the regular SE-R would be your 'sentra S'.
#141 of 176
Re: Spec V vs. Si Sedan [eldaino] by jd10013
Aug 24, 2007 (5:42 pm)
Reply

Replying to: eldaino (Aug 23, 2007 10:32 am)

don't believe I've ever seen an s2000 on the road, and I certainly wouldn't consider a V6 accord a performance car.
 
You may have a point with the maxima, but nothing honda makes is even in the same leauge as the 350, GT-r, or upcomming 400Z
#142 of 176
Re: Spec V vs. Si Sedan [laneg] by bullardohio
Aug 25, 2007 (5:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: laneg (Aug 20, 2007 6:01 pm)

Great review!! I agree w/ everything (especially about the looks department) except for the shifter. To me, the Honda shifter was too tiny, like it was made for a kiddy car. Yes, the Nissan shifter is plastic, but at least it feels like a shifter in my hands. Just my thoughts.....
#143 of 176
Re: Spec V vs. Si Sedan by k5ldb
Aug 26, 2007 (8:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: bullardohio (Aug 25, 2007 5:35 am)

Just saw an episode of Motorweek on PBS about the Spec V. They were generally favorable to the car but that's typical of them. They commented on the suspension being a little softer and gave performance times of 7.0 to 60 and 15.4 92 in the quarter. They pointed out the red seatbelts although they didn't say just how ridiculous they are. Their unit had been abused on the brakes so it took 142 feet from 60 but otherwise they said the performance numbers should be typical and accurate.
#144 of 176
Re: Spec V vs. Si Sedan [k5ldb] by jd10013
Aug 26, 2007 (8:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: k5ldb (Aug 26, 2007 8:36 am)

just because the si is a smidge better doesn't make the spec V a bad car. its also worth noting that the spec V is a bit lower in price. so the Si does give you more, but at a price.
#145 of 176
Re: Spec V vs. Si Sedan [jd10013] by k5ldb
Aug 26, 2007 (10:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: jd10013 (Aug 26, 2007 8:50 am)

just because the si is a smidge better doesn't make the spec V a bad car. its also worth noting that the spec V is a bit lower in price. so the Si does give you more, but at a price.
 
This is true although for the few hundred dollars more the Si costs it comes with traction control and stability control you can't even get on the V. I believe the V is an excellent vehicle for what it is meant to be. In some ways it's better than an Si and in others it falls behind. I don't think it's amazingly better than the Si like at least one contributor suggested.
#146 of 176
Re: Spec V vs. Si Sedan [jd10013] by eldaino
Aug 27, 2007 (7:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: jd10013 (Aug 26, 2007 8:50 am)

the last se-r i saw (note se-r not the spec v version) was optioned out and was over 23k.
 
you can nab a nice sedan or coupe si for around 21 easily.

Messages Page 15 of 18
1
...
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement