Article Comments 2007 Audi Q7 Long Term Test

12 messages, Last post on May 17, 2008 at 8:41 AM

You are in the Audi Q7 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Audi Q7, SUV

Article comments for Long-Term Test: 2007 Audi Q7 4.2 Premium - uxury SUV buyers want three things. They want comfort, utility and safety. Audi's first attempt in this segment offers all of these. (more)

Outline

Messages Page 1 of 2: 1; 2; Prev; Next; Last

#1 of 12 Article Comments 2007 Audi Q7 Long Term Test by KarenS HOST Mar 09, 2007 (8:12 am)
Ride along on our 2007 Q7 4.2 Premium long term test and post your observations here. Long-Term Test: 2007 Audi Q7 4.2 Premium
#2 of 12 Re Test Later by chewym Mar 09, 2007 (10:30 pm)
If you retest the Q7 later, after 5,000 miles or so I am sure you will get better numbers. Audi engines and the V8 seem to pick up quite a bit of power after some miles. Fuel economy would also probably improve as it picks up some more miles. Replies to this message: steve_ (Mar 09, 2007 11:12 pm)
#3 of 12 Re: Re Test Later [chewym] by steve_ HOST Mar 09, 2007 (11:12 pm)
Replying to: chewym (Mar 09, 2007 10:30 pm) Since it's in the long term fleet, the editors will be blogging about the Q7 almost daily. So check the Weblog: Long Term Road Tests pages frequently - power and mpg will surely come up.
#4 of 12 re test better by evltrpl Mar 10, 2007 (9:49 am)
who ever was driving this long term Q7 needs to have a better driver test the acceleration and braking. Those numbers are way below what everybody else has been measuring, like Motor Trend for example. They also need to read the brochure and the owner manual, the ESP/ASR, hill assist and anti rollover are standard on any Q7 not just the premium. What a lack of professionalism.
#5 of 12 Purchasing Long Term Test Vehicles? by dinomartini Mar 10, 2007 (2:37 pm)
So, you guys have to buy long term test vehicles? You cant just phone up Audi and say "hey this is edmunds, we would like to have a Q7 for a long term test" Replies to this message: civicguy3 (Mar 10, 2007 8:04 pm) steve_ (Mar 10, 2007 8:44 pm)
#6 of 12 Re: Purchasing Long Term Test Vehicles? [dinomartini] by civicguy3 Mar 10, 2007 (8:04 pm)
Replying to: dinomartini (Mar 10, 2007 2:37 pm) it says on the bottom of the page "the manufacturer provided edmunds with this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation" so they did not buy it. Hey what happened to the long term 550 Maranello? 550 maranello Replies to this message: steve_ (Mar 10, 2007 8:44 pm)
#7 of 12 Re: Purchasing Long Term Test Vehicles? [civicguy3] by steve_ HOST Mar 10, 2007 (8:44 pm)
Replying to: civicguy3 (Mar 10, 2007 8:04 pm) I think this one must be a loaner since the fine print will say "Edmunds purchased this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation" if it was purchased for the fleet. Either that or they are using a template and are forgetting to update the boilerplate. I don't know what happened to the Maranello wrap-up. Maybe it's still in the garage getting fixed!
#8 of 12 Audis Scare Me by roblaw May 16, 2008 (2:46 am)
When I researched for a new car I excluded Audi for exactly the reason you were frustrated, dealer service. No waiting area? At my Lexus dealer the waiting area is like a SPA. It has a flat screen TV, wireless internet and fresh baked pastries, not that I ever spent any time there. Never had a problem with my Lexus that caused the need for a special trip and Lexus provides free pickup and delivery and a free Lexus rental. You guys were lucky since the internet is full of Audi owners who suggest the general reliability is poor and neither the dealers nor the company advocate for the customer. Beautiful interiors aside, the ownership experience needs to be better at Audi prices. While Lexus vehicles are far from exciting they really make the ownership experience pleasant. Replies to this message: ody02tjk (May 16, 2008 10:51 am)
#9 of 12 Re: Audis Scare Me [roblaw] by ody02tjk May 16, 2008 (10:51 am)
Replying to: roblaw (May 16, 2008 2:46 am) I had a Lexus LX450 for 10 years, and then got my q7. Needless to say, I was quite worried about the service experience as well. I found that the closest Audi repair shop had rather poor service compared to my Lexus experience. However, the next closest Audi dealer also has a Lexus shop next door (part of the same ownership group). This location is wonderful, and takes it as a challenge to be as good if not better than the neighboring Lexus shop. I have been quite impressed with Len Stoler Audi Service. They even provided loaner cars.
#10 of 12 Wondering by rghojai May 16, 2008 (1:00 pm)
As often happens with reviews, long-term, comparisons or single-car reviews, I'm left wondering about how aggressively people drove. Obviously this is a low-mpg vehicle, but 14 overall seems atrocious. Too, brake pads being done after 24,000 miles seems awfully low. (I've put about that many miles on a 97 Crown Vic PI I got w/o knowledge of how new the brake pads were and my mechanic told me last week that the front pads have about 50% left.) I noted in a comparison elsewhere that a Rabbit got 22 mpg in "combined" driving, but nothing more about the nature of the driving. If testers are driving appreciably faster, more aggressively than the vast majority of drivers... or not, it seems like it'd be worth mentioning, as it relates to fuel economy, things like brake wear. Replies to this message: sharpedgeshurt (May 17, 2008 8:41 am)