Sign In Join 



Nissan Altima vs Toyota Camry

50 messages,  Last post on Jul 13, 2009 at 6:09 AM

You are in the Nissan Altima Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Nissan Altima, Toyota Camry, Sedan


Messages Page 5 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#39 of 50
Re: 2007 Nissan Altima vs 2007 Camry [car111] by pavelbarchuk
Oct 29, 2008 (1:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: car111 (Mar 07, 2007 5:56 pm)

i drive a infiniti G35 which i believe is built on the nissan altima platform. Its really nice, good handling, but the worst thing about it, its very load, alot of road noise and infiniti is supposed to be a little better quality, its still loud. I sold toyotas for a long time, my favorite is the 4 cylinder camry xle. its very quiet, good handling and excellent resale value, with nissan on the other hand, they are merging with dodge, so resale values of nissan will probably go down with years to come.



#40 of 50
Re: 2007 Nissan Altima vs 2007 Camry [pavelbarchuk] by madpistol
Oct 29, 2008 (5:35 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pavelbarchuk (Oct 29, 2008 1:59 pm)

Hmmmm.... You're comparing a 4 cyl Camry XLE to an Infiniti G35?!?!? Can you get any more different in terms of what cars are built for?
 
Camry: Calm, comfortable cruiser that has rock solid reliability and usability. It's usually considered a car that's "easy on the eyes" and the wallet, but it doesn't generate excitement when you drive it. It's affordable and easy to maintain. It's a great "grandma" car.
 
G35: Quick and exciting sport sedan. The G35 was built to handle curves with poise that is usually only beaten by BMW's 335i. The G35 also has a 306HP V6 with a 7500 RPM redline. The car is very fast, no matter what the conditions are. However, it was NOT engineered to be quiet and comfortable like the Camry. Adding extra sound deadening adds a lot of extra weight to the car. This would take away from the driving experience drastically. You can't get the thrills OR technology offered on the G35 on a Camry.
 
There's a reason the G35 costs more than a Camry. It's an apples to oranges comparison.
 
Also, Nissan is NOT merging with Dodge. They're partnering together to engineer new vehicles much the same way Toyota and Pontiac partnered to create the Toyota Matrix and the Pontiac Vibe.
 
Furthermore, when I was testing new vehicles, I tested both the Camry and the Altima... I bought the Altima. The Camry is a good car, but lets face it. The Camry is about as interesting as a log in the middle of a road; it's there and there's no way to avoid it. Go drive a Camry and an Altima on curvy roads and you'll quickly see why the I bought the Altima. The Altima is far and away the more competent handling sedan. Not to mention Nissan's 2.5L/CVT engine easily outpaces Toyota's 2.4L/5-speed automatic. There's no comparison.
#41 of 50
Re: 2007 Nissan Altima vs 2007 Camry [madpistol] by thegraduate
Nov 03, 2008 (10:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: madpistol (Oct 29, 2008 5:35 pm)

Not to mention Nissan's 2.5L/CVT engine easily outpaces Toyota's 2.4L/5-speed automatic. There's no comparison.
 
The revised 2010 Camry (due in early 2009) will feature the 2.5L I4 engine that is currently in the 2009 RAV4. It produces 179hp in that application.
 
Just thought I'd pass that on.
 
TheGrad
#42 of 50
Re: 2007 Nissan Altima vs 2007 Camry [thegraduate] by guyverfanboy
Jan 20, 2009 (11:39 pm)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Nov 03, 2008 10:34 am)

That is totally awesome news. I hope the 2010 camry is even better
 
Once, I pay off my 2008 Rav4 I'd eventually like to get an Altima.
#43 of 50
Re: 2007 Nissan Altima vs 2007 Camry [thegraduate] by madpistol
Jan 21, 2009 (6:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Nov 03, 2008 10:34 am)

The revised 2010 Camry (due in early 2009) will feature the 2.5L I4 engine that is currently in the 2009 RAV4. It produces 179hp in that application.
 
That's only in the SE model. The I4 LE will only produce 169hp.
 
However, I'm interested in what Toyota will bring to the table with the introduction of this new engine. I may have to test drive one of these when they hit the sales floor in a couple of months.
 
However, the big IF on this car is will the SE model inherit good steering feel like a proper sport sedan? If it doesn't, It's still a lost cause. Throwing more power at a car with numb steering only leads to one thing.... a powerful car with numb steering.
 
If that's the case, I'll keep my Altima.
#44 of 50
Re: 2007 Nissan Altima vs 2007 Camry [madpistol] by wwest
Jan 21, 2009 (8:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: madpistol (Jan 21, 2009 6:01 am)

"..a powerful car with numb stearing..."
 
With a powerful FWD you have only two choices, "numb" stearing or torque stearing that will yank the stearing wheel from your grasp.
#45 of 50
Re: 2007 Nissan Altima vs 2007 Camry [wwest] by madpistol
Jan 21, 2009 (12:35 pm)
Reply

Replying to: wwest (Jan 21, 2009 8:31 am)

With a powerful FWD you have only two choices, "numb" stearing or torque stearing that will yank the stearing wheel from your grasp.
 
Or, you can buy an Altima/Maxima which can be equipped with either a 270HP or 290HP V6, and feel no torque steer at all. However, the steering wheel is still fully responsive and gives you plenty of road feel as well. That's another option.
#46 of 50
Re: 2007 Nissan Altima vs 2007 Camry [madpistol] by wwest
Jan 21, 2009 (3:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: madpistol (Jan 21, 2009 12:35 pm)

"...and feel no torque stear at all.."
 
Many modern day FWD cars with high HP/torque engines are overcoming/alleviating torque stear by automatically derating the engine via DBW in low gear ratios or in an accelerating tight turn.
 
290HP...sometimes...
#47 of 50
Re: Altima SE beats Camry SE hands down [nhmtnbkr] by smarty666
Jul 13, 2009 (6:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: nhmtnbkr (Jul 21, 2008 9:23 am)

I do agree both Lexus, Toyota, and Nissan use OEM Bridgestone Turanza's on their vehicles and they are indeed the crappiest tire on the market. I can vouch for that because my 2008 TL came with OEM Bridgestone Turanza's EL400 and they were the worst tire I have every had. Those tires were really loud, gave a bumpy and lousy ride quality to the vehicle and worst of all, anything above 50 mph gave terrible shimmy/vibrations through the steering wheel and seats of the car. Had a front wheel alignment done and still had the vibrations. Also, these tires gave virtually no traction or grip in wet weather. I wouldn't want to even imagine what they are like in snowy weather. Contacted bridgestone and was able to make a deal and have the top of the line Bridgestone serenity's put on the car. Only got Bridgestones because that was the only way we could get a deal because the OEM's where practically brand new with only about 2000k miles on them. THAT MADE ALL THE DIFFERENCE!! The vibrations stopped at higth speeds and they are a lot quieter than the OEM Turanza's. The serenity's are nice but they are a really expensive tire (for a Acura TL they are about $245 a tire). Would never have Bridgestones on a sedan ever again. Better off with Michelin, Goodyear, or Yokies!!
 
Nissan has finally gotten their act together and are starting to put Michelin Primacy's on all versions of the altima except the SE which has the crappy OEM Turanza's EL400 still. While the Primacy's aren't the best tire they are ten times better than the OEM Bridgestone Turanza's. If you get a camry or a lexus opt for the OEM Michelin Energy's if you can rather than the OEM Bridgestone Turanza's. The Michelin Energy's isn't a great tire either but it is the better of two evils. Avoid OEM Bridgestone Turanza's EL400 at all cost!!!!!!

Messages Page 5 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement