You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Nissan Altima
Nissan Altima vs Toyota Camry

50 messages, Last post on Jul 13, 2009 at 6:09 AM
You are in the Nissan Altima Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: mikolas (Aug 23, 2007 7:31 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: jd10013 (Aug 24, 2007 1:04 pm)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: bv050506 (Aug 31, 2007 6:23 am) Message #381 in 2007 Altima: For the March issue, Consumer Reports magazine tested five family sedans (Kia Optima, Saturn Aura, Pontiac G6 and Chrysler Sebring), titled it Leaping Ahead, with the sub-title The Redesigned Nissan Altima Accelerates to the Top of Our Ratings. Also, they tested both four cylinder and V-6 versions in this comprehensive test. The four cylinder won almost all the acceleration tests--only beat by .2 of a second by the Saturn Aura 45-65, had the best gas mileage of all. The V-6 won ALL the acceleration tests (0-60 6.4), (45-65 3.9), 1/4 mile 15, and got best mileage of all tested. It begins by saying "The Altima 3.5 SE virtually ties with the Honda Accord V6, our top-rated family sedan. The four-cylinder Altima 2.5S is relatively refined. Both are coupled to a smooth continuously variable transmission, which helps them attain commendable fuel economy." CR continues: "Both engines deliver strong acceleration yet get commendable fuel economy. The 175-HP 2.5-litre four cylinder accelerates better than some V6s and returned 25 MPG overall on regular fuel. Although it requires premium fuel, the smooth and punchy 270-HP 3.5-litre V6 returns 23 MPG (I'm actually hoping for better) overall, comparable to some four-cylinder engines. Both are mated to a smooth CVT. Braking performance is very good. Both halogen and HID low beams perform well but have a sharp cutoff." About the interior it says "The Altima has nicely textured, well-fitting materials. Drivers have plenty of room in the cockpit, even with the optional sunroof. The steering wheel has an awkward telescope adjustment and coarse tilt settings. While rear-visibility is hampered by a high rear deck, the 3.5 SE's optional backup camera works well. The Altima's bright back-lighted gauges are easy to read. The controls are straightforward and the optional navigation system is easy to use." I will have to say, on my first highway trip, I did find the seats harder than usual, as some others have pointed out, but not badly so. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: keithl (Jun 26, 2007 2:28 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: victrolajazz (Aug 31, 2007 12:27 pm) this car. In a word: WOW! The redesign is excellent inside and outside -- firmness of seating notwithstanding. Sportier than Toyota Camry and without the acceleration issues many consumers have ascribed to Camry. What's not to like about the 2007 2.5S Altima? The updated styling, automotive technology (CVT transmission), and affordable financing options available through Nissan are all -- first rate! I won't bash the competition, however, I 'm not aware of a better car anywhere for a working man's price.
|
|
|
Replying to: refined (Sep 02, 2007 3:56 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: victrolajazz (Aug 31, 2007 12:27 pm) Basically, more power, better EPA ratings, smaller dimensions, bigger trunk and huge gas tank. Nissan also had better deals than Toyota. We had 4 adults in out Altima last weekend and there weren't any complaints. Performance wise, you didn't even notice the weight. That CVT and 2.5L combination is sweet. Why bother with a V6. To another poster... check you manual, but premium is only recommended in the V6 for best performance, but I don't think it's required. The engine will altimatically retard the timing to compensate for the fuel your using. You'll may lose 2-3% in mileage and about 30 peak horsepower but not much if any loss at low RPM's in normal driving.... but premium costs about 10% more than regular. I have hte same issue wiht my BMW motorcyle. I usually just use premium since it gets 40+mpg anyway, but I can use regular and take a 5-10HP hit.
|
|
I had a 2007 Camry, V6, I had problems so I went to a 2007 Altima SE V6, I thought the car was as good as the Camry, especially the CVT but I found the ride and Torque steer a problem. The Altima SE rides like a buckboard (an old wagon), but I know alot of people like the road feel, but I did not, in a cold climate and bad roads it sucked in that department. But if you want to feel the road that's the car, I bought a 2008 Camry, and I love the ride. The SE radio was better, blue tooth better, leather seats harder, and head room a bit more than the Camry, both cars great. But for me it's the Camry.
|
|
|
Replying to: carguy65 (Mar 26, 2008 7:17 am) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: carguy65 (Mar 26, 2008 7:17 am) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Nissan Altima
Nissan Altima vs Toyota Camry
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Nissan Altima
2010 Toyota Camry



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic